Fr. De Lubac traced the origin of 19th century attempts to construct a humanism apart from God and Christianity, the beginnings of contemporary atheism which claims to have “moved beyond God.” In the 20th and 21st we’ve moved into a scientific materialism that parades itself as a creative individualism. There is no institutional memory for atheism that corresponds to what the Catholic Church does for its believers. This leaves most atheists I know free to deny any and all sources. It’s a shame because if this were available in some form, it might help those not to be seduced yet by the latest incarnation of an old old heresy. Read this, one would like to say, learn your sordid, blood-soaked past.
“The three persons Fr. De Lubac focuses on are Feuerbach, who greatly influenced Marx; Nietzsche, who represents nihilism; and Comte, who is the father of all forms of positivism. He then shows that the only one who really responded to this ideology was Dostoevsky, a kind of prophet who criticizes in his novels this attempt to have a society without God. Despite their historical and scholarly appearance, de Lubac’s work clearly refers to the present.”
When I read this I really felt that atheistic humanism still existed but the more I converse with atheists, particularly the twenty or thirty something college graduates, I realize they have no connection with the atheistic humanism that Fr. De Lubac traced here. Most are totally unaware of it. Their teachers would know of it and most of them probably subscribed to it at one point. The newer atheists are a TV/internet phenomena, more Hollywood than literary, riding on the faux intellectualism of a scientific conceit that one sees in Richard Dawkins. Bill Maher has created more of these lost souls than we could possibly imagine.
As is my habit, reading selections follow:
You can continue with the reading selections here
payingattentiontothesky.com/2009/09/10/book-recommendation-the-drama-of-atheistic-humanism-henri-de-lubac-s-j/
In Christ,
dj