C
CalmDownWisWins
Guest
Are you referring to me… I do believe there is a …(thing) that is the creative thing in the universe. No God necessary…
We actually agree. You simply have a different definition of God. Your God is a subset of my God.
I like Kurzweil. I hope the singularity happens. I see no contradiction in believing in simultaneously believing in God and the singularity. Should the singularity actually happen, it would be a gift from God. The tricky bit is whether the apparatus which brings on the singularity is God directed, by true (authentic) Catholics, or by anyone else.Did you read both essays?
If it is brought to us by non-Catholics, it will cause a cataclysm which will anihilate those who try to “pass through” the singularity and reduce the rest of humanity to a tiny remnant.
I agree that the shear existence of the universe, and our ability to observe it without being destroyed while trying to do so, is really all the evidence for God that we need.I’ve sometimes ask the question whether there is a God. I have answered, if you doubt the existence of God, take a look around. Imagine the world 3.8 billion years ago (origin of life), imagine it 500 million years ago (cambrian explosion), 3 million years ago (the dawn of Homo habilis and primative Olduwan tools), 10 thousand years ago (agriculture), 50 years ago (first computer and discovery of the structure of DNA), and now. If that isn’t evidence for the existence of God, I do not know what is.
The revelation given by Him to humanity is just frosting on the cake, and our only REAL salvational “tool” because of the inherent “hard headedness” (hard heartedness) of humanity.
The only way the brute-of-mankind is overcome by the good-of-mankind is by way of listening to God in humilty in His “guise” of “conscience”, and with as powerful an intellect as possible in a state of abject worshipful prayer.
Any REAL scientist knows precisely what is meant by “prayerful inquiry” using the scientific method.