P
poche
Guest
That is what sin does. It destroys and it has effects far beyond what we realize.
He sure is, even as the ECF were all YEC.Mark H Armitage is a young earth creation scientist.
That doesn’t make it right or Ok, now does it. We pray for reparation against insults, indifference and blasphemies against Jesus in the Catholic Church. I note you have not answered a question on your religion, but note you are not a practicing Catholic. I am sure Christians of other faiths do not tolerate the Christ being insulted either.I guess that is slightly better than the Book I read where Christ is compared to a “door”.
Now that is down right insulting.Yeah, that does seem long in this day of sound bytes and chompin’ at the 'bits, but I suppose looking at a lot of text might be hard for this ‘age of twitter-pated’. Think of how laborious Psalms 119 is (just looking at it, wow, dizzying for someone who hasn’t scaled those heights), or mercy of Heaven, Isaiah (it has 66 chapters!), and forget about the whole of the thing, it’s over a thousand pages long. I heard Dr. Seuss was much shorter, and Hop on Pop, had depth of theology in brevity.
I am a Christian, of the oldest sort, which reaches even unto the end.I note you have not answered a question on your religion
What was that rebuttal you used on another thread to someone citing a scholarly consensus about a point with which you disagreed?As I said, the ECF, nearly unanimously taught that:
That was a joke.It does not. The Catholic Church teaches nothing of the sort.
its pretty simple when we experience the last of its kind at the end of its life.I have always wondered how anyone can make a statement that “X number of Y and Z have ceased to exist”. What they seem to be trying to do is to prove a negative.
Extinctions and the current Mass Extinction is the realm of science. Your idea that scientists ‘refute’ or ‘think to refute’ what Christians hold really makes little sense considering the great number of Scientists who are also Christian. Our Pope is also a scientist.That aside, we have objections to scientists when they think they can refute any number of things which Christians hold. When sicentists get outside the realm of science, they are out of their field.
Being a public forum, we should be careful in expousing what we believe and are taught, given the cabal of conspiracy theories and anti Christian sentiment online.That was a joke.
And yet, some of us will insist on having a sense of humor.Being a public forum, we should be careful in expousing what we believe and are taught, given the cabal of conspiracy theories and anti Christian sentiment online.
The latter is extremely rare. The former is a wonderful find and usually due to dedicated research scientists.And periodically we find something we never knew existed, and we find something which was declared extinct.
200 x 365 = 73000 flora and faun extinct per year
Why are you singling out scientists vs theologians. What is your purpose for doing so?Maybe my comment about scientists sticking to science and theologians sticking to theology doesn’t make sense to you; you might want to re-read the thread.
And those people have the right to think that, the Catholic Church has said we are free to believe or not that this happened. Why would you take that right away from fellow Catholics?There are also people who think the whole workd was flooded at one short period of time.
Throughout most of history, scientist which comes from the Latin scientia, literally knowledge meant a broad range of things. Philosophy, natural science, even theology were all sciences.Why are you singling out scientists vs theologians. What is your purpose for doing so?