Z
ZemD
Guest
Thank you for your patience.
This is one of the major side effects of the Franciscan teachings. Dialogue with Protestants is over. (Unless you count the extinct mainliners.)Protestant friends and family use it as a way to prove the Church is wrong and is the devil.
Understood. I just wanted to try to understand your thinking process for the model I am building of where different groups of Catholics stand.If somebody else wants to play armchair theology pundit, they can have at it. I’m not your man.
If you’re using the forum for some kind of a research project, I hope you’re being open and ethical about that.Understood. I just wanted to try to understand your thinking process for the model I am building of where different groups of Catholics stand.
It’s not a secret or anything like that. There’s a thread on it.If you’re using the forum for some kind of a research project, I hope you’re being open and ethical about that.
I am a parent, and nothing is more important to me than raising my children with a strong foundation built upon the Faith, so as to stand up to, challenge, and change the world. I had always assumed that I could trust the Chair of Peter to be a source of clarity in a confused world. I planned to form my children to have a deep respect for the papacy for precisely that reason. When Pope Francis was elected, I sincerely hoped that he would continue the Pope’s historical role as a reliable source o…
If it’s a violation of ethics to ask people for their opinions on a web forum, I think all of us are in serious trouble.It is a violation of ethics to use people in an observation without them knowing.
So we see how it begins. If you aren’t on board with the “consensus” on Pope Francis, there’s something shady/unethical/weird about you or maybe you’re not really a Catholic, etc.Group 1 clearly has the support of the mainstream media and the popular culture. Most Catholics today are less interested in doctrine than in social justice, which naturally plays into the Group 1 narrative. In the past, whenever people argued that the Church had changed its doctrine, one could turn to the Vatican for answers, and claim the support of the Pope. But now it is the doctrine-changers that can claim papal support. In sum, 90%+ of American Catholics will be part of Group 1–and they will put immense pressure on Group 2 and their children (my children) to accept the “changes” in doctrine that Pope Francis never made.
As a result, Group 2 will be effectively forced out of the mainstream institutional Church and into “traditional” parishes and schools.
I am going to second this and say the same to you @MarysLurker.Well, I hereby do NOT give any consent for my responses on this forum to be used for your model-building, so kindly just count me out, please. If you want to read and think about what you read, find, but this “building a model” project doesn’t sit right with me.
As the other person said, this is a place where we have discussions that are supposed to be friendly and attempt to address others’ legitimate questions abou the Church. It is not a place for us to serve as guinea pigs for someone who wants to do some study about what they think is going to happen to the Church.
The death penalty is a non issue in countries that abolished it last century. Those objecting to this magisterium stance of the death penalty are a tiny subset of a subset of Catholics globally.I take it that you accept Fratelli Tutti, Amoris Laetitia, and the CCC death penalty amendment as authentic and binding exercises of the ordinary Magisterium?
As much as I hate to say this, I always feel like US people take issue with this alleged “change” to CDC (which I and many other people don’t see as being much of a change) not out of concern over Church doctrine, but because US people are uncomfortable with the idea of being unable to execute criminals they consider heinous.The death penalty is a non issue in countries that abolished it last century. Those objecting to this magisterium stance of the death penalty are a tiny subset of a subset of Catholics globally.
Yes and I get that. It is change in something deeply ingrained in your country. I can imagine a few things that would cause the same reaction here. We used to execute people here, no doubt some innocent, and some politically motivated ( especially in our Colonial days, and with the white Australia policy).As much as I hate to say this, I always feel like US people take issue with this alleged “change” to CDC (which I and many other people don’t see as being much of a change) because US people are uncomfortable with the idea of being unable to execute criminals they consider heinous.