C
CHRISTINE77
Guest
The worst thing is to disregard a woman’s soul when you are attracted to her body. Women are more, much more, than their bodies.hi everyone. i don’t post here much (as i forgot about this site and just happily rediscovered it again), but i wanted to add my 2 cents to this discussion.
I think we men are fantasizing when we imagine being able to look at physically attractive women without feeling sexual desire without neutering ourselves. Yes, there are those certain times when we can. When we’re in a really dry state and can look at a beautiful woman purely on aesthetics.
But to act like we can or should somehow train ourselves to never have a sexual reaction from the sight, sound, or thought of a woman just seems disingenuous to me, and I tend to agree with the earlier post that says you’d have better luck simply training yourself to react negatively altogether.
I think its dishonest to reduce a woman’s attractiveness to a purely aesthetic or artistic value. Those aspects exist but the sexual reaction that pulls males to females is ALSO a part of the design and should not be utterly cut out of the response. I think PAIRING our sexual desire for a woman with thoughts of the woman’s higher value that counteracts our lower tendencies makes much more sense than training yourself not to have the sexual urges.
Otherwise I’ll need to put my hands together and ask God to miraculously remove my sexual response, but since he miraculously gave me my sexual response in the first place, this attitude just seems reactionary, short-sighted, and somewhat disrespectful.