Except that… this isn’t what chaplains do. It isn’t like there are chaplains of every stripe assigned to each unit – when they’re lucky enough to get a chaplain (that’s “a” as in “one”), they have to take what they can get. And so, each chaplain is bound to tend to the spiritual needs of the personnel to whom s/he’s been assigned.
So, for the vast majority of atheists in the military, they won’t have access to an atheist ‘chaplain’; and, for the vast majority of theists in the military, an atheist ‘chaplain’ would be useless.
Looking at it from a very pragmatic (Machiavellian (?)) perspective, one of the main reasons that the military even
have chaplains is for the sake of morale. So, tell me: how good for morale will it be for deployed soldiers to be told, “yeah, I believe that when you die, that’s all she wrote – you’re done for, and there’s nothing after that…” ? I can’t imagine that this is the kind of “morale” that the military’s looking for…
It seems to me to just be a way for a special interest group to lobby for a ‘right’ …
ETA: oh, btw … one of the functions of chaplains is to lead (non-denominational) prayer services. How would a humanist chaplain maintain their integrity while praying to
anything?!?