B
BoomerangToo
Guest
Righteous anger. Like Jesus with the money changers. It’s hard to stand idly by and watch the destruction of our beloved Church.So what drives Church Militant
Righteous anger. Like Jesus with the money changers. It’s hard to stand idly by and watch the destruction of our beloved Church.So what drives Church Militant
Don’t we all regard all our anger as “righteous” anger?catholic1seeks:![]()
Righteous anger. Like Jesus with the money changers. It’s hard to stand idly by and watch the destruction of our beloved Church.So what drives Church Militant
Church Militant seeks a return to a past period of glory for the Catholic Church back before the Vatican 2 Council and have painted a picture of what life and religious life and the church was back then as their goal.What drives Catholic groups like Church Militant?
And this is the very reason why episcopal oversight is useful, keeping us from our tunnel vision of ourselves as righteous, and others as worthy of our anger.Don’t we all regard all our anger as “righteous” anger?
Attention maybe, I don’t see where there is any money in their activities.I think they are motivated by money & attention.
The Internet.So what drives Church Militant, along with their tone and their methods?
For those of us that do not watch him, why?Check out the following:
If homosexual acts are sinful then how is it “ok to be gay”? Struggling with sin doesn’t make it “ok”.It’s ok to be gay and Catholic, no dif than any of us in that we’re all sinners.
The issue that good Catholics have with what’s going on today is normalizing active/practicing homosexuality.
Homosexual acts are inherently sinful.
So is adultry, for example, and we should never try to normalize homosexuality any more than we would any other grave sin.
Gays can be as Catholic as any sinner (any of us), but also just like any of us they too are called to repentance for their sins, and conversion from a life of sin to a life of holiness.
Being heterosexual is the order in which God intended. Again you’re using these modern words for hetero and homosexual. They aren’t a separate people or a “community” that just have different disordered desires, and as long as they keep it inside, it’s “ok”.Being gay and committing homosexual acts are two different things.
I can be heterosexual and not engage in sexual activities the same as someone can be homosexual (gay) and not engage in sexual activities.
Big distinction there between having disordered desires and actually acting on them.
Big distinction.
“Deny yourself, pick up your cross, and follow after Christ”
You continuously attempt to twist my words in order to make their meaning something else.Again you’re [ saying that and as long as they keep it inside, it’s “ok”.]
but to say it’s “ok” as long as they don’t act on it, is NOT good.
To say it’s “ok” is to call their struggle trivial. but this level of tolerance has to go. I am sorry, but there is no major distinction between the thought/desire and the act. It’s even worse to say that the thoughts/desires are “ok”.
Have a lovely weekend.