No…clearly, the ultimate and sole authority for wiping the nose is kleenex alone. You just take the kleenex and add the lotions of men on top of it!I can’t even believe that anyone could have a different opinion on this.
NO ONE can dislike kleenex with lotion.
That’s just wrong.
It depends upon what you mean by “kleenex alone”. I know some folks claim that, but what they really mean is “kleenex and chicken soup, as long as the chicken soup doesn’t interfere with the kleenex.”
It depends on whether the Puffs has the lotions of men added to it as well. If the Puffs is such that it agrees with the kleenex, then we can be assured that the Puffs is handed on by the same tissue makers. Otherwise, if the Puffs has different lotions in it, then it must be rejected as having any authenticity.It depends upon what you mean by “kleenex alone”. I know some folks claim that, but what they really mean is “kleenex and chicken soup, as long as the chicken soup doesn’t interfere with the kleenex.”
And some folks claim it’s “kleenex alone”, but they’ll also, peculiarly, accept Puffs.
So I don’t get the kleenex alone people.
Clearly. I think they started their own denomination when they disagreed with the Sola Kleenex folks way back in '08.
I think Calgar got banned…not really sure why…I though he was trying to find his way…let us indeed pray for him.
:I am in!
You all are cracking me up. I now have as many fans as Frasier Crane’s internet fan club, which is a total of 3.I always feel bad when things feel unfinished with a forum member. At this point, I agree that we must pray for him.
All jokes aside----However misguided, most of these Christians believe they are faithfully serving Christ. They are concerned for the “souls of the lost.” So, they go to extremes to “win souls” for Christ. They do not understand salvation outside of an emotional one-time experience, which proves to be empty in the long run. Maybe they are trying to fill this emptiness by focusing on what they see wrong in those who believe differently than they do.
Coptic, Coptic, Coptic (I’m almost too tired to type that 3 times)Anna,
Scott Hahn says this it this way…they are Sincere…Sincerely wrong…
Just joking about the kleenex.
And you know this because . . . you know “most Catholics in the pew” throughout the world and are able to judge them personally? How are come-lately Anglicans “more Catholic than most Catholics” when they reject the Church founded by Christ for the salvation of the world and prefer one made by a king in the 16th century who wanted to divorce his lawful wife and marry another? No offense intended to you or Anna, but that’s the historical truth of the matter. This is off the topic of this thread.Anna, news flash. You are already more Catholic than most Catholics in the pew.
Jim Dandy, I think guanophore was just making a tongue-in-cheek comment, but surely you wouldn’t deny that many Catholics have been poorly catechized (such that they are able to adequately defend their faith, or worse, fail to follow the Church’s teachings on faith and morals).
That is not really accurate Jimdandy. Henry sought an annulment, not a divorce. And it would likely have happened if it were not for the fact that Catherine of Aragon was not the aunt of the King of Spain. Henry was only allowed to marry Catherine due to a special dispensation from the Pope.
Jim,
JustaServant,Just joking about the kleenex.
In fairness, there is nothing wrong with going to an altar (or bench or chair or whatever) and kneeling in prayer.
I have only been in one Brethren church in my life, and I was impressed by the fact that the congregation gets on their knees during prayer. I don’t know if this is the norm, in Brethren churches, but they were actually doing what the word ‘worship’ means.
Years ago I visited a small Baptist church that had been converted from either a Catholic or Episcopal church. The pastor bragged how he removed the altar rails and kneelers because “kneeling was Catholic”.