A
adawgj
Guest
Probably the wording of things.
For example Mother of God
For example Mother of God
Well, the Lutheran reformers understood it.Probably the wording of things.
For example Mother of God
Thanks for clarifying from the Lutheran perspective.Well, the Lutheran reformers understood it.
From our confessions:
Of all of them, ISTM this is the easiest, if one understands the Incarnation.
- On account of this personal union and communion of the natures, Mary, the most blessed Virgin, bore not a mere man, but, as the angel [Gabriel] testifies, such a man as is truly the Son of the most high God, who showed His divine majesty even in His mother’s womb, inasmuch as He was born of a virgin, with her virginity inviolate. **Therefore she is truly the mother of God, ***and nevertheless remained a virgin.
However, your point is well taken. A better example might be “Mediatrix of All Graces”.
Jon
Can you explain, from a Lutheran perspective, what is the role of the communion of saints?Quote:
Originally Posted by coopnann
A woman at our church, who has now been catholic for several years, used to be a Presbyterian minister. She said to me that Christians who are not Catholic do not have a developed theology of the communion of saints, so doing anything with Mary does not make sense to them.
My close friend who is Methodist, and her father is a Methodist minister, asked me something about Mary, and I asked her what Methodists thoughts of Mary are. She said she, and her church doesn’t really think much, they just remember her at Christmas.
But I think what the lady at our church said really seems to make sense to me, because if you don’t have the communion of saints where we are all still family with God, whether living here on earth, or in heaven, or purgatory bound for heaven, then Mary doesn’t fit in at all.
Perhaps she should speak for herself, or her former communion if she wishes. I think Lutherans have a reasonable understanding of the Communion of Saints, as do Anglicans generally, and Orthodox.
Jon
Instead of me explaining it, here is a link to an excellent explanation.Can you explain, from a Lutheran perspective, what is the role of the communion of saints?
Posted from Catholic.com App for Android
Thank you for the link. It is clear what the communion of saints is and how we experience them…but it does not explain if they have a role in the Church.Instead of me explaining it, here is a link to an excellent explanation.
trinitychurchandschool.com/communion-of-saints/
Jon
One role would be prayer. We pray for each other here. They in the Church Triumphant pray for us, the Church Militant.Thank you for the link. It is clear what the communion of saints is and how we experience them…but it does not explain if they have a role in the Church.
Jesus intended us to be a family. Families have mothers and fathers and children. And while we are all children of God, even Jesus since he was human, still God has a place for each of us within the family that we should rejoice in instead of trying to push such honors aside, as if they don’t exist. God exalts whom he pleases and brings down those he decides deserve it. The Church acknowledges all that her children have done in her service from the highest to the lowest. Such acknowledgement is not setting any of us up for worship, but she does recognize the work of God in her members and rightfully celebrates it, be it Mary or anyone else.
For me personally, the issue isn’t with the more traditional Christian communities. It is with the Baptists and Evangelicals who aggressively accuse Catholics of excessively honoring Mary, even though all Marian doctrines are plain truths in the eyes of any well-informed Christian.It seems in regards to RC that the underlyinf current is that Protestants need to pay more attention to the Blessed Virgin than we do-
We honor Her as the God Bearer - she is considered a major Saint in our Church-what more do you want us to do?
![]()
[Bolded by me]Living in the Bay Area of California, my wife and I go to the Mission Churches as much as possible. One thing that I noticed is that there is much more emphasis on Mary than on Christ. It is this very emphasis of Mary that causes jitters with Lutherans. As far as praying to her or to the Saints, there is no evidence that they hear us but I believe that they do pray for us.
Is there a difference in the Church Triumphant praying for the Church Militant as a whole vs something more specific?One role would be prayer. We pray for each other here. They in the Church Triumphant pray for us, the Church Militant.
Jon
A number of years back I was diagnosed and treated for prostate cancer. Since then I have kept a likeness of St Peregrine in my wallet. While I do not pray to him, I do pray to God to hear his prAyers on behalf of those of us with cancer.Is there a difference in the Church Triumphant praying for the Church Militant as a whole vs something more specific?
With sincerity and in charity I have to ask, how does the Mission emphasize Mary more than Christ? Not in the Mass, surely. The whole of the Mass is centered around Christ, not Mary.Living in the Bay Area of California, my wife and I go to the Mission Churches as much as possible. One thing that I noticed is that there is much more emphasis on Mary than on Christ. It is this very emphasis of Mary that causes jitters with Lutherans. As far as praying to her or to the Saints, there is no evidence that they hear us but I believe that they do pray for us.
Worship offered to God is sacrificial in nature. It is only to God that we re-present the one sacrifice of Christ and to no one else. Merely praising a saint is not worship anymore than praising a good football player for being good at his game. We do not offer sacrifices to football players because they are good at passing or tackling or whatever else for which they may excel, but we do offer them praise for doing it well. Do you see what I mean?I still have never read a good explanation of what the practical difference is between latria and hyperdulia. If there was a sound understanding and firm establishment of what the differences are, there would be less jitters I think.
I must point out that most Marian doctrines are not plain truths. Protestants, in general, honor Mary as the first and most perfect Christian witness who in complete obedience and surrender to God’s will accepted the great responsibility of becoming the mother of Jesus. Other Marian doctrine such as her Perpetual Virginity, Assumption, Intersession, and terms like co-redemptrix and mediator of all graces cause serious problems for us as they are not found in sacred scripture and therefore dependent upon Tradition and papal decree which we cannot accept. In addition they begin to place Mary and Jesus on a more equal level ascribing to her many attributes which should, in Protestant thought, belong only to Jesus. I think most Catholics feel that Protestants have something against Mary but in fact she is loved, honored, and held in highest respect by us; we love her too…just differently.For me personally, the issue isn’t with the more traditional Christian communities. It is with the Baptists and Evangelicals who aggressively accuse Catholics of excessively honoring Mary, even though all Marian doctrines are plain truths in the eyes of any well-informed Christian.
You say they are not plain truths - but is that really an unbiased statement or does it flow from your point of view as a non-catholic 00 years into this great schism and from what you are taught?I must point out that most Marian doctrines are not plain truths. Protestants, in general, honor Mary as the first and most perfect Christian witness who in complete obedience and surrender to God’s will accepted the great responsibility of becoming the mother of Jesus.
Really - are you aware that all of the original Reformers held that Mary was a perpetual virgin? That this belief that she was not - is something that came out of the “Enlightenment” movement - which is hardly Christian in its very core … but that has been coupled with the point in time that the Church dogmatically declared the Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary to deny what has been long held by all of Christianity … the fact that a dogmatic decree was made in a certain year does not mean that no Christian believed it prior to that point. Mary’s title as the Mother of God was the direct result of the Church fighting the Arian heresy - those that denied the divinity of Christ … when the Church theologically proved, declared and stated as an article of faith that Jesus had two natures - human and divine - then Mary has to be the Mother of God - she gave birth to Christ … your [ie Protestantism] turning away from authentic Christian belief has led to nothing but further division and bizarre beliefs - one example is Bishop Spong - who now says that Mary was not even a Virgin when she conceived Jesus - but that Jesus is most probably the result of a rape by a roman soldierOther Marian doctrine such as her Perpetual Virginity, Assumption, Intersession, and terms like co-redemptrix and mediator of all graces cause serious problems for us as they are not found in sacred scripture and therefore dependent upon Tradition and papal decree which we cannot accept.
You are correct - this is only in Protestant thought - it is not Catholic in thought or practice … you made this up - like Bishop Spong … it sounds good when you say it - and the more you say it the more you believe itIn addition they begin to place Mary and Jesus on a more equal level ascribing to her many attributes which should, in Protestant thought, belong only to Jesus.
I think most Catholics feel that Protestants have something against Mary but in fact she is loved, honored, and held in highest respect by us; we love her too…just differently.
You say they are not plain truths - but is that really an unbiased statement or does it flow from your point of view as a non-catholic 00 years into this great schism and from what you are taught?
Really - are you aware that all of the original Reformers held that Mary was a perpetual virgin? That this belief that she was not - is something that came out of the “Enlightenment” movement - which is hardly Christian in its very core … but that has been coupled with the point in time that the Church dogmatically declared the Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary to deny what has been long held by all of Christianity … the fact that a dogmatic decree was made in a certain year does not mean that no Christian believed it prior to that point. Mary’s title as the Mother of God was the direct result of the Church fighting the Arian heresy - those that denied the divinity of Christ … when the Church theologically proved, declared and stated as an article of faith that Jesus had two natures - human and divine - then Mary has to be the Mother of God - she gave birth to Christ … your [ie Protestantism] turning away from authentic Christian belief has led to nothing but further division and bizarre beliefs - one example is Bishop Spong - who now says that Mary was not even a Virgin when she conceived Jesus - but that Jesus is most probably the result of a rape by a roman soldier
You are correct - this is only in Protestant thought - it is not Catholic in thought or practice … you made this up - like Bishop Spong … it sounds good when you say it - and the more you say it the more you believe it
No Mary - No Jesus … Know Mary - Know Jesus … Mary always points to Christ … In Cana she told them to “do whatever He tells you” - good advice … At the annunciation she answered God’s request for her very life with “Let is be done unto me according to your Word” - the proper response we are to have for God’s call in our life.
- I don’t think you have something against Mary - I do not know you … but the vast majority of protestants * ignore Mary and relegate her to a vessel - an incubator - host that carried Jesus for 9 months and took care of him until he could enter into the world … and they believe that he held her in little esteem - referring to her as “woman” at the marriage feast in Cana and by saying that his family was those who believed and did what God commands - when told that his family was outside the tent and wanted to speak with him … trust me - those passages are used to show that Mary is not important - it may not be hate - but it is definitely not respect - and Protestants are not calling her “Blessed in every generation” -
This same type of faith and action is also what Jesus referred to when his family was outside the tent - Mary answered God’s call - Mary is Jesus’ mother and ours - He is her first born - we are his brothers by adoption - and He entrusted us to her while He was hanging on the cross … have you taken her into you home and cared for her - accepted her as your spiritual Mother? Shown her respect, look to her for guidance and advice?
Mary is the best example of discipleship we have to model our lives after …*
I can see that you’re very passionate about this. I wouldn’t say it’s an emotional thing for us though, we just want to make sure we’re always looking to Christ. If Catholics feel that looking to Mary is one way of looking to Christ that’s good. If Protestants feel more comfortable loving Mary and respecting her yet looking straight to Christ then that’s good too.
Romans 14 is quite beautiful and if more read it and understood it we would have greater unity.