B
Byzantine_Wolf
Guest
That’s a very valid question - unfortunately you’ll have to ask Hank Hanegraaff, or read more on what he has to say about that. I don’t want to speak for him with the limited knowledge I have on that regard. I only know that he’s openly said that he considers some Catholics to be Christians and that he simply disagrees with many teachings of the Catholic Church (in the same way I disagree with many teachings of the Charismatic churches, yet still consider Charismatic Christians, or at least the very majority of them, to be brothers and sisters in Christ).Which Catholics do non-Catholics see as brothers and sisters in Christ? The ones that try to practice all the teachings of the Catholic Church or the ones that only practice the teachings that are in agreement with Protestant teachings and reject the rest? What must a Catholic believe for a non-Catholic Christian to acknowledge that the Catholic is a Christian?
I wasn’t claiming you were lying, and my apologies if it seemed that way. It’s just possible to misunderstand people in a brief broadcast or hearing them say one thing when they’ve expounded upon that position in another. I’ve been guilty of that myself - and sometimes I’ve thought well of people before realizing later on they taught heresies or believed unorthodox things.Then, he has changed his position. It would be *impossible *for me to point you to the radio broadcast in which he made these claims - *15 years ago *- while I was driving home from work. *If *Hank has shifted his position - it was by the work of the Holy Spirit. I stopped listening to him years ago.
If you think I’m lying - so be it. I have absolutely no reason to falsely add Hank to the scores of other anti-Catholic broadcasters out there.
It’s possible that Hanegraaff changed his position, or perhaps created a more educated opinion of it. After all, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was a racist until he met Frederick Douglass, so people can change