What do you think about humanist chaplains?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sidetrack
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

sidetrack

Guest
I read about it here (atheism.about.com/b/2009/05/15/humanist-chaplains-in-the-dutch-army.htm) and was a bit bewildered that such a thing is made possible.I mean does this mean that the ppl in the Belgian and Dutch armies are intellectual enough or can be considered “ideologue” enough that most of them are into humanist philosophy or simply that they do this b/c they dont have an issue with advice from a chaplain who doesn’t follow a certain religion?.
 
I read about it here (atheism.about.com/b/2009/05/15/humanist-chaplains-in-the-dutch-army.htm) and was a bit bewildered that such a thing is made possible.I mean does this mean that the ppl in the Belgian and Dutch armies are intellectual enough or can be considered “ideologue” enough that most of them are into humanist philosophy or simply that they do this b/c they dont have an issue with advice from a chaplain who doesn’t follow a certain religion?.
I think it’s a very, VERY loud minority. Considering there are more Orthodox and Buddhists in the Army and (last I got a report) ZERO of either on active duty (in the US anyway), it’s trouble-making. Chaplains can help with any issue that a humanist has outside of religion. And I’m assuming that’s “athiest-humanist”, by the way.
 
I read about it here (atheism.about.com/b/2009/05/15/humanist-chaplains-in-the-dutch-army.htm) and was a bit bewildered that such a thing is made possible.I mean does this mean that the ppl in the Belgian and Dutch armies are intellectual enough or can be considered “ideologue” enough that most of them are into humanist philosophy or simply that they do this b/c they dont have an issue with advice from a chaplain who doesn’t follow a certain religion?.
You must remember that the faith is largely dead in Europe. This is especially true of Holland, I’m not sure about Belgium. I disagree heartily with the last paragraph, I don’t want any atiest any where near giving any kind of advice to my troops, except to give directions to the nearest head.
 
I really don’t see why this is an issue. No one is advocating getting rid of religious chaplains, just adding personnel to tend to the needs of those of us who aren’t religious. And yes, there are many non believing members of the military, and they deserve the same care and respect for their service to our nation as the religious troops.

The members of our military are faced with death every day. I could easily see it being beneficial for someone who doesn’t believe in life after death to be able to talk to someone with the same belief about their fears and concerns. Not to mention when someone in a troop’s family dies and they can’t be with their family during that time it is nice for them to have someone to turn to. And of course just like Catholics go to priests when atheists have moral dilemmas in their lives they like having a third party with the same basic outlooks to turn to.

No one wants to take anything from the religious, just give the same emotional and spiritual support to the non religious.
 
I really don’t see why this is an issue. No one is advocating getting rid of religious chaplains, just adding personnel to tend to the needs of those of us who aren’t religious. And yes, there are many non believing members of the military, and they deserve the same care and respect for their service to our nation as the religious troops.
They will soon. Within 20 years.

Understand that America is a nation built on the notion of Live and Let Live, that non-judgmentalism is the way we avoid arguments, we avoid conflict, and we just let us be. It can’t entirely be denied that this is a pretty successful argument, given the pluralistic nature of our nation. Live and Let Live among a myriad of 40,000 Protestant denominations has done well for this nation…until a subversive who would seek to undermine everything America stands for sneaks in.

This is how the Bolsheviks subverted Russia, by undermining the military during WWI. A less pluralistic society would have a better defense against such subversion.

When Tokugawa took over, ending the near 100 year civil wars in Japan during the Sengoku Period in the 17th Century, he ordered all gaijin (foreigners) out of the country, and all foreign influence, namely, among them, guns, and Christianity (guns he kept for himself). The reason was that foreign powers had a stake in the instability of Japan, and it was better for Japan to be culturally isolated from such influence (as far as the Shogun was concerned).

If you were a Gaijin and showed up in Japan after that, they’d politely tell you to leave. If you didn’t, you died.

This enabled Japan to live peacably (relatively speaking) for 200 years. At the same time they were technologically stunted, but they were able to recover in 20 years of dedicated work and devotion. That is the power of a singular Culture, united, especially, by faith.

This is a strength America fundamentally lacks. The ability to keep out subversive elements. It will not stand for long. It can’t, because people have no fundamental loyalty. They haven’t for fear of being labeled bigoted, judgmental, or whatever.
 
They will soon. Within 20 years.

Understand that America is a nation built on the notion of Live and Let Live, that non-judgmentalism is the way we avoid arguments, we avoid conflict, and we just let us be. It can’t entirely be denied that this is a pretty successful argument, given the pluralistic nature of our nation. Live and Let Live among a myriad of 40,000 Protestant denominations has done well for this nation…until a subversive who would seek to undermine everything America stands for sneaks in.

This is how the Bolsheviks subverted Russia, by undermining the military during WWI. A less pluralistic society would have a better defense against such subversion.

When Tokugawa took over, ending the near 100 year civil wars in Japan during the Sengoku Period in the 17th Century, he ordered all gaijin (foreigners) out of the country, and all foreign influence, namely, among them, guns, and Christianity (guns he kept for himself). The reason was that foreign powers had a stake in the instability of Japan, and it was better for Japan to be culturally isolated from such influence (as far as the Shogun was concerned).

If you were a Gaijin and showed up in Japan after that, they’d politely tell you to leave. If you didn’t, you died.

This enabled Japan to live peacably (relatively speaking) for 200 years. At the same time they were technologically stunted, but they were able to recover in 20 years of dedicated work and devotion. That is the power of a singular Culture, united, especially, by faith.

This is a strength America fundamentally lacks. The ability to keep out subversive elements. It will not stand for long. It can’t, because people have no fundamental loyalty. They haven’t for fear of being labeled bigoted, judgmental, or whatever.
You know, it’s really disrespectful to the people who volunteer for the military and knowingly risk their lives to call them “subversive”. They take the same oaths as everyone else, face the same dangers, and some even die. They show their “fundamental loyalty” every day. Show some respect, even if they don’t share your religious beliefs.
 
You must remember that the faith is largely dead in Europe. This is especially true of Holland, I’m not sure about Belgium. I disagree heartily with the last paragraph, I don’t want any atiest any where near giving any kind of advice to my troops, except to give directions to the nearest head.
I am from Belgium and I would not say that faith is largely dead there, but there are lots of secular humanists in Belgium. Whether they are a minority or a majority depends on whether cradle Christians are counted as Christians. In any case, no Catholic chaplain I know of will ever complain about the situation in the Belgian army, where there are humanist ‘chaplains’ (BTW they are not called ‘chaplains’ but ‘consultants’ or something) working alongside Catholic chaplains, and , where possible, also chaplains of other Chrsitian denominations, and of Islam.
Most of the time they work together in mutual respect.
This is also the case in Belgian hospitals. The largest Belgian hospital, UZ Gasthuisberg, belonging to the Catholic University of Leuven has at least one humanist consultant and in all other hospitals that I know of, lots of which belong to a Catholic congregation, it is possible to ask for a humanist consultant.
I really do not see why this is such a problem. And I am really amazed to hear that Belgium and the Netherlands are the only two countries where this is possible. I think in this case, they are an example for the rest of the world.
 
The members of our military are faced with death every day. I could easily see it being beneficial for someone who doesn’t believe in life after death to be able to talk to someone with the same belief about their fears and concerns.

No one wants to take anything from the religious, just give the same emotional and spiritual support to the non religious.
Except that… this isn’t what chaplains do. It isn’t like there are chaplains of every stripe assigned to each unit – when they’re lucky enough to get a chaplain (that’s “a” as in “one”), they have to take what they can get. And so, each chaplain is bound to tend to the spiritual needs of the personnel to whom s/he’s been assigned.

So, for the vast majority of atheists in the military, they won’t have access to an atheist ‘chaplain’; and, for the vast majority of theists in the military, an atheist ‘chaplain’ would be useless.

Looking at it from a very pragmatic (Machiavellian (?)) perspective, one of the main reasons that the military even have chaplains is for the sake of morale. So, tell me: how good for morale will it be for deployed soldiers to be told, “yeah, I believe that when you die, that’s all she wrote – you’re done for, and there’s nothing after that…” ? I can’t imagine that this is the kind of “morale” that the military’s looking for…

It seems to me to just be a way for a special interest group to lobby for a ‘right’ … 🤷

ETA: oh, btw … one of the functions of chaplains is to lead (non-denominational) prayer services. How would a humanist chaplain maintain their integrity while praying to anything?!? :confused:
 
Except that… this isn’t what chaplains do. It isn’t like there are chaplains of every stripe assigned to each unit – when they’re lucky enough to get a chaplain (that’s “a” as in “one”), they have to take what they can get. And so, each chaplain is bound to tend to the spiritual needs of the personnel to whom s/he’s been assigned.

So, for the vast majority of atheists in the military, they won’t have access to an atheist ‘chaplain’; and, for the vast majority of theists in the military, an atheist ‘chaplain’ would be useless.

Looking at it from a very pragmatic (Machiavellian (?)) perspective, one of the main reasons that the military even have chaplains is for the sake of morale. So, tell me: how good for morale will it be for deployed soldiers to be told, “yeah, I believe that when you die, that’s all she wrote – you’re done for, and there’s nothing after that…” ? I can’t imagine that this is the kind of “morale” that the military’s looking for…

It seems to me to just be a way for a special interest group to lobby for a ‘right’ … 🤷
I am not sure that the military is looking for a morale that says, “you’ve suffered much here, pall, but you are going to suffer even more for eternity because you happen to not believe in my God”
 
Oh… and I had to laugh at the reporter’s lack of knowledge:
“Being a humanist is very common in Holland, so I don’t need to explain what it is that I do. Here I do,” said Eline during an interview in her cluttered office at the Dutch military headquarters, which was adorned with a Santa Claus doll wearing a hat with a cross on it.
Umm… “Santa wearing a hat with a cross on it”? :rotfl: That’d be St Nicholas wearing his miter, thank you very much.
 
Except that… this isn’t what chaplains do. It isn’t like there are chaplains of every stripe assigned to each unit – when they’re lucky enough to get a chaplain (that’s “a” as in “one”), they have to take what they can get. And so, each chaplain is bound to tend to the spiritual needs of the personnel to whom s/he’s been assigned.

So, for the vast majority of atheists in the military, they won’t have access to an atheist ‘chaplain’; and, for the vast majority of theists in the military, an atheist ‘chaplain’ would be useless.

Looking at it from a very pragmatic (Machiavellian (?)) perspective, one of the main reasons that the military even have chaplains is for the sake of morale. So, tell me: how good for morale will it be for deployed soldiers to be told, “yeah, I believe that when you die, that’s all she wrote – you’re done for, and there’s nothing after that…” ? I can’t imagine that this is the kind of “morale” that the military’s looking for…

It seems to me to just be a way for a special interest group to lobby for a ‘right’ … 🤷

ETA: oh, btw … one of the functions of chaplains is to lead (non-denominational) prayer services. How would a humanist chaplain maintain their integrity while praying to anything?!? :confused:
Yes and no. On deployment you pretty much take what you can get. However on most bases there is usually access to Christian, Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, etc chaplains. They hold social events to bring like minded troops together, specifically the young ones who are away from home for the first time and don’t really know anyone yet. They lead community service projects. They provide premarital and marriage counseling. They perform weddings. Most have an “open door policy” for anyone who needs an ear or advice. There is nothing wrong with nonbelievers getting the same support from someone who feels the way that they do. It’s the exact same reason that Christians wouldn’t feel as comfortable going to a Muslim, and a Muslim wouldn’t feel as comfortable going to a Buddhist.

As for “morale”, that is so patronizing. “We know that you believe that after you die you cease to exist, and you willingly joined the military knowing that you may have to sacrifice your life. But we simply can’t bring in someone who would acknowledge that belief because that would ruin your morale”. Yeah, at best that’s disrespectful.

When I lived on an Air Force base a chaplain organized a field trip to the creationist museum for any airman who wanted to sign up. Why is that ok but having someone on hand to tend to the emotional and spiritual needs of atheists and agnostics not?
 
As for “morale”, that is so patronizing. “We know that you believe that after you die you cease to exist, and you willingly joined the military knowing that you may have to sacrifice your life. But we simply can’t bring in someone who would acknowledge that belief because that would ruin your morale”. Yeah, at best that’s disrespectful.
No, you misunderstand. I’m not trying to be patronizing or disrespectful. I’m not talking about your morale, as an atheist – I’m talking about the morale of your theist fellows-in-arms!
When I lived on an Air Force base a chaplain organized a field trip to the creationist museum for any airman who wanted to sign up. Why is that ok but having someone on hand to tend to the emotional and spiritual needs of atheists and agnostics not?
Are you a member of a religious organization? Do you have a system of belief? Does your world view include a faith component?
 
Yes and no. On deployment you pretty much take what you can get. However on most bases there is usually access to Christian, Islamic, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, etc chaplains. They hold social events to bring like minded troops together, specifically the young ones who are away from home for the first time and don’t really know anyone yet. They lead community service projects. They provide premarital and marriage counseling. They perform weddings. Most have an “open door policy” for anyone who needs an ear or advice. There is nothing wrong with nonbelievers getting the same support from someone who feels the way that they do. It’s the exact same reason that Christians wouldn’t feel as comfortable going to a Muslim, and a Muslim wouldn’t feel as comfortable going to a Buddhist.

As for “morale”, that is so patronizing. “We know that you believe that after you die you cease to exist, and you willingly joined the military knowing that you may have to sacrifice your life. But we simply can’t bring in someone who would acknowledge that belief because that would ruin your morale”. Yeah, at best that’s disrespectful.

When I lived on an Air Force base a chaplain organized a field trip to the creationist museum for any airman who wanted to sign up. Why is that ok but having someone on hand to tend to the emotional and spiritual needs of atheists and agnostics not?
You are, at best, misinformed:
army.mil/article/56452/
news.iskcon.com/node/4156

The vast overwhelming majority of chaplains in the Army are Christian of some bent. There are a few Immams, a handfull of Rabbais and (as best as I have been able to find) a grand total of one (1) chaplain for buddhists and hindus. A chaplain is there to provide support for all of his troops, no matter what the faith. The basic counselling of any soldier suffering from the pains of life can be handled by any chaplain, or by the military’s mental health professionals. Atheistic Humanist chaplains would simply put an un-needed strain on an already stretched budget military wide without bringing any of the benefits of faith coverage that a Chaplain provides. Most FOBs have one (1) chaplain for upwards of thousands of men. Who is going to handle the faith needs of that vast majority? Or does the majority get to suffer because a tiny, vocal minority needs one more preson they can talk to and feel special about who is unable to speak on any faith in any form?
 
You are, at best, misinformed:
army.mil/article/56452/
news.iskcon.com/node/4156

The vast overwhelming majority of chaplains in the Army are Christian of some bent. There are a few Immams, a handfull of Rabbais and (as best as I have been able to find) a grand total of one (1) chaplain for buddhists and hindus. A chaplain is there to provide support for all of his troops, no matter what the faith. The basic counselling of any soldier suffering from the pains of life can be handled by any chaplain, or by the military’s mental health professionals. Atheistic Humanist chaplains would simply put an un-needed strain on an already stretched budget military wide without bringing any of the benefits of faith coverage that a Chaplain provides. Most FOBs have one (1) chaplain for upwards of thousands of men. Who is going to handle the faith needs of that vast majority? Or does the majority get to suffer because a tiny, vocal minority needs one more preson they can talk to and feel special about who is unable to speak on any faith in any form?
You’ll have to excuse me, most of my information comes from working with chaplains on an air force base (premarital counseling and teaming up with the chaplains office for community service projects.) So I don’t know how the military works as a whole in that area. But upon looking up the specific base that I was on you’re correct. All of the chaplains at that particular base were protestant. However, those chaplains do a lot of community outreach and find other religious leaders in the area that are willing to have troops referred to them when they are in a time of crisis or need advice/an ear. They also make every effort to have Rabbis, Immams, Priests, etc come to base once a week to have services. This all seems perfectly fair to me. It would be hard to make sure to have a chaplain of every religion, but they do make every effort to make sure that they have specific resources for other religions.

Because chaplains can be of any faith as long as they can serve everyone openly and fairly, I don’t see why having a humanist one would be an issue. Or at the very least finding humanist resources much in the same way that they do for Muslims. The number of nonbelievers in this country is skyrocketing, and that includes in the military. All of our troops deserve the best support possible that aligns with their deeply held personal beliefs.
 
No, you misunderstand. I’m not trying to be patronizing or disrespectful. I’m not talking about your morale, as an atheist – I’m talking about the morale of your theist fellows-in-arms!

Are you a member of a religious organization? Do you have a system of belief? Does your world view include a faith component?
I expect our military to act as adults. That means acknowledging that others have different beliefs and that that’s ok. I would say that the troop who loses morale because the guy next to him is being advised by a fellow atheist has some pretty serious issues.

No, I am not a member of any religious organization. But the fact that I don’t believe in god very heavily shapes my worldview, morals, the way I live, and the choices I make.
 
I am from Belgium and I would not say that faith is largely dead there, but there are lots of secular humanists in Belgium. Whether they are a minority or a majority depends on whether cradle Christians are counted as Christians. In any case, no Catholic chaplain I know of will ever complain about the situation in the Belgian army, where there are humanist ‘chaplains’ (BTW they are not called ‘chaplains’ but ‘consultants’ or something) working alongside Catholic chaplains, and , where possible, also chaplains of other Chrsitian denominations, and of Islam.
Most of the time they work together in mutual respect.
This is also the case in Belgian hospitals. The largest Belgian hospital, UZ Gasthuisberg, belonging to the Catholic University of Leuven has at least one humanist consultant and in all other hospitals that I know of, lots of which belong to a Catholic congregation, it is possible to ask for a humanist consultant.
I really do not see why this is such a problem. And I am really amazed to hear that Belgium and the Netherlands are the only two countries where this is possible. I think in this case, they are an example for the rest of the world.
Thank you for shedding some light on the subject. It is always possible for stories to get blown out of proportion or the writer hasn’t done the proper investigation.

🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top