That’s a Latin term which means “of one’s own right”, or, able to manage one’s own affairs, if you will. In this context it refers to Catholic Churches of various rites which are entitled to their own traditions and customs. My husband is Ruthenian, which is one of those Eastern Catholic Churches, all in communion with Rome.What exactly is a Sui luris church? I’m not familiar with the term.
Thanks!
This would not work because requests for former Anglican priests are reviewed on a case-by-case basis. One does not automatically have the right to be ordained, and anything that even remotely appeared to be a case as stated above would likely be declined.So I have always wanted to ask this question. Being an American and not being allowed to be a priest in the US how much of a sin would it be to keep you heart catholic, but convert to Anglicanism, then become a married Anglican priest then convert back to Catholicism? This is a hypothetical mind you.
Only the Latin Rite does not have married priests. Safe to say it is only a matter of time before they do too.The Maronites, Ukranians and Romainians. Also the Indian Syro-Malaber.
I think they all have married priests coming from their background. But I am not sure on that.
Why not sonsider joining an Eastern Rite? I have a friend who wanted to marry and also had a passion to be a priest and became an Eastern Rite Catholic. Married with 4 kids now and a priest. He loves it!!This would not work because requests for former Anglican priests are reviewed on a case-by-case basis. One does not automatically have the right to be ordained, and anything that even remotely appeared to be a case as stated above would likely be declined.
Oh, they do. Fr. Scott Medlock, for one.Only the Latin Rite does not have married priests. Safe to say it is only a matter of time before they do too.
Hoping that your hypothetical question has no base in reality, the answer is mortally sinful and the very beginning of a life devoted to mortal sin. Yet you know that already, yes?So I have always wanted to ask this question. Being an American and not being allowed to be a priest in the US how much of a sin would it be to keep you heart catholic, but convert to Anglicanism, then become a married Anglican priest then convert back to Catholicism? This is a hypothetical mind you.
yeah I do, i actually commented about it a page earlier.Hoping that your hypothetical question has no base in reality, the answer is mortally sinful and the very beginning of a life devoted to mortal sin. Yet you know that already, yes?
There’s still the option of non-latin rites. Many latin rite RC’s have become members of non-latin churches.Hoping that your hypothetical question has no base in reality, the answer is mortally sinful and the very beginning of a life devoted to mortal sin. Yet you know that already, yes?
I do not think a man may change rites because they want to be married and a priest.There’s still the option of non-latin rites. Many latin rite RC’s have become members of non-latin churches.
To paraphrase from the Vatican II post-concilliar documents, it’s not an invalid reason, but it also is not sufficient as a reason.I do not think a man may change rites because they want to be married and a priest.
Your Anglican orders wouldn’t be valid and the Church, as a firm rule, does not ordain men who have left her to become ministers elsewhere.So I have always wanted to ask this question. Being an American and not being allowed to be a priest in the US how much of a sin would it be to keep you heart catholic, but convert to Anglicanism, then become a married Anglican priest then convert back to Catholicism? This is a hypothetical mind you.
I’m somewhat surprised by this because the general rule (which does, indeed, admit of exceptions) seems to be that Eastern ordinaries will not ordain former Latins, precisely to avoid men transferring enrollment for the sole purpose of becoming married priests. If they were fairly certain that the man had transferred out of a genuine attachment to their worship tradition and also just happened to discern a call to the priesthood, then they would gladly take him on, but the situation you described just didn’t sound like that (I know, in 20 words or less…).Why not sonsider joining an Eastern Rite? I have a friend who wanted to marry and also had a passion to be a priest and became an Eastern Rite Catholic. Married with 4 kids now and a priest. He loves it!!
It is not that easy to change rites and the person might actually be denied based on that reason if that is the only one.I do not think a man may change rites because they want to be married and a priest.
THis has been mentioned many times ( I am not certain on this forum though).So I have always wanted to ask this question. Being an American and not being allowed to be a priest in the US how much of a sin would it be to keep you heart catholic, but convert to Anglicanism, then become a married Anglican priest then convert back to Catholicism? This is a hypothetical mind you.
Your are right and thanks for answering. This cannot be said enough times. I wouldn’t have done it, but have heard this talked about on another thread.Sounds like playing with fire to me.
This would probably come out when you came back into the Church attempting to apply to seminary for a diocese. The Bishop would likely refuse you. When married and converted ex-Anglican priests seek priestly formation in the Catholic Church, their bishops are to review them and, on a case-by-case basis, may admit them to formation and eventually ordination. In the hypothetical you describe, the vast majority of bishops would turn down the prospective priest out of suspicion for his motives.So I have always wanted to ask this question. Being an American and not being allowed to be a priest in the US how much of a sin would it be to keep you heart catholic, but convert to Anglicanism, then become a married Anglican priest then convert back to Catholicism? This is a hypothetical mind you.
.I’m somewhat surprised by this because the general rule (which does, indeed, admit of exceptions) seems to be that Eastern ordinaries will not ordain former Latins, precisely to avoid men transferring enrollment for the sole purpose of becoming married priests. If they were fairly certain that the man had transferred out of a genuine attachment to their worship tradition and also just happened to discern a call to the priesthood, then they would gladly take him on, but the situation you described just didn’t sound like that (I know, in 20 words or less…)
I wouldn’t call it extraordinarily rare, there are more than a hundred in the UK due to the CofE’s ordination of women in the 1990s.I believe the technical answer would be all Catholic rites. Even though it may be extraordinarily rare, a dispensation could be granted as being married is not a total impediment to the reception of Holy Orders.