J
Jason_1977
Guest
Well, I dont think guitars should take communion unless they’ve been to confession. LMAO!!!
To tie it in with why guitars may be such a source of contention for use at mass is that although there are people who do play this instrument with reverence and prayer (and I’m sure they do at the masses you have described and experienced), many times there are those who don’t do that. I’ve experienced too many “guitar masses” which were that way and had such a lack of “prayerfulness”. It focused too much on the “sensual”, the “secular”, the “emotion”. Although, most of the guitarists I’ve experienced at mass were just not good guitarists or musicians in general.
QUOTE]
Being a guitarist, I take great exception to comments like this. The view that a "guitar mass is less prayfull is a preception that you seem to have since you have other preferances. That may be your right, but there is not a right to denagrate those who give of thier time and talents in a minesrty of the Church.
Peace,
FAB
You misunderstood me as well and I’m sorry for that. I don’t think blue collar is bad at all either. I also explained that I know you didn’t mean it that way, and in that post I explained when I first read it, I immediately thought that was what you meant and was taken aback because to me “blue collar” is a term to describe a class of people. It is easy to take what you said as saying mediocrity is equal to being blue collar, which I know that you know it isn’t and thus is why I thought I made that clear later on in my post. Apparently, I didn’t and I apologize for that.You totally misunderstand my post. That’s what I cannot stand about the internet and posting. I am very proud of my father’s blue collar status. I’m afraid you “added” something as if blue collar is bad or something. It isn’t. Period.
I see a lot of that on here. People reading into things. Too bad. There is no Utopia her on earth. The holy Spirit performs the “same” action at any mass. That’s all that counts.
The Eucharist. I don’t really care how anybody sings or plays the guitar or the accordian.
I’m blue collar too no matter what my work is. No matter what degrees I hold.
So, forget about it.
Sarabande;5730293:
No, I do not think that a guitar mass is less prayerful. I never said it was “less prayerful”. I said,To tie it in with why guitars may be such a source of contention for use at mass is that although there are people who do play this instrument with reverence and prayer (and I’m sure they do at the masses you have described and experienced), many times there are those who don’t do that. I’ve experienced too many “guitar masses” which were that way and had such a lack of “prayerfulness”. It focused too much on the “sensual”, the “secular”, the “emotion”. Although, most of the guitarists I’ve experienced at mass were just not good guitarists or musicians in general.
QUOTE]
Being a guitarist, I take great exception to comments like this. The view that a "guitar mass is less prayfull is a preception that you seem to have since you have other preferances. That may be your right, but there is not a right to denagrate those who give of thier time and talents in a minesrty of the Church.
Peace,
FAB
I don’t say the instrument itself is “less prayerful” either.that although there are people who do play this instrument with reverence and prayer (and I’m sure they do at the masses you have described and experienced), many times there are those who don’t do that.
If the musicians involved do play prayerfully, then yes, it can be prayerful and reverent. I’ve worked with good guitarists who could play prayerfully and well. I’ve experienced a couple of masses where the only instrument they had available was a guitar and they did the best they could with it with prayerful intent and was fine with it. I’m fairly certain that musicians like Guitar and pnewton play their guitar beautifully and prayerfully and I have a lot of respect for those two. I also mentioned in my response to JReducation (the same post which you quoted from) that the masses he experienced were most likely prayerful from what he described.
But, unfortunately, much of what I have experienced with guitar masses have not been that way. I’m sorry about that. When I have experienced a prayerful/reverent guitar mass it was the exception. The same can be said with almost any instrument. I’ve experienced flamboyant, over-the-top classical singing, organ playing, piano playing, etc., so I don’t necessarily have a vendetta against any particular instrument. But one cannot deny the fact that there is a contention regarding the guitar for mass, and I believe it is because many times people do experience it in a way that isn’t prayerful. If that wasn’t the case, then there wouldn’t be such a long thread on it.
I once ended a thesis tracing the history of the long period of non-use and eventual use of the organ in Christian worship with almost these exact words - the version I found replaced “grace” with “mercy”.Comic relief time.
In the music of the pipe organ we know the majesty of God. In it’s ending, we know His grace.
Are you telling me that you’re giving up playing the accousitc guitar because some people don’t like it? That does not work that way. The rubrics are clear on this. You can paly the guitar at mass. It is certain types of songs that are more for entertainment that should not be played, not the instrument.I have just finished looking over 38 pages of threads in an effort to help me make a big (for me) decision. I have been playing a guitar in liturgical settings for about 25 years. I come to Mass to celebrate Christ’s resurrection, a celebration of God’s mercy and the benefit of the Resurrection. In my parish it is the practice for the same songs to be played at every Mass each week. Some songs are better played on the acoustic instruments; others are better accompanied on the organ (which wasn’t around when Christ walked on the earth). (I saw no reference to joyful noise, cymbals and lyres, that were in use at Jesus’ synagogue. Did Christ “diss” that traditions?)
The joy of celebrating and encouraging the congregation to sing (the mission of the music leader) is no longer there for me. My “retiring” from active music ministry will result in more of the music I don’t care for, but that’s ok. At least I know I won’t be offending those who dislike the acoustic guitar any longer.
Look at it this way, maybe now you can spend more time focusing on Christ’s sacrifice instead of which folk song to strum next.I have just finished looking over 38 pages of threads in an effort to help me make a big (for me) decision. I have been playing a guitar in liturgical settings for about 25 years. I come to Mass to celebrate Christ’s resurrection, a celebration of God’s mercy and the benefit of the Resurrection. In my parish it is the practice for the same songs to be played at every Mass each week. Some songs are better played on the acoustic instruments; others are better accompanied on the organ (which wasn’t around when Christ walked on the earth). (I saw no reference to joyful noise, cymbals and lyres, that were in use at Jesus’ synagogue. Did Christ “diss” that traditions?)
The joy of celebrating and encouraging the congregation to sing (the mission of the music leader) is no longer there for me. My “retiring” from active music ministry will result in more of the music I don’t care for, but that’s ok. At least I know I won’t be offending those who dislike the acoustic guitar any longer.
Don’t misunderstand me. I did say that those who have the gift of music should be encouraged to created beautiful music for worship. What I am opposed to is dismissing them from the liturgy, because they do not play the organ. That’s not what the documents are asking for. They are asking to keep the secular entertainment out and the sacred in.So, what is wrong with asking for and desiring genuine sacred music? What is wrong with wanting the music used for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass to be of the highest quality and with wanting the proper instruments to be used for same?
A lot of the music for the One World Praying Mass was not at all suitable for the Mass. It was mostly Protestant Praise and Worship music. I am surprised that the Blue Army opted for this kind of music. Inasmuch as the musician in question sang the Magnificat and the Hail Mary, everything else was not suitable. It certainly was not up to the usual EWTN standards. I find it highly unlikely that EWTN would have wanted that kind of music used for the Mass. Whoever is supposed to handle the music should be better versed in what the Church standards are. The bongo drums and the drum kit should not have been used.
What folks do not seem to understand is that the musicians need to study the Church documents and not necessarily go by how or what they feel, but, what the Church provides by way of Musicam Sacram and even the Chirograph on Sacred Music. What they played was better suited for a prayer meeting or some other event outside of the Mass, but, not during the Mass. It’s not a matter of putting the musicians down; rather, it is a matter of telling them that they need to have some sort of accountability and that they need to study the Church documents. I do not think that this is too much to ask.
No one has forgotten or denied that the organ holds the place of pride in liturgy. I think it is wonderful that one can have organ music at a wedding. This assumes one can find an organist and has the money to pay for one. Not all Church’s have organists as member or can afford the funds to pay for them at the multiple weekly Masses.Even after these 38 pages I am still unconvinced of the sacral nature of the guitar for use in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. What the proponents of guitar music seem to forget is that the organ holds pride of place in the Church’s liturgical life. …I am in the process of planning my cousin’s wedding. To my joyful surprise, she wanted an organist and a cantor.
Nothing is wrong with this and this must always be our goal. However, as with all human endeavors, the hightest must be, the highest we can offer and is available. The practical reality is that the best we can do is often the best we can do. I have you all hold me accountable that if I ever move to a parish that has an organist and a pipe organ, I will find another way to contribute to the parish and with joy drop out music, at least during Mass.So, what is wrong with asking for and desiring genuine sacred music? What is wrong with wanting the music used for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass to be of the highest quality and with wanting the proper instruments to be used for same?
You realize I am sure that an organist must also focus somewhat on the music they are playing and the order of Mass.Look at it this way, maybe now you can spend more time focusing on Christ’s sacrifice instead of which folk song to strum next.
Even after these 38 pages I am still unconvinced of the sacral nature of the guitar for use in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. What the proponents of guitar music seem to forget is that the organ holds pride of place in the Church’s liturgical life. Guitars, for me, are more along the lines of secular pop/folk music. A lot of the songs pushed by OCP and GIA are more along the lines of bad pop music than genuine sacred music, especially the tripe from Spirit and Song.
We need to recapture the sense of beauty, the sense of the sacred and the sense of majesty in the Mass. The guitar just does not cut it. I have heard enough bad guitar music in my brief time on this planet to know that it is just not fitting.
I realize that this sounds harsh, but, the strumming and the picking are more in line with Woodstock than with the Mass.
While I was getting read for Mass, I heard some of the broadcast of the One World Praying event that EWTN was airing. The music for that particular Mass was horrendous. It had bongo drums, a drum kit and it was just plain awful. The songs for Communion were more along the lines of Protestant Praise and Worship than anything truly sacred. Regardless of who was playing and singing, it was just not fitting.
Can anyone explain exactly why the organ was chosen to have “pride of place”?
From what I have read the precurser to today’s organ was played at the Roman circus when Christians were martyred, as well as when they had their “games”.
The only reason I can think of is because it is loud and could be heard throughout the large churches. And it is “traditional”.
And as we all know, the organ has been used in many secular settings. Silent movies, etc. and the “Giant Wurlitzer” that was the main draw of a local pizza restaurant.
Peraonally, a well played violin lifts my heart and mind to God immediately. The booming organ reminds me of the pizza place or a riverboat. So why did the Church choose the organ for “pride of place”?
benedictgal;5837913:
Or the ballgame or a horror movie, or for me specifically, the skating rink.Even after these 38 pages I am still unconvinced of the sacral nature of the guitar for use in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. What the proponents of guitar music seem to forget is that the organ holds pride of place in the Church’s liturgical life. Guitars, for me, are more along the lines of secular pop/folk music. A lot of the songs pushed by OCP and GIA are more along the lines of bad pop music than genuine sacred music, especially the tripe from Spirit and Song.
We need to recapture the sense of beauty, the sense of the sacred and the sense of majesty in the Mass. The guitar just does not cut it. I have heard enough bad guitar music in my brief time on this planet to know that it is just not fitting.
I realize that this sounds harsh, but, the strumming and the picking are more in line with Woodstock than with the Mass.
While I was getting read for Mass, I heard some of the broadcast of the One World Praying event that EWTN was airing. The music for that particular Mass was horrendous. It had bongo drums, a drum kit and it was just plain awful. The songs for Communion were more along the lines of Protestant Praise and Worship than anything truly sacred. Regardless of who was playing and singing, it was just not fitting.
Can anyone explain exactly why the organ was chosen to have “pride of place”?
From what I have read the precurser to today’s organ was played at the Roman circus when Christians were martyred, as well as when they had their “games”.
The only reason I can think of is because it is loud and could be heard throughout the large churches. And it is “traditional”.
And as we all know, the organ has been used in many secular settings. Silent movies, etc. and the “Giant Wurlitzer” that was the main draw of a local pizza restaurant.
Peraonally, a well played violin lifts my heart and mind to God immediately. The booming organ reminds me of the pizza place or a riverboat. So why did the Church choose the organ for “pride of place”?
Real sacred. I can just feel the reverence.
It’s all personal opinion. And fortunately, the Catholic Church does not base its teachings on the whims of personal opinion. “An adult faith does not follow the waves of fashion and the latest novelty.” (Or also the most ancient novelty.)
Those of you who inspired captainbernie to quit playing guitar in his local Mass have an awful lot to answer for. Silencing someone who is using a gift from the Lord is serious business.
I agree, the statement about concentrating on the Sacrifice instead of strumming folk hymns is absolutely insulting, and calls into question everything this poster has ever said. As a pianist in Mass, I worship on two planes, and one of those planes is the practical–which hymnal do I need to have open and ready, following the cantor during the Psalm, waiting for Father to finish the Consecration, etc.
I understand how captainbernie feels because I felt the same way during this thread. I just decided that the best thing to do was follow the written teachings of the Catholic Church and obey the bishop and priest whom I know and love, rather than cave in to people on a computer forum who I don’t know from Adam, and who might not even be who or what they say they are.
“Beauty is in the eye of the beholder”. So true. I think those who do things “for show”, have a lot to learn.when ever I read these threads, it’s always we need the organ to recapture the beauty anf magesty of the mass. Beside the fact that organs or very espensive, and a good organist is as hard to find as hens teeth, that wououold miss the point.
In the past two weeks I had the honor the serve and assisit my bishop in two celebrations of the Eucharist. the first was in our cathedral, there was the choir and music, the incense and all the grandure, certanly a beautiful and magestic mass. The second one was under the cover of an outdoor basket ball court, on a temporay stage with a folding table as the altar. The music was with a guitar and a keyboard and seven off key singers. This place would not have fit the definition the many want to place waht the celebration of the eucharist should be, but yet it had all the beauty and magesty of the catherdral mass. It was held for young men confined in a juvenille facilty. They have all broken the law and are spending thier time in locked up as they should, but this celebration of the euacharist, brought Jesus into thier lives, brought hope, brought comfort.
It’s not the music or appointments that give the mass it’s beauty and magesty, it is the presence of our savior, the participation in the sacrafice and being part of the body of Christ.
Peace,
FAB