L
L_Amoneti
Guest
Wow. I don’t even…what motivates a comment like that?
The case referenced is in Australia I believe and it’s about one case where life is jeopardized. I do agree it’s a broader issue but why not provide an exemption here?Unfortunately the US can not let every person, disabled child or not into our country and support them with tax payer money.
I think we ought to give foreign aid the benefit of the doubt. Yes, we should be careful about propping up bad governments but some our items, particularly the health expenditures are literally life savers like providing vaccines to prevent deaths from preventable diseases or treating diseases like Malaria and H.I.V.We could spend more wisely with the vast amount of foreign aid we send to many countries each year, to ensure that money improves the lives of the citizens of those countries.
What level of disability do you think warrants automatic permanent residency?Wow. I don’t even…what motivates a comment like that?
We’ve only read one side to the story, obviously written for emotional appeal. It’s up to the authorities in Australia to evaluate if the travel risk is that severe. Also since we don’t know their legal country of residence, it’s hard to comment on available medical care standards.The case referenced is in Australia I believe and it’s about one case where life is jeopardized. I do agree it’s a broader issue but why not provide an exemption here?
Maybe they need to be the champion of change in their home country,Even if there available medical facilities (and if so, can they access/afford it)
Is it a bit much to expect one person to change things especially if they’re from a marginalized population? And right now, we’re talking about accepting a few cases like individual exceptions necessary to people’s lives, why not allow for that, isn’t deporting them going too extreme?Maybe they need to be the champion of change in their home country,
How do you think each social justice issue was addressed in the US or Australia?Is it a bit much to expect one person to change things especially if they’re from a marginalized population? And right now, we’re talking about accepting a few cases like individual exceptions necessary to people’s lives, why not allow for that, isn’t deporting them going too extreme?
What they agreed to was for humanitarian reasons to permit not only the sick but a person accompanying them to stay in the countries for free medical care.every other OECD country went through those issues in the past and all to varying degrees did agree to provide the services for their citizens, but not for all of asia.
You are confirming dialysis is a free service offered. However, I expect there are limits on what services they will provide with residency, and which they won’t.Hemodialysis
My country has no limit on medical asylum if the condition is life threatening and the person under-age, this applies to a total of 6 African countries. Families are welcome to relocate with the child. (It’s not about expelling them, they are invited to move here !!!)adgloriam:
You are confirming dialysis is a free service offered. However, I expect there are limits on what services they will provide with residency, and which they won’t.Hemodialysis
We are both talking about your “IF” statement. I’m sure there is often some disagreement on whether the condition is life threatening or not, on whether the services back home are sufficient to meet needs. I see you also exclude adults? Do you deport them to die at home?My country has no limit on medical asylum if the condition is life threatening and the person under-age, "
I asked you very simple questions, I didn’t make assumptions.Your assumptions about my point of view are baseless and unwarranted. Please come again.
If I was Australian, I’d sign the petition.I would just like to mention that a number of these families being targeted (like the one in my original post and below) have come here legally on work visa.