J
JanR
Guest
Was it to condition the earth to eventually support mammals and other later creatures?
Yeah, It probably has something to do with Chik-fil-ATo evolve them into birds.
The last time Jesus came back he asked for fish. The next time he just might ask for a chicken sandwich, and if he does, I would try to get him one from Chik-fil-A.It is the Lord’s Chicken.
This interpretation works well with concepts like an old universe, the big bang, and evolution–ie God created all things at once in potency (the big bang) and then formed them over time (old universe, evolution). St. Augustine elsewhere compares this formation of things to how mountains and rivers are shaped over time. Even with man, Genesis doesn’t say how long it took God to form man from the slime of the earth after the seventh day.There can be no doubt, then, that the work whereby man was formed from the slime of the earth and a wife fashioned for him from his side belongs not to that creation by which all thing were made together, after completing which, God rested, but to that work of God which takes place with the unfolding of the ages as He works even now.
But isn’t that the really beautiful part of it? Rather than going down a list and saying “Okay, now it’s time for Chimpanzees to branch off” He (it seems to me) did the equivalent of striking one cue ball and clearing every pool table that ever was or will be built of balls in a single shot. And then some, as they say.It’s never been clear to me that once God set creation - and evolution as well - into motion, He explicitly willed each distinct species and sub-species into being.
I can only fall back on “His ways are not our ways” and hope to understand eventually.someone would tell me what He was thinking when it came to carpenter ants and ticks
St. Augustine explains an acceptable interpretation of Creation in Book 6 of his “Literal Meaning of Genesis,": which I think is helpful here.
He explains that the six days represent not literal days, but a scheme or plan of creation. The actual creation during those “days” was instantaneous and of things in potency and causation, but not necessarily their final visible form which would be shaped later over time. For example, he places the actual formation of man’s body after the seventh day (which explains why there is two creation accounts of man in Genesis):
St. Augustine
That is a very reasonable explanation. And it should put an end, once and for all, to the conflict between creationists and evolutionists. BOTH happened.There can be no doubt, then, that the work whereby man was formed from the slime of the earth and a wife fashioned for him from his side belongs not to that creation by which all thing were made together, after completing which, God rested, but to that work of God which takes place with the unfolding of the ages as He works even now.
I tend to believe along your lines – that God put into place the mechanisms and processes through which and by which creation could evolve, then he lets it unfold accordingly with minimal intervention. This, too, was and is part of his plan.It’s never been clear to me that once God set creation - and evolution as well - into motion, He explicitly willed each distinct species and sub-species into being. My belief is that His plan was in many respects to let creation take its course. On the other hand, if He did will each distinct species into being, I wish someone would tell me what He was thinking when it came to carpenter ants and ticks - just to name two questionable corners of creation.
Maybe… The world was warmer and very lush - and large herbifores were needed to trim the foliage…Was it to condition the earth to eventually support mammals and other later creatures?
And another interesting question is why the giant meteor or meteor shower suddenly occurred that caused their extinction. Was that just a natural phenomenon, or did God decide the dinosaurs had outlived their usefulness, and his purposes for their existing, so decided to put an abrupt end to them?JanR:
Maybe… The world was warmer and very lush - and large herbifores were needed to trim the foliage…Was it to condition the earth to eventually support mammals and other later creatures?
Sure… There’s potentially zillions of ‘interesting WHY? questions’ which could be raised…And another interesting question is why the giant meteor or meteor shower suddenly occurred that caused their extinction. Was that just a natural phenomenon, or did God decide the dinosaurs had outlived their usefulness, and his purposes for their existing, so decided to put an abrupt end to them?
Some of the dinosaurs were carnivores, and ate the smaller, less defensive herbivores.JanR:
Maybe… The world was warmer and very lush - and large herbifores were needed to trim the foliage…Was it to condition the earth to eventually support mammals and other later creatures?