W
Wammy101
Guest
I am interested to know what the rest of you thinkon the issue of homosexuality. i personally have NO problem with it. I think it is fine. i was just wondering what the rest of you thought.
Cool, me too - I respect the Catholic church for it’s position (and I understand it) but God has not called me to appreciate it yet - maybe he will maybe he won’t…I am interested to know what the rest of you thinkon the issue of homosexuality. i personally have NO problem with it. I think it is fine. i was just wondering what the rest of you thought.
GO LIBERO!Cool, me too - I respect the Catholic church for it’s position (and I understand it) but God has not called me to appreciate it yet - maybe he will maybe he won’t…
Anywho - is this the curse of the young people?.. Dun dun dunnnn
You think it doesn’t affect you but in a subtle way it does. As for being stuck in turmoil or denial, that doesn’t have to happen either, they can live a chaste life.Hey, what other people do in their bedrooms in their spare time doesnt influence me in the tiniest bit. Besides, its better if they know and accept the way they are instead of being stuck in turnoil or denial.
Now, Christus Rex has the teaching down pretty well here.Homosexuality isn’t normal, but homosexuals are God’s children like everyone else and I don’t have a problem with them. It is not a sin to be a homosexual.
However homosexual acts are wrong.
…you have a very special place in the Church. You have been called to have no other partner in life than Him. The world does not understand this…
:nope: “To each his own.” = relativism = an evil undermining of the entire Catholic Faith…but relativism is for another thread.To each his own.
tom.wineman said:**This thread has all the trappings of the usual “Gay Pride Week” **propaganda plant
Whammy, are you a Catholic?I am interested to know what the rest of you thinkon the issue of homosexuality. i personally have NO problem with it. I think it is fine. i was just wondering what the rest of you thought.
tom.wineman said:**This thread has all the trappings of the usual “Gay Pride Week” **propaganda plant
JSmitty2005 said::nope: “To each his own.” = relativism = an evil undermining of the entire Catholic Faith…but relativism is for another thread.
That homosexuality is wrong is not unique to Catholicism. What is undeniably being imposed (at leat attempted) is the universal acceptence of homosexual acts.On the contrary, I simply don’t impose Catholic teaching on noncatholics. Now if they were to join the Churhc they must follow the rules.
What about atheists? Personally I believe that SSA is unavoidable in many who develop it. But behavior can always be modified to be heterosexual or celibate.That homosexuality is wrong is not unique to Catholicism. What is undeniably being imposed (at leat attempted) is the universal acceptence of homosexual acts.
What about them? That is, I’m sure that there are atheists that can discern the wrongness of homosexuality using non-theistic arguments.What about atheists?
I don’t know and Church teaching doesn’t speculate on the whys:Personally I believe that SSA is unavoidable in many who develop it.
Even if one could show that SSA was completely unavaoidable (a genetic disposition for instance) the truth about the wrongness of homosexual acts would be unchanged.2357 Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained.
Or to put it plainly, no one is forced by genetics, upbringing or whatever one ascribes SSA to, to engage in a homosexual act.But behavior can always be modified to be heterosexual or celibate.
What about them? That is, I’m sure that there are atheists that can discern the wrongness of homosexuality using non-theistic arguments.
I don’t know and Church teaching doesn’t speculate on the whys:
Even if one could show that SSA was completely unavaoidable (a genetic disposition for instance) the truth about the wrongness of homosexual acts would be unchanged.
SSA with me was unavoidable. I do not fit the descriptions of any of the theories of its causes. I only know that while desiring only heterosexual relationships I constantly have an underlying admiration for certain males. That to me is SSA and it has been there for as long as I can remember.
Or to put it plainly, no one is forced by genetics, upbringing or whatever one ascribes SSA to, to engage in a homosexual act.
Scott
I only know that with myself SSA has always been there, meaning an admiration for certain males. Yet I’ve only desired heterosexual relationships.What about them? That is, I’m sure that there are atheists that can discern the wrongness of homosexuality using non-theistic arguments.
I don’t know and Church teaching doesn’t speculate on the whys:
Even if one could show that SSA was completely unavaoidable (a genetic disposition for instance) the truth about the wrongness of homosexual acts would be unchanged.
Or to put it plainly, no one is forced by genetics, upbringing or whatever one ascribes SSA to, to engage in a homosexual act.
Scott