What do think about Gloria Polo's testimony

  • Thread starter Thread starter rcwitness
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Eucharist flying out from the tabernacle 3x to rest in her hands,evertime she put it back it flew back out again. ???
Claims the angels are jealous of humans because we can suffer & recieve the eucharist ??? Claims Christ will bless the whole world on account of herself ???
Suffered from tuberculosis which in turn can effect the brain
The angels do look with awe on what the Lord has done for humans. The angels did not fall from grace and had no need to be redeemed.

We live in such a materialistic world, (that is passing away) that it is difficult to understand the spiritual miracles that happen to holy people.

Yes, our Lord Jesus Christ will bless the whole world through the revelation of Divine Mercy that He chose to be revealed in St. Faustina.

Any kind of suffering can affect the brain, it doesn’t mean that what the Lord is doing in the person is not valid. The Church takes a long time to investigate such things.
 
The angels do look with awe on what the Lord has done for humans. The angels did not fall from grace and had no need to be redeemed.

We live in such a materialistic world, (that is passing away) that it is difficult to understand the spiritual miracles that happen to holy people.

Yes, our Lord Jesus Christ will bless the whole world through the revelation of Divine Mercy that He chose to be revealed in St. Faustina.

Any kind of suffering can affect the brain, it doesn’t mean that what the Lord is doing in the person is not valid. The Church takes a long time to investigate such things.
👍👍👍
 
The angels do look with awe on what the Lord has done for humans. The angels did not fall from grace and had no need to be redeemed.

We live in such a materialistic world, (that is passing away) that it is difficult to understand the spiritual miracles that happen to holy people.

Yes, our Lord Jesus Christ will bless the whole world through the revelation of Divine Mercy that He chose to be revealed in St. Faustina.

Any kind of suffering can affect the brain, it doesn’t mean that what the Lord is doing in the person is not valid. The Church takes a long time to investigate such things.
Divine Mercy is found in the gospel, not in the 1930s by a person who claims where there is no proof or backing whatsoever that they were real. Angels being jealous of humans because we can suffer,what nonsense.Sounds like Faustina was part of the cult of suffering & death that plaqued christianity for too long
 
You truly are sensible. However since scripture is often allegorical,we dont jnow if hell even exists
You can believe what you want about private revelations, but this statement goes against Church Teaching. Please refrain from it in this thread.
 
Divine Mercy is found in the gospel, not in the 1930s by a person who claims where there is no proof or backing whatsoever that they were real. Angels being jealous of humans because we can suffer,what nonsense.Sounds like Faustina was part of the cult of suffering & death that plaqued christianity for too long
Of course Divine Mercy is found in the gospel, because it is about Jesus and He is the Word!

The world needs to have a spotlight put on Divine Mercy!

The angels being “jealous” because we can suffer is a manner of speaking.

When we cannot change suffering, in whatever form it comes in, it can be redemptive when we accept it with love and resignation.

Peace,

Dorothy

1
 
Divine Mercy is found in the gospel, not in the 1930s by a person who claims where there is no proof or backing whatsoever that they were real. Angels being jealous of humans because we can suffer,what nonsense.Sounds like Faustina was part of the cult of suffering & death that plaqued christianity for too long
Very sad post by you! St Faustina has brought so many people to God! How can you say what you do?
 
In the 1970s a document in the Vatican surfaced that stated with all the advances in psychiatry/psychology approval of so-called private revellations of some kind may of been premature.Approval many decades or centuries after the person died is highly suspect. Margaret mary had her private revellations of the sacred heart approved but she licked vomit & feces once as a penance thinking this was pleasing to God. sainthood is fallible & it does not validate a private revellation
 
In the 1970s a document in the Vatican surfaced that stated with all the advances in psychiatry/psychology approval of so-called private revellations of some kind may of been premature.Approval many decades or centuries after the person died is highly suspect. Margaret mary had her private revellations of the sacred heart approved but she licked vomit & feces once as a penance thinking this was pleasing to God. sainthood is fallible & it does not validate a private revellation
Where is your evidence to backup what you are saying?
 
Thank you (name removed by moderator)-your posts have given great comfort to me after reading the other disturbing ones.
 
In the 1970s a document in the Vatican surfaced that stated with all the advances in psychiatry/psychology approval of so-called private revellations of some kind may of been premature.Approval many decades or centuries after the person died is highly suspect. Margaret mary had her private revellations of the sacred heart approved but she licked vomit & feces once as a penance thinking this was pleasing to God. sainthood is fallible & it does not validate a private revellation
I know not of the document you speak of and its context.

Saints in their excess of zeal and their desire to abase themselves were imprudent at times. It is hard for me to understand that fault of excess, as I am not spiritually at the place where St. Margaret Mary was. Obviously she did not ask her spiritual director if she should follow certain inclinations to mortify herself; I am certain he would have said no.

Devotion to the Sacred Heart of Our Lord Jesus Christ has helped countless souls in their spiritual life.

Peace,

Dorothy
 
You truly are sensible.
I admitted to having a tendency towards scepticism when hearing some accounts of what the thread refers to, but I wouldn’t consider myself to be more “sensible” then any one who doesn’t share my doubts.

As it happens I have my own devotions and form of prayers inspired from the writings of saints, one of them is a devotion to the rosary, another to the Sacred Heart.
After all, the church may gently encourage the practice of some approved devotions, but it doesn’t force or compel us.
 
40.png
kalbertone:
See my response in your latest discussion
 
Kalbertone,

Would you welcome Gloria Polo to your parish?

I find most of what she said fascinating. Some things are hard to understand, but that would seem reasonable considering the claim. I think she would at least deserve an explanation of things which we have trouble understanding.

Remember, no one is asking if she is a Saint. She had an experience which obviously compelled her to deep conversion and testimony. I would love to hear her testimony and faith.
 
Where is your evidence ? Even the catechism calls private revellations “SO-CALLED”,meaning they might not be true
Plenty of Evidence regarding St Faustina. Where is your evidence about what you said about her health?
 
You can believe what you want about private revelations, but this statement goes against Church Teaching. Please refrain from it in this thread.
No it does not its called Historical criticism. pius XII approved it in 1944 & The Second Vatican Council approved it. Modern Scholarship of the bible have come a long way
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top