Brendan_64:
The trouble with getting too het up about types of instruments is that ultimately they are not what really matters. This isn’t an issue of morality and while we each may have our personal preferences what mattets is that the music is fitting and reverent.
I’d go even further and argue that “fitting” and “reverent” are subjective where music is concerned.
My feelings on this have always been “conservative” and high-church. So I’ve preferred traditional music, organs, a-cappella, etc, to the point of wanting the Church to just return to all the old practices.
Even then, I didn’t know that female voices in the choir was a “novelty,” as the first “traditional” choir I heard in Mass was 50% female, and it was a fine choir singing the best of liturgical music.
But my views have changed.
A few years ago I made facebook friends with a Nigerian priest. He runs a seminary and other Church activities in Nigeria. One Christmas he shared a video of his seminarians singing a Christmas “song”. It had congo drums, a swirling organ sound, and a catchy beat. After some time I realised they were singing “Thine be the Glory” in their own language. The melody was the original, but they had played it the way they would if they’d been given any melody and set out to accompany it with their own instruments and musical skills (which were quite high)
It was beautiful, reverent and from the heart. I’d never try to impose western music on them,
Since then, I’ve been in favour of cultural adaptation of liturgical music.
Especially as we are going to need these young men, and others from the third world, to minister to our dwindling parishes.
ps. I just wish I could share that inspiring video of the Nigerian seminarians singing
Thine be the Glory!, but unfortunately it was in a private fb group. He does this for the safety of his seminarians.
