What dear friend, do you find strange about Catholicism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi. I have a feeling that someone will get to this before I do, but if not then I’ll try to post something about it later.

For the moment, can you explain why you think that

‘On their hands they will bear you up,
lest you strike your foot against a stone.’

is related?
I would like to read the context of this Scripture’s source, but my thoughts are that the relation is in the condition of pre-fallen man. One of the benefits may be what this Scripture mentions.
 
The only thing I can think of that may relate to this is the Scripture which the devil quotes to Jesus when being tempted…

‘On their hands they will bear you up,
lest you strike your foot against a stone.’

Not sure where this is from… but I see it as being fundamentally different than being physically and bodily different. Rather it is having more to do with divine protection regarding physical dangers.
The devil quotes this scripture from Psalm 91:11-12 to Jesus during the temptation.
 
Hi rc,

Been thinking (oh oh), if it was non-understandable, why do folks continue say they took it literally ? How do we know , if non-understandable for them ? I mean they would have found it a hard saying either way, literal or figurative. Blessings
Good question ben!

This is my understanding of what Peter, and the disciples who stayed with Jesus, believed and why they stayed with Him after this challenging Doctrine from the Lord…

They, as we too, believed that Jesus’ Words and even physical being was equal to the Word of God. They decidedly chose to venerate Him to the same level of Sacred Scripture.
 
Thanks, when I was in Europe we visited numerous elaborate churches. I have to admit it did not do much for me, I rather was aghast at the thought of peasants being taxed to the hilt to build golden edifices. I am afraid fancy churches often keep people at bay since churches of all denominations have a (maybe not always justified) reputation of money,money money

It is my take that He came to fulfill the Law and that He was the ultimate sacrifice. I tend to beleive that He did not come to start a new religion , rather to change men’s hearts and make His dwelling there.
Why would you not want to make God’s house beautiful. Was not God pleased with Abel at the nice things Abel sacrificed to God? God deserves the best and I have no problem paying for Him to have a beautiful house
 
Hi. I have a feeling that someone will get to this before I do, but if not then I’ll try to post something about it later.

For the moment, can you explain why you think that

‘On their hands they will bear you up,
lest you strike your foot against a stone.’

is related?
P.S. You can read all of Psalm 91 here. (Although, come to think of it, my mind goes more to the song, because I heard it a lot in the 80s.)
 
Please read all of 488. Slowly…

Oh. And while we’re at it, please explain to me how to reconcile man’s free will with God’s Providence. Thanks.

Fran
Hi Fran,

“Predestined” is used in the context of PRE-KNOWLEDGE of an event; NOT a mandated obedience to one:)

God Bless you, and Mary Christmas
 
It strikes me with interest this morning that Mary is professing God as her personal Saviour!
I’m curious if this is something you were not aware of? Or are you assuming this means that she was an actual sinner? We believe she was saved through Christ from Original sin, and she relied on His grace to avoid sin throughout her life. This is no less being saved by the Lord than any of her offspring.
 
Why would you not want to make God’s house beautiful. Was not God pleased with Abel at the nice things Abel sacrificed to God? God deserves the best and I have no problem paying for Him to have a beautiful house
Wow, I made that post in what seems like a long time ago! Sure I appreciate beautiful churches, I get into a lot of them. I feel uncomfortable though with opulence.

Absolutely God deserves the best, and the best we can give Him is our heart since He makes His dwelling within us not in a house made with human hands.

I am going from memory on this but I think Abel offering was acceptable to God because his heart was right not because what He offered was nice.
 
What scriptures tell us that she was immaculately conceived? Could not God the Father have been omniscient enough to have created a perfect space for Jesus’ conception without having an immaculate conception? See this doesn’t make sense to me at all -
As I have taught repeatedly; on this thread and others; it is absolutely impossible that Sola Scriptura be a fact; a reality; a part of GOD"S truth.

The Bible dear friends is a CATHOLIC BOOK; which would not exit were it not for Christ Catholic Church.🙂

It was Catholics who selected the Jewish OT books to be included in the Bible

It was Catholics who AUTHORED the Entire NT

It was Catholics who assembled and Codified the bibles 73 books [which Luter some 1,500 years Later cut to “63.”

Read please the last to verses in John chapters 20 & 21. John teaches IN THE BIBLE [emphasis not shouting] that NOT everything is in the bible by intent; not accident.

The Church Jesus established begin right after His Ascension; that was 33-36 AD [after death]. The Bible was not fully authored until the END of the 1st or early 2nd centuries.

HOW then did the infant Church [singular Mt 16:18] teach and grow? BY word of Mouth as they had traditionally been taught for the OT books and teachings]

ADD then to this dynamic a high rate of illiteracy [may have included some of the Apostles?] & and include the sacristy and high cost of writing materials

Even then the bibles books were NOT assembled as “a book.” They were just scattered letters and teachings. So there was a prolonged period after the Church had already been formed when no bible existed.
What scriptures tell us that she was immaculately conceived? ** Could not God** the Father have been omniscient enough to have created a perfect space for Jesus’ conception without having an immaculate conception? See this doesn’t make sense to me at all -
**
Certainly God COULD HAVE:) BUT that is NOT what GOD choose to do**👍
So now the BIG questions: what does this have to do with a Christmas message; and what more specifically does this have to do with Mary?

In all of creation for all time; God choose and God permitted only one person; one soul, to be born in an absolute sense “perfect.” This was not something Mary “merited” so much as being a gift from Jesus Her son; who merited this grace for Her. Not just ten fingers and toes perfect; BUT perfect in every possible way. Only Mary, having been given the call; having been granted the graces necessary; would be both born without the stain of any sin and then choose freely never to sin. Mary then becomes the human model that we each can, and each ought to with God’s grace; emulate. If we don’t set high our sights, we can never attain the higher things.

**Hail Mary, [Lk. 1:28]
Full of Grace [Lk. 1:28]
The Lord is with thee [Lk 1:27]
Blessed are you among all women [Lk 1:42]
And Blessed in the fruit of your womb: Jesus [Lk. 1;42]
Holy Mary [Lk.1: 28]
Mother of God 1:35
Pray for us sinners [our catholic petition]
Now and at the hour of our death
Amen” **

God’s greater purposes for the Incarnation include the possibilities of man knowing God in ways far more personal and intimate than ever before and therefore far more demanding. And of course to become man’s Redeemer; and if we fulfill the very reason for our existence; our Savior. Towards this end Jesus gave to humanity His Mother to be our Mother; knowing that She could, and that She would bring many Souls to Him, and to their personal salvation. [Jn 19: 25-27]

Mary Christman my friend**
 
What scripture says that scriptures contain it all. I can quote scripture that says that not everything is in scripture
Scripture doesn’t declare it out right but there are hints.
The Angel addresses her in a very formal way Hail Full of grace as if that is her name.
There are some translations that translate it as highly favored one while at the same time In Ephesians 1:6 translate is as grace. This site explains it better than I can
Why Catholics believe in the Immaculate Conception

God could choose to do anything He wants but He chose to do it this way maybe because it is His mom? What would you do for your mother?
Nicely done my friend! Thanks:)
 
Thanks , but I meant did Jesus have a mortal body like Adam before the fall or as I think , a body more like you and I, after the fall ? (one would think Adam’s mortal body was perfect, free from any defect, dna/genes ect…).
Sorry:blush: I missed that great point.

Before his death and resurrection Mortal like OURS

After the Resurrection more lie Adams; BUT now completely perfected in every possible way:thumbsup:
 
I’m curious if this is something you were not aware of? Or are you assuming this means that she was an actual sinner? We believe she was saved through Christ from Original sin, and she relied on His grace to avoid sin throughout her life. This is no less being saved by the Lord than any of her offspring.
I was aware but it never stuck out to me like it did just now. I am not building any theology on it and I can understand your explanation as well. I could use more clarification on your last sentence.

Actually what was really in my mind was the title of another thread here, “what is the history of the term Personal Lord and Saviour.” Seems like Mary was way ahead of anything attributed to “those Protestants.”
 
Hi PJM, Strange but the conclusion might be the same that being in truth or in right church is thru grace.Strange because he starts out saying grace is dependent on truth,as in making grace conditional,a contradiction.

Blessings
Because God Himself teaches: I AM the way & I AM thee Truth; what Father shares is correct. Grace DOES depend on Truth for GOD IS Truth. Amen? Amen.

IMO [not a church teaching here]

This fact of an absolutely necessary relationship between “truth and grace” is born out in the multiplicity and variety of Protestant churches and differing sets of faith beliefs.

Because Faith stem from and must flow through TRUTH [always singular per defined issue]; a lack of faith stems from a lack of grace.

God’s Faith has to be “one” because even God cannot hold contrary; often contradictory positions on the same defined issues.🙂

God Bless you and Mary Christmas
 
I guess this is more of a question, but here it goes, who gets the big communion wafer? I am not certain, having only been to one mass, but I think that is the thing the priest has in his hands when he does the general blessing over the eucharist. Is it transubstantiated or does it have to be ingested to transubstantiate?
🙂 I’ve never been asked that one before. THANKS

ALL Communion bread is unleavened [like the bread of Passover]

The size is incidental As Jesus is in every waver and every part no matter how small or how large [its a mystery joined to a Miracle]

The larger sizes [small, medium and large" ] are a personal option of the priest or Bishop.

The Medium and Large Host are used to STRESS the Real Presence of Jesus; but are not mandated or essential for Jesus to actually be “made Present.”

The medium host can be totally consumed by the priest [presider]
; or as is more often the case [personal choice] broken into four pcs; 1 of 2 consumed by the priest; and the balance distributed as Holy Communion.

The Largest host can be broken into 8 sections and the above distribution made as a personal choice. There is NO additional benefit for receiving a fragmented host or a small normal cCommunion host. Its the One and Same Jesus always:thumbsup:

God Bless you, and thanks for asking,

Patrick
 
Good explanation however around here the Blood is distributed to the congregation as well. I have been to many different dioceses and parishes. I haven’t been to a Mass where the congregation don’t receive under both species.
BUT:) They do exist; I have been to several of them:thumbsup:
 
I was aware but it never stuck out to me like it did just now. I am not building any theology on it and I can understand your explanation as well. I could use more clarification on your last sentence.

Actually what was really in my mind was the title of another thread here, “what is the history of the term Personal Lord and Saviour.” Seems like Mary was way ahead of anything attributed to “those Protestants.”
Well, I think protestants came up with, or at least popularized, the idea of putting the word “personal” at the beginning. Otherwise they stole it from us Catholics. 🙂 🙂 🙂
 
I was aware but it never stuck out to me like it did just now. I am not building any theology on it and I can understand your explanation as well. I could use more clarification on your last sentence.
Ok, that’s a good attitude! My last sentence means that she was saved in a similar way of all those who keep the commandments of her Son. Though her’s was also unique in that she was prevented from the effects of Original sin, even from her conception. This means the Lord was with her, in the Christian sense, from the beginning. She was redeemed at her very beginning because she was to be the first to receive the grace of Jesus. All who are subsequently redeemed are done so with the fact that she believed and consented to Christ’s coming into the world.
Actually what was really in my mind was the title of another thread here, “what is the history of the term Personal Lord and Saviour.” Seems like Mary was way ahead of anything attributed to “those Protestants.”
That’s very true. She is unique in her motherhood to all who personally believe and keep His Word. She is like the whole Church, but also like an individual member. She is mysterious in her relation to Jesus! So bound to Him and yet part of us all.
 
Thank you for your effort .Like the first part. Solid and straight up .Would have to think more on sacramental grace, though it is explained very well. Seems like you earn it on first look.

Blessings and have a Merry Mary Christmas, and may your flesh be wide awake to midnight Mass it, candle vigil and all.
And also you you my friend,

Patrick
 
I agree completely, and am content to leave it as a mystery. I am just asking that we refrain from contradicting the Church in the process.

This may be very true. She may think in Italian, and the language may be why there are misunderstandings. On the other hand, when confronted about some of the posts, a defense is presented that makes it appear that it is not a misunderstanding.

It is problematic to other readers who are looking for Catholic Answers to read posts by a Catholic Catechist that contradict the Catechism. It has to be confronted. If it is just left hanging there, it can cause a stumbling block to the faithful and those seeking the Truth.
Agree completely!

God Bless and Mary Christmas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top