What do you think about Harry Potter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pauljmaxmi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
[2QUOTE=Tom of Assisi]Well, speaking artistically, the books are pretty silly and, I would say, poorly written. The first book reads like some welfare mother wrote it on a napkin in a restaurant while waiting for her case worker to show up and give her some more money…oh wait…that’s exactly what it is.

It’s one thing for children aged 7–10 to read Harry Potter. I roll over laughing when adults read it. Instead of Tolstoy, Melville, Joyce, Proust, Nabokov, Shakespeare, etc, etc, etc… they read a children’s novel and think it’s literature…

:rotfl:

I was reading Kafka’s Transformation the other day at the park, and some woman came up to me and said, “oh you’re a reader. I read too. I am reading th 5th Harry Potter book now. Hee hee.” I just smiled at her and nodded .

I’m sorry you have such an elitist view of literature, and such a narrow defintion. You are missing out on some of the greatest joy of reading. Honestly, had I grown up with the above works instead of “Book Trails- Through the Wildwood, The Highroad to Adventure, and Through Enchanted Lands”, none of which are published anymore, but all of which contain old fairy tails from all time periods, I would not be an aspiring writer. I would have died of boredom as a 5 year old, and my brother would never had learned to read at all. (He really struggled).

Now, due to those types of works at which you point and mock, both my brother and I have published written work. We are both avid readers. Although I don’t disagree that children of all ages should be exposed to the authors you promote, there are other positive influences in the development of the reader, whether juvenile or adult.

I have never read the HP books, but have nonetheless been entertained by the movies. I enjoyed the special effects and have marveled at the imagination of the author. Since I haven’t read the books, however, I’m not sure how many of the effects are the authoresses’ versus Hollywood’s.

Just the same, although the characters aren’t pristine, they are good examples of children (albiet under unusual circumstances) who react realistically, who show nobility instead of cowardice in facing up to an accepting responsibility…and who still manage to bumble things and make wrong decisions that eventually turn out right. Consider the first movie, in which Ron and Harry run to the bathroom to alert Hemoine to the presence of the Troll…it was Ron’s fault she was there to begin with. They end up having to save her from the Troll, and rather than run away for fear of getting into trouble, they step up to help their friend. They risk their lives.

When being chastized, yes, Hermoine lied about what happened, and although I feel the truth would have been a better story, she did it to keep the friends she knew were innocent out of trouble. I don’t support lying, but it sure makes a good discussion topic with children using this scene for “what could the kids have done better?”

The HP books and movies can be a very positive parenting tool, in my opinion. I grew up on fantasy…witches, sprites, spirits, ghosts, demons, kings, trolls, and Wondering Tom’s.

HP is just another version of the fantasy I encountered as a child.

I hope you begin to understand that the classics will always remain so and will always have their place…but new classics will appear, and the fads will add their 2 cents and then die away. Only time will tell, really. Entertainment is still entertainment and can be used to teach moral lessons without boring people to dust in the process.

I’m sure, Tom of Assisi, you’ll roll over laughing when I tell you that I tried to read Kafka and fell asleep. I’ve read Shakespear, and was enchanted and wished I’d had a chance to study his work prior to High School. But I never would have read the philosophers on my own without college, and had Mom attempted…I would have run away. Maybe I’m not a genious, as God did not create me that way…and maybe you do have the IQ that craves complicated works for yoru version of relaxation.

But when I (and others, I daresay) come home from work, we like to relax with an “easy” book, fun imagery, all of which take us away from the reality of the harsh and condemning lives we live every day.
 
Love it. I don’t see any difference between this and star wars or LOTR or anything. All are fantasies. Keyword being “fantasies.” Just as long as kids are told it’s not real, then it’s fine.
 
marthax2 said:
“I began to notice a pattern. Of the commentators I read who loved the Harry Potter books, virtually none of them had ever experienced the occult. To them this was a delightful fantasy in the same genre as J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis. In contrast, almost every commentator I read who had experience with the occult found the books disturbing, almost as if they were primers on witchcraft.” …

“Rituals and spells and brews are used by witches in the real world, and they work because of the power of evil spirits. As such they can never lead to good. Portraying these innately evil practices as if they can be harnessed for good is a dangerous lie.” …

Umm I find nothing wrong with Harry and I have had a rather intersting running in with the occult…there was a practicing wiccan in my Confirmation class. He was more against Harry Potter than I had ever heard he said it was deplorable travesty, no nearer to bringing one to wicca then something (comparabale to the di vinci code now I think) was to bringing someone to christianity.

Let it be, its a cute work of Children’s fiction…
 
40.png
ByzCath:
All I can assume is that the quotes above all come from Toni Collins, who ever that is.

What I joke. I was a practicing wicca and into the occult and magic and a neo-pagan as well.

Nothing in the Harry Potter stories resembles “witchcraft” or the occult or magic at all.

For this person to say that the Harry Potter stories are “primers” on “witchcraft” is so funny I almost fell out of my chair laughing when I read that…
I was going to comment on that post, but you stated it perfectly. 👍
 
40.png
Melissa:
That’s not to say that I’d give a green light to any child reading HP. Those who have difficulty discerning the difference between fantasy and reality should not read HP, regardless of age. Parents should make the judgment based on their knowledge of their own children and be aware of what their children are reading (whether HP, or anything else found on the shelves of the local bookstore).
Exactly. It’s not a problem of whether it is “occult” or not. It’s a problem of whether the person reading it can understand that it is fantasy, not reality.
 
40.png
marthax2:
explained that J.K. Rowling’s books contain innumerable positive references to magic, ‘the satanic art’.
The problem here is that not everyone who practices magic is a Satanist.
He noted that the books attempt to make a false distinction between black and white magic, when in fact, the distinction ‘does not exist, because magic is always a turn to the devil.’
Right and wrong. Right: There is not “white” or “black” or good and bad magic. Magic is neutral. It is the intent behind the magic that makes it good or bad. Wrong: While I’m sure there may be some people that worship the Christian Devil and may turn to him for “aid” in their magic, the majority of magic practices is a): manipulation of the natural (God-created) energies around us b): essentially a prayer to a higher-being of infinite good.
 
Interesting rebuttals here…I find them interesting …the different perspectives about this whole subject…keep them coming as long as you dont openly insult anyone or say rude things to them…
 
40.png
BlessedBe13:
The problem here is that not everyone who practices magic is a Satanist.
Acutally not everyone who practices magic intends to worship Satan.

Wicca, while outside of the Christian world view, still worships powers and beings that are not God.
Right and wrong. Right: There is not “white” or “black” or good and bad magic. Magic is neutral. It is the intent behind the magic that makes it good or bad. Wrong: While I’m sure there may be some people that worship the Christian Devil and may turn to him for “aid” in their magic, the majority of magic practices is a): manipulation of the natural (God-created) energies around us b): essentially a prayer to a higher-being of infinite good.
Magic is not neutral.

Here is what the Catechism has to say.

2117 All practices of magic or sorcery, by which one attempts to tame occult powers, so as to place them at one’s service and have a supernatural power over others - even if this were for the sake of restoring their health - are gravely contrary to the virtue of religion. These practices are even more to be condemned when accompanied by the intention of harming someone, or when they have recourse to the intervention of demons. Wearing charms is also reprehensible. Spiritism often implies divination or magical practices; the Church for her part warns the faithful against it. Recourse to so-called traditional cures does not justify either the invocation of evil powers or the exploitation of another’s credulity.

2138 Superstition is a departure from the worship that we give to the true God. It is manifested in idolatry, as well as in various forms of divination and magic.
 
These books are not trying to make people perform witch craft and stuff like that. The magical characteristic is more for the imagination stimulation.
The only troubling factor about these books is that Harry breaks rules in order to do good. As a result, people or young kids reading these books may get the wrong impression about protective rules.
So just read these books with a guarded mind and/or supervision (depending on your age of course).
 
40.png
Meggie:
Umm I find nothing wrong with Harry and I have had a rather intersting running in with the occult…there was a practicing wiccan in my Confirmation class. He was more against Harry Potter than I had ever heard he said it was deplorable travesty, no nearer to bringing one to wicca then something (comparabale to the di vinci code now I think) was to bringing someone to christianity.

Let it be, its a cute work of Children’s fiction…
I must give more credence to Fr. Gabriel Amorth, the chief exorcist of Rome and president of the International Association of Exorcists, and Clare Merkle, who was an advanced healer and psychic in the new age movement. (Did you read her extraordinary! story at www.crossveil.org/page6.html?)

I hear what you are saying about one individual, and maybe there are many, who do not perceive any ill effects from their dabbling in the occult. That does not negate the witness of many who have come face to face with the devil and struggled and suffered tremendously to escape their involvement with new age.

At the beginning of her journey into the occult, Merkle describes this experience:

“On the night of my 28th birthday, after falling asleep, I had an out-of-body experience that I would never forget. I seemed to be lifted out of my body and saw who I thought was Jesus, together with my mother and grandmother. This dream figure of Jesus took me by the hand and brought me to a man who looked like an eastern guru. Jesus appeared to be giving me His blessing to leave the Catholic faith to practice eastern meditation and yoga. I awoke filled with happiness and peace.”

After attending a week-end new age workshop, she had a different experience:

“I then spent three weeks in continual, almost insufferable interior heat and mental anguish. Despite what equaled an emotional breakdown, the next year was spent working not one but three jobs as my marriage ended, and a three-year bitter divorce followed. During all this time, I was rarely free from the physical sensation of intense interior heat and emotional trauma. Only years later, reading a book about a saint who had seen and categorized the pains of hell, did I realize that I was experiencing, in some way, the very pains of hell itself including the feelings of total separation from God and despair. I resigned myself to living the effects of that weekend for the rest of my life. Although I had been delivered, it would take another five years to be healed and one year more to be converted once again.”
 
Two words (not counting the conjunction): Bor and ing!

– Mark L. Chance.
 
40.png
marthax2:
At the beginning of her journey into the occult, Merkle describes this experience:

ÒOn the night of my 28th birthday, after falling asleep, I had an out-of-body experience that I would never forget. I seemed to be lifted out of my body and saw who I thought was Jesus, together with my mother and grandmother. This dream figure of Jesus took me by the hand and brought me to a man who looked like an eastern guru. Jesus appeared to be giving me His blessing to leave the Catholic faith to practice eastern meditation and yoga. I awoke filled with happiness and peace.Ó

After attending a week-end new age workshop, she had a different experience:

ÒI then spent three weeks in continual, almost insufferable interior heat and mental anguish. Despite what equaled an emotional breakdown, the next year was spent working not one but three jobs as my marriage ended, and a three-year bitter divorce followed. During all this time, I was rarely free from the physical sensation of intense interior heat and emotional trauma. Only years later, reading a book about a saint who had seen and categorized the pains of hell, did I realize that I was experiencing, in some way, the very pains of hell itself including the feelings of total separation from God and despair. I resigned myself to living the effects of that weekend for the rest of my life. Although I had been delivered, it would take another five years to be healed and one year more to be converted once again.Ó
Can you tell me what either of these have to do with Harry Potter?

Let me tell you this, as I have stated elsewhere. The work of fiction that had the most to do with my entry into the occult/new age/wicca/neo-paganism was the Lord of the Rings.
 
Harry Potter??? hahahahha… not even in my orbit.
A silly childrens fantasy designed to further steal the souls of children…, Mind garbage, just plain rubbish. Why would anyone even bother? There is so much more to life out there then dumb movies and trivial novels.
 
40.png
ByzCath:
Can you tell me what either of these have to do with Harry Potter?

Let me tell you this, as I have stated elsewhere. The work of fiction that had the most to do with my entry into the occult/new age/wicca/neo-paganism was the Lord of the Rings.
Oops. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I should have explained that in a previous post (#12) I cited Fr. Gabriele Amorth and Clare Merkle, experts in the occult, who both said that Harry Potter is dangerous and can lead people into the occult.

My lenthy quote of Merkle was intended to illustrate that her opinion is worth listening to because she was deep into new age and that (although, as I have been hearing in this forum, some people can dabble in it without apparent ill effects) getting involved with new age can be very dangerous.

I have heard Catholics I trust on EWTN and authentic Catholic websites say that C.S. Lewis fantasies are good because they teach good values. However, I have always thought that some of his books could lead readers into the occult because they smack to me of white magic. You have confirmed my suspicion.
 
Oops - As I sit reading this forum my children are downstairs watching the latest Harry Potter movie 😃 I see no harm as long as children know the difference between what can happen and what can’t. My kids aren’t out performing acts they see on cartoons. I watch many forensic science shows but it doesn’t mean I’m going to go out and murder someone. I also read my husband’s running magazine - and I don’t go running 😃
 
40.png
ProudArmyWife:
Oops - As I sit reading this forum my children are downstairs watching the latest Harry Potter movie 😃 I see no harm as long as children know the difference between what can happen and what can’t. My kids aren’t out performing acts they see on cartoons. I watch many forensic science shows but it doesn’t mean I’m going to go out and murder someone. I also read my husband’s running magazine - and I don’t go running 😃
Many kids do not perform what they see on cartoons. Some do. When I was a child I tripped my sister, copying the 3 stooges; she hit her forehead on a brick step and had to have stitches.

I think some kids will be influenced by exposure to Harry Potter to look into new age, especially kids who are not so fortunate as yours to have parents who give them guidance.

ByzCatholic said in an earlier post that Lord of the Rings was
"the work of fiction that had the most to do with my entry into the occult/new age/wicca/ neo-paganism."
If *Lord of the Rings *can lead to the occult, how much more Harry Potter?

“[A]uthor J. K. Rowling admits that some Harry Potter readers have convinced themselves that Harry’s world is real. Rowling has said she gets letters all the time, desperate letters addressed to Hogwarts, begging to be allowed to attend Harry’s school.” (“The Perils of Harry Potter,” Jacqui Komschlies, www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2000/012/34.113.html)

“*n San Francisco, the Potter stories already have inspired countless children to seek other books about witches, wizards, and spooks. The city’s libraries have stocked their juvenile collections with this subject matter." (“Harry Potter: Agent of Conversion,” Toni Collins, www.catholicexchange.com/vm/index.asp?vm_id=2&art_id=15838) *
 
40.png
JMJ_Pinoy:
I am still discussing points that other people have brought up. I hope no one is offended by my continuing to argue new points. I think debating is a good thing if done courteously. I am already learning from the people here who have offered arguments to issues I have brought up.

Even though a department of the USCCB has given Harry Potter the thumbs up, I don’t know who writes the reviews for the USCCB Office for Film and Broadcasting. Decisions on ratings are not made by the body of bishops. Even if they were, I don’t place automatic trust in what the USCCB does. Here are 2 reasons why:

The ICEL translation of Scripture for the Roman Missal was rejected by the Vatican. Just one quote from “Liturgical rejects: Vatican dismisses translations and translators”:

"In a departure from the usually careful and diplomatic curial style, this rejection letter contained some of the strongest language I have ever read in a letter coming from the Holy See. (catholicinsight.com/online/church/liturgy/Insight_staff).

When the bishops first met to discuss the scandal in the Church, dissenters from the laity were invited to speak at the conference.

I trust the bishops only when the Vatican of the Holy Father gives them the thumbs up.
 
40.png
marthax2:
Here are 2 reasons why:

The ICEL translation of Scripture for the Roman Missal was rejected by the Vatican. Just one quote from “Liturgical rejects: Vatican dismisses translations and translators”:

"In a departure from the usually careful and diplomatic curial style, this rejection letter contained some of the strongest language I have ever read in a letter coming from the Holy See. (catholicinsight.com/online/church/liturgy/Insight_staff).

When the bishops first met to discuss the scandal in the Church, dissenters from the laity were invited to speak at the conference.

I trust the bishops only when the Vatican of the Holy Father gives them the thumbs up.
Neither of these reasons have anything to do with Harry Potter. All they do is smear the bishops they have nothing to to with the topic at hand.
 
But the Holy See doesn’t make definative determinations for us in regards to ‘entertainment’. We rely on our own judgement within the constraints of our Faith. We rely on advice from leaders in the Faith. And you must realize that the USCCB wouldn’t allow a representative of their organization to post something they didn’t agree with.

That said, I agree that the USCCB have given advice about a great number of things that I wasn’t so sure about. Which puts us back into the court of making determinations about our entertainment within the constraints of our Faith.

If your argument against HP is that it is bad literature and there is more enlightening literature out there…
I can’t argue with you there so far… There probably is more enlightening literature out there. I think Captain Underpants, and many other popular children’s literature is drivel. But sometimes that is the point of entertainment. Sometimes, the point isn’t to ‘be enlightened’ it is to experience another situation.

I understand that children are impressionable- but parental guidance here is the key. We as parents are in a position to point out these differences, and introduce the good literature too.

If your argument against HP is that it contains situations where the ‘hero’ of the story is doing things that aren’t so nice and reflective of the Faith, well I offer you two counter arguments.

There are a number of well written stories out there where the hero makes mistakes, and is even applauded for them. But many times in the end, the hero realizes his mistakes, and redemption themes follow. The HP series ISN’T COMPLETE. I will await judgment on the value of the whole, until the whole of it is complete.

Sometimes the main character’s job in the story, is to show the reader what NOT to do, and the consequences of following urges. Shakespear made a wonderful collection of works doing this very thing!

If your argument against HP is that it is Anti-Christian, then I implore you to read “Finding God in Harry Potter” by John Granger. I have posted links to a whole chapter excerpt from this book, in a previous HP post. It offers a deeper knowledge of symbolism and literary tools to portray themes of christianity in the HP books. Well worth an afternoon to read! The excerpt in particular is on magic and why the ‘magic’ found in the story is harmless and not against Christian teaching.

A child who is raised in the Faith should have no problem reading HP and POINTING OUT where Harry has been difficult, uncharitable, sinning, etc.- and follow with what he should/could have done to prevent the problem at the end. I use it as a tool. I know my child likes Harry and the other characters, and can relate to them, because of this I can make an excellent example of the characters and their errors.

I think much of the problem is that JK Rowlings is a subtle author. There are any number of themes through her books, and she never really lays any out on the table for thorough explaination. The reader is allowed to just read it for entertainment without getting beat over the head with themes and symbolism if they choose. On the other hand, it seems that she has laced a number of themes through her stories- interesting and dare I say CHRISTIAN ones if you choose to see them.

I congratulate her on making reading COOL again, wether or not you choose to read HP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top