What Are the Social Teachings of the Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Montie_Claunch
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Montie_Claunch

Guest
R.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t herd anything much about the Churchs Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
 
You might take a look at something like www.justfaith.org. Our Archdiocese approved the program and the response from parsishes has been very good.

The principal fondation for Social Justice in Catholicism lies in Holy Scripture.
 
R.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t heard anything much about the Church’s Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
The themes of Catholic social teaching (excerpted here), according to the USCCB, are:
  • Life and dignity of the human person
  • Call to Family, Community, and Participation
  • Rights and Responsibilities
  • Option for the Poor and Vulnerable
  • The Dignity of Work and the Rights of Workers
  • Solidarity
  • Care for God’s Creation
A linked list to the Papal and Vatican documents on Catholic social teaching is here.

The central reason why we believe in these things is because of Jesus’ mandate to love one another, because of the Beatitudes, and because of Matthew 25, which I list here for you:

Then the king will say to those on his right, 'Come, you who are blessed by my Father. Inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.

For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, a stranger and you welcomed me,

naked and you clothed me, ill and you cared for me, in prison and you visited me.’

Then the righteous will answer him and say, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink?

When did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you?

When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?’

And the king will say to them in reply, ‘Amen, I say to you, whatever you did for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.’

Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.

For I was hungry and you gave me no food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink,

a stranger and you gave me no welcome, naked and you gave me no clothing, ill and in prison, and you did not care for me.’

Then they will answer and say, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or ill or in prison, and not minister to your needs?’

He will answer them, ‘Amen, I say to you, what you did not do for one of these least ones, you did not do for me.’

And these will go off to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life."
The Catechism says:

1928 Society ensures social justice when it provides the conditions that allow associations or individuals to obtain what is their due, according to their nature and their vocation. Social justice is linked to the common good and the exercise of authority.

The run-down from the Catechism is here.

On a side note, my opinion as to why you don’t hear so much about social justice could be because the media is connecting social justice with the Democratic party, which is an immediate turn-off to many conservative Catholics. But I don’t mean to say that you are anything other than a Catholic brother.

Cool?
 
You might take a look at something like www.justfaith.org. Our Archdiocese approved the program and the response from parsishes has been very good.

The principal fondation for Social Justice in Catholicism lies in Holy Scripture.
Yep, I think this is an excellent program. I wish we could afford it at our parish.
 
Yep, I think this is an excellent program. I wish we could afford it at our parish.
FWIW, we subsidized two of our sister parish’s for all the books. They, in turn, really helped with putting together some meaningful immersion experiences.

I was actually skeptical. Like many ‘Irish Catholics’, social justice was emphasized as a critical part of our faith from a young age. So the idea of spending, say, 30 weeks learning as opposed to ‘doing’ seemed odd to me. But having followed along with the reading and watched the first group go through the process, I’m now convinced that the approach is a very good one.
 
Ah yes, the ‘if it doesn’t address abortion it can’t be Catholic’ point of view. I suppose I should be thankful that this crowd hasn’t noticed that Jesus didn’t bother with the matter in his earthly ministry either… 🤷
 
R.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t herd anything much about the Churchs Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
Key themes
Life and dignity of the human person
Call to family, community, and participation
Rights and responsibilities
Preferential Option for the poor and vulnerable
Dignity of work and the rights of workers
Solidarity
Care for God’s creation

try this

or this might be more readable

We believe them because while free will is part of our being that doesn’t mean that we can do anything we want. Our interactions with others must be in accordance with Natural law.
 
Ah yes, the ‘if it doesn’t address abortion it can’t be Catholic’ point of view. I suppose I should be thankful that this crowd hasn’t noticed that Jesus didn’t bother with the matter in his earthly ministry either… 🤷
Take a peek at the entire page. It mentions more than that including links to dissident groups.

Also, that Scripture does not specfically record the word abortion as coming out of Christ’s mouth in no way means it is of little importance.
Call To Action ‘96: ‘We Are People Of The Story’ Among them Hans Kung, Bishop Jacques Gaillot, Jack Jezreel from Kentucky, Sr. Miriam Therese Winter, Ada Isasi-Diaz, Tom Conry, Diann Neu, Fran Ferder, John Heagle, Bishop Ray Lucker…
And more…
 
It at least appears to me that those Catholcis who are most passionate for Social Justice often neglect a key component - subsidiarity, (CCC 1883-1885) vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a1.htm
Essentially, the lowest level of community that can deal with an issue should be enabled and allowed to do so.
 
Also, that Scripture does not specfically record the word abortion as coming out of Christ’s mouth in no way means it is of little importance.
No one said otherwise. But elevating anything above the direct teachings of Christ seems dangerous.

As far as dissidents, etc., yes the reading lists will typically include works like “The Gospel through 3rd World Eyes” which discusses how very differently Christains in different parts of the world interpret very famliar readings in Scripture. Or, say, a work on Ghandi’s non-Christain, non-violent movement in India.

I guess the assumption is that the program is more suitable for Catholics who feel that their faith is a powerful beacon to carry into a dark world. Such people are seldom intimidated by alternate world views. However, if you are the sort of Catholic who views faith as a feeble candle that must be sheltered and protected, lest it fall pray to an outside concept, a challenging and thought provoking reading list is probably not for you.

If I sound like I am rolling my eyes, I am. I’ve heard the same ‘it’s an attack on the Church because it might suggest that there is more to our faith than abortion!!!’ stuff about RENEW. But year after year, I see life long active parish members stand up and talk about their experiences with the program. Gasp, they generally recite Scripture and the Catechism with passion, and explain how prayer and study help reinject both into their lives…
 
No one said otherwise. But elevating anything above the direct teachings of Christ seems dangerous.
Huh? The teaching on abortion is from Christ.
As far as dissidents, etc., yes the reading lists will typically include works like “The Gospel through 3rd World Eyes” which discusses how very differently Christains in different parts of the world interpret very famliar readings in Scripture. Or, say, a work on Ghandi’s non-Christain, non-violent movement in India.
The link referred to specific heterodox Catholics and their organizations. I hardly think things like CTA have any legitimacy as related to Church teaching.
I guess the assumption is that the program is more suitable for Catholics who feel that their faith is a powerful beacon to carry into a dark world. Such people are seldom intimidated by alternate world views.
Alternate views? Heterodoxy is not simply an alternate view, it is an error.
However, if you are the sort of Catholic who views faith as a feeble candle that must be sheltered and protected, lest it fall pray to an outside concept, a challenging and thought provoking reading list is probably not for you.
What type of Catholic supports CTA?
If I sound like I am rolling my eyes, I am. I’ve heard the same ‘it’s an attack on the Church because it might suggest that there is more to our faith than abortion!!!’ stuff about RENEW. But year after year, I see life long active parish members stand up and talk about their experiences with the program. Gasp, they generally recite Scripture and the Catechism with passion, and explain how prayer and study help reinject both into their lives…
Great, then why the need to support things like CTA?
 
It at least appears to me that those Catholcis who are most passionate for Social Justice often neglect a key component - subsidiarity, (CCC 1883-1885) vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c2a1.htm
Essentially, the lowest level of community that can deal with an issue should be enabled and allowed to do so.
You know, I often hear this argument. But I just don’t see it. I suppose it comes from the liklihood that those who are big on social justice often support government programs which assist in accomplishing this endoevaor. Yet, they are also typically the ones out there in the trenches helping the homeless, working with the poor, assisting immigrants, whatever it may be that needs to get addressed on the front lines. So their witness is for subsidiarity, indeed, but not simply subsidiarity without solidarity and support of society. Yes, it would seem that these are the ones who get it right as they see things and deal with them as they really are, understanding the true needs which exist instead of just abstractions of ideals.
 
So are you saying social justice is incompatible with democracy and/or a free market?
It transcends economic systems. It means that The State or the upper classes should not do for the poor what they themselves can do.

In essence, it rules out Communism right out, and makes Socialism kinda’ ‘iffy’ as well.

It basically follows the words of St. Paul ( 2 Thes 3:7-10)
For you yourselves know how you ought to follow our example. We were not idle when we were with you, nor did we eat anyone’s food without paying for it. On the contrary, we worked night and day, laboring and toiling so that we would not be a burden to any of you. We did this, not because we do not have the right to such help, but in order to make ourselves a model for you to follow. For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “If a man will not work, he shall not eat.”
 
R.C.I.A. was so long ago it feels and I haven’t herd anything much about the Churchs Social teachings. Could anyone tell me what they are and why we beleive them? Thanks and God bless.
The social teachings aren’t that complex: feed the poor, heal the sick, lift up the weary, etc. The thing that is important to remember is that nowhere are we told how to achieve these goals; the choice of the best means to use are left up to individuals to make. Although it is not uncommon for one side to accuse the other of rejecting Christ’s teaching and ignoring the poor (sick, in prison, …) that is almost never the case. The arguments are typically over what solutions will work best and are outside the expertise of the Church and, while individual bishops may support one or another approach, these prudential choices cannot be considered Church teachings.

Ender
 
So are you saying social justice is incompatible with democracy and/or a free market?
Not at all. OTOH, I don’t think democracy and free market necessarily go hand in hand. It seems to me that social justice and subsidiarity are perfectly compatible with free market economics. Democracy doesn’t necessarily go with Social Justice, Subsidiarity or free markets.
 
You know, I often hear this argument. But I just don’t see it. I suppose it comes from the liklihood that those who are big on social justice often support government programs which assist in accomplishing this endoevaor.
Exactly. And not just any government programs, but generally federal government programs. Looking over the lists in this thread describing social justice issues, I don’t see any that wouldn’t best be addressed by individuals, families and parishes.
Yet, they are also typically the ones out there in the trenches helping the homeless, working with the poor, assisting immigrants, whatever it may be that needs to get addressed on the front lines. So their witness is for subsidiarity, indeed, but not simply subsidiarity without solidarity and support of society.
I would argue that the past encroachments on subsidiarity started us down a slippery slope: local control and involvement preempted by further removed authorities caused individuals and families to become less involved and so there were more calls for more removed authorities to get involved in more social issues, repeat. Calling for more removed entitites to back out would allow local support to move back in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top