P
pnewton
Guest
Thank you. I was unaware of that. However, the intro clause is “in cases where…” and “may” is used. So has the USCCB enacted any such listing of instruments? If not, then I do not think this applies, but then I am no canon lawyer. On a side note, I find it interesting that this is one of the first times I have ever seen an national ecclessial body actually given specific authority. So much for the idea that they have no real authority and are advisory only.Actually, the CDWDS removed the issue of musical instruments from the purview of the local bishop. In its 2001 letter to the USCCB concerning adaptations to the GIRM, the CDWDS noted the following:
I know. However, I am indigenous. How many centuries does it take for a people to be considered indigenous? I still think the principle applies. Look at the leeway give Anglican use parishes where the whole Church converts.Regarding the point that you raised about inculturation, it applies more along the lines of indigenous peoples and not necessarily Protestant ecclesial communities.