A
alfredo
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76a37/76a371ceb6a0d5092298602f15d22bca8473013c" alt="40.png"
Correct.i would say though, that it is WAAAYYY too easy to get an annulment and the effects are still the same (steps, halfs, joint-custody, child support, etc.). maybe some protestants were the originators but the attitude of many catholics here in america (i don’t suggest this is a worldwide thing) has caused annulments to be something attainable by all. although it is not as easy to get an annulment as it is a divorce, it is still possible for many who do not qualify for one to receive one (IMO).
Non Catholic Sheila Kennedy quotes her Catholic husband Joseph Kennedy as saying that the teaching of the Church on annulments is Catholic gobbledegook and that no one actually believes the Church teaching on annulments.
I have seen the figures that in 1930, in the USA, the annulment rate was something like 10 in the whole USA, whereas now it is running at about 40,000 or 50,000 per year, and that of those who apply, the approval rate is roughly ninety percent. So it is ridiculous to blame Protestants for marriage breakups. Catholics can go through the marriage ceremony in a Catholic Church and then fifteen years later, after three or four children, they can decide that they were never really married because fifteen years ago, they really didn’t mean it when they said “I do.” Why was this issue never brought up before? Oh, it really has nothing to do with the fact that Mommy has found a new boyfriend at her local class in Catholic wicca theology.
Although the Church has the teaching of indissolubility of marriage officially on the books, it looks like the Church lawyers have figured out a way to get around this by introducing the idea of easy to obtain annulments. .