P
pnewton
Guest
Yes. That is the word for what I did: a comparison.
The fact of the right itself being there makes this virtue quite correct and real.This virtue is an artificial virtue, since constitutional rights such as the right to bear arms is an arbitrary and artificial right.
The right is legally real, but it is still only made up by the founders. Other things they made up have changed already. This could too.LeafByNiggle:
The fact of the right itself being there makes this virtue quite correct and real.This virtue is an artificial virtue, since constitutional rights such as the right to bear arms is an arbitrary and artificial right.
The right to life and liberty are not so…and I am quite certain the right to bear arms figures directly in insuring those are not easily removed.The right is legally real, but it is still only made up by the founders.
While I agree that the right to bear arms is particular to the Constitution, it is rooted in the right to legitimate self-defense, which is part of Catholic teaching as well. While this would not justify the right to any and all kind of guns, it might be argued that at least what is needed for the defense on oneself and one’s family is a right. My objection to those who jump on this moral teaching is how a gun, something that defends one and one’s family by taking the life of the one who threatens them, is preferred over deadbolts and an alarm system, protection that does not take life.The right is legally real, but it is still only made up by the founders.
Here’s what the right to life ensures: The right to use a gun for self defense if you have one handy. It does not ensure your right to buy one.LeafByNiggle:
The right to life and liberty are not so…and I am quite certain the right to bear arms figures directly in insuring those are not easily removed.The right is legally real, but it is still only made up by the founders.
If you don’t have the right to buy one, it follows you don’t have the right to use or posses one. That’s how our law works.Here’s what the right to life ensures: The right to use a gun for self defense if you have one handy. It does not ensure your right to buy one.
That’s right. Their is no absolute right to possess a gun under natural law either.LeafByNiggle:
If you don’t have the right to buy one, it follows you don’t have the right to use or posses one. That’s how our law works.Here’s what the right to life ensures: The right to use a gun for self defense if you have one handy. It does not ensure your right to buy one.
Back when the second amendment was written, it was legal to own a cannon.Back when the Constitution was written there were no assault type weapons. They used flint-lock musket rifles.
Say, rather, that the alternatives to crime come harder for them.Gun violence in USA poor black communities is different and how I see it (from what little I have seen on tv) is that these kids need successful black leaders to speak to them and challenge them.
Also so many of these kids seem to have absent fathers.The boys have no good male role models,they are surrounded by friends doing crime etc-the crime life comes easily for them.
Very true. One small way to help break the “prison cycle” is to stop incarcerating people who have not yet been convicted, sometimes of minor offenses, but are unable to pay bail. A lot of useless sitting around behind bars when they could be home building up family role models.Private businesses and Government needs to put more money into training these young men to be achievers and leaders,inspire others and break the “prison cycle”.
Yes,sorry.I wrote this quickly and didn’t give it enough thought how to word it more appropriately.Say, rather, that the alternatives to crime come harder for them.