R
ralphinal
Guest
Why are they not there?Who says the Jews deliberately removed those parts?
If the same God told Muhammed the story that Noah prayed to, why is the story not the same?
Why are they not there?Who says the Jews deliberately removed those parts?
Saheeh International: No partner has He. And this I have been commanded, and I am the first [among you] of the Muslims."
whose words are in bracket?
I haven’t the foggiest what you are suggesting.
of course not, otherwise your sanity will be questionedI am not the one who is having difficulty understanding what I’m saying.
indeed. Seems Jews and Christians, specially Paul are all-knowing and omnipotent. Or rather, all of humanity conspired against Muhammad before his birth.I think that inJesus is saying that in order for the story of Noah to have been missing the parts about him saying he is Muslim, the Jews must have known that 1,000 years later, there would be Muhammed and Islam.
that’s not what i asked about. I asked why didn’t Jesus expose this famous corruption of scriptures, and your answer was that “not everything Jesus said is recorded”, yet you forgot that Jesus never ever said that the scriptures were corrupt, on the contrary. So how come Jesus didn’t expose it? or did He but Christians sided with Jews instead of Jesus? what is your answer/logic/argument?
i know, but you didn’t answer about the image and wisdom of Allah that you portray when you claim what you claim. A claim is easily made, but it has consequences and they are sometimes disastrous, and the image of the deity you are preaching is disastrous, a deity who is below faithfullness and sovereinty, who allows people to elevate his standards yet curse those who believe these high standards. We are not talking about a moody kid, or a wacko adolescent, nor a sadistic adult, we are talking about the faithful and sovereign God who thwarts the plans of the wicked.I accept and believe in the scripture which Allah has revealed and preserved.
Perhaps they were just lost in time, accidentally left out. There’s lots of things that could have happened without assuming malicious intent.Why are they not there?
If the same God told Muhammed the story that Noah prayed to, why is the story not the same?
The translator’s, obviously. To prevent people like yourself from drawing the wrong conclusion from that particular ayah.whose words are in bracket?
I think this is called a straw-man, isn’t it? I never said the Jews deleted anything.am asking why would Jews delete Noah’s call to Islam unless they were all-knowing and forsaw the coming of Muhammad? like, why didn’t the Jews delete all the Biblical verses Christians use regarding Jesus if they were so all-knowing? only when it comes to Muhammad they interfere?
I have the Qur’an, silly.we have the OT and NT, you have none. You aren’t submitting to God but to Muhammad because God says, before Muhammad, that His words stand forever and we have the OT because Jesus called it God’s words. You are insulting both God, and Jesus whom you consider a prophet, unless you believe Jesus exposed the corruption but Christians sided with Jews.
You realize they have the same OT, don’t you? Anyway, I never said anything about Jews corrupting anything, and don’t know why you’re going on about it in the first place.the Jews who corrupted, before Muhammad came into existence, obviously, because after he preached what he preached, if Jews corrupted, our OT will expose them.
Who is corrupt?of course not, otherwise your sanity will be questionedbut not everyone understands a sentence like : So many prophets of Islam, and stories of Islam, are in the Bible, simply because the Bible existed before Islam/Quran/Muhammad and there is no Islam without “and Muhammad is his messenger”. If by Islam you mean submitting to God, the Bible doesn’t need Muhammad as well since the ones who submit to God are the ones who believe in His words, not people who call them corrupt because of a single man.
I don’t see how this is related at all. How on earth can you possibly prove Jesus didn’t say something, or that he should’ve said something, or why? The mind boggles.that’s not what i asked about. I asked why didn’t Jesus expose this famous corruption of scriptures, and your answer was that “not everything Jesus said is recorded”, yet you forgot that Jesus never ever said that the scriptures were corrupt, on the contrary. So how come Jesus didn’t expose it? or did He but Christians sided with Jews instead of Jesus? what is your answer/logic/argument?
I look at scripture with different assumptions and biases than you. If you want to assume what you believe is true while trying to examine my position, and then get stuck, it’s not my problem. Really.i know, but you didn’t answer about the image and wisdom of Allah that you portray when you claim what you claim. A claim is easily made, but it has consequences and they are sometimes disastrous, and the image of the deity you are preaching is disastrous, a deity who is below faithfullness and sovereinty, who allows people to elevate his standards yet curse those who believe these high standards. We are not talking about a moody kid, or a wacko adolescent, nor a sadistic adult, we are talking about the faithful and sovereign God who thwarts the plans of the wicked.
All of them assume that God had no power or took no action to insure that things weren’t left out. Right?Perhaps they were just lost in time, accidentally left out. There’s lots of things that could have happened without assuming malicious intent.
All of what? And why?All of them assume that God had no power or took no action to insure that things weren’t left out. Right?
If you say that things were left out of the story of Noah, for example, and these things were important, you are implying that God either had no ability to keep it from happening or he chose to allow important information to vanish from the story.All of what? And why?
Huh?If you say that things were left out of the story of Noah, for example, and these things were important, you are implying that God either had no ability to keep it from happening or he chose to allow important information to vanish from the story.
I’m curious, I’ve read some statements in these forums that some Muslims think Christians believe in 3 gods since we believe in the Trinity. Is this what the majority of Muslims (not the extremists) teach their children (either at home or in school) about Christianity? And is this why there is so much animosity towards us - they think we are blaspheming their allah? If so, why aren’t the intelligent Muslims who actually understand Christianity and the Trinity correcting this gross misinformation? (I’ve seen the Trinity explained to other Muslim posters on these forums and some of them still don’t seem to get it - are they being deliberately obtuse, or is there something else that I’m not getting?)![]()
Thanks.
I don’t see how this is related at all. How on earth can you possibly prove Jesus didn’t
say something, or that he should’ve said something, or why? The mind boggles.
why is it mind boggling? Jesus did not teach/expose/say that the scriptures are corrupt, that’s it.
I look at scripture with different assumptions and biases than you. If you want to assume what you believe is true while trying to examine my position, and then get stuck, it’s not my problem. Really.
Not the same. You are saying that God would allow information needed for salvation to vanishHuh?
If someone dies, does that mean that God had no power to prevent that death? Of course not.
Is that really what I’m saying?Not the same. You are saying that God would allow information needed for salvation to vanish
If you claim that Noah was the first Muslm, and that Islam is taught in the Bible, and I can find neither thing there, yes, it is what you are saying.Is that really what I’m saying?