A
AlbMagno
Guest
I think this is the rethoric that makes it confusing.
Theologians often like to exalt the uniqueness of the human being, because he goes contranatura with his morality and helps the “weak” by serving them. That certainly comes from God.
However, that puts us in a very terrible theological problem: why the rest of nature is different, if it was created by God? Why a poor, handicapped animal has to suffer a horrible death, if he doesn’t even have an everlasting soul according to tradition? It’s that what you call “unfold”?
You may say, because of Original Sin, but if we accept evolution we accept that Original sin came after natural selection… so… is it retroactive? Does it work from Eternity? Then why Christ’ Resurrection (or His Second Coming) didn’t put nature in order retroactively?
The only way I can see natural selection working with Divine Justice is if there is an animal’s Heaven, and animals also participate in some form into redemptive suffering.
Theologians often like to exalt the uniqueness of the human being, because he goes contranatura with his morality and helps the “weak” by serving them. That certainly comes from God.
However, that puts us in a very terrible theological problem: why the rest of nature is different, if it was created by God? Why a poor, handicapped animal has to suffer a horrible death, if he doesn’t even have an everlasting soul according to tradition? It’s that what you call “unfold”?
You may say, because of Original Sin, but if we accept evolution we accept that Original sin came after natural selection… so… is it retroactive? Does it work from Eternity? Then why Christ’ Resurrection (or His Second Coming) didn’t put nature in order retroactively?
The only way I can see natural selection working with Divine Justice is if there is an animal’s Heaven, and animals also participate in some form into redemptive suffering.