C
cranster
Guest
A fixed term punishment would be appropriate If the sin were strictly commited by a limited being against a limited being then the punishment should be limited. but when a limited being, (human) sins against an unlimited being (God) then the punishment is unlimited.Hell is supposed to be 100% awful and everlasting. It is hard to think of anything that merits such a punishment. I may not be a very good person and I may not think that the evidence merits belief in God but I cannot think this merits an eternity of agony!
A fixed term punishment or anihilation would be more proportionate.
That is if the limited being commits a sin that God determines merits eternal death as in a mortal sin. When the angels were tested one third fell from heaven. They are far different beings than humans. They saw God as He is and knew completely every aspect of their decision to defy God. Their punishment was final and eternal. Humans have not seen God as He is and do not fully understand what it means to sin against God, so God in His love, and mercy knowing this decided to give us a second chance in the person of Jesus. Only an unlimited being, (God) could satisfy the divine demands of justice when a mortal offense is committed against an unlimited being, (God). That is what Jesus did up there on the cross. He satisfied the divine demands of justice that we could not satisfy ourselves.
The will is set at death, either towards God or against God. God will only affirm our decision in life to either accept Him by living as He commands through loving one another and repenting from sin, or reject Him by not living as He commands, and provides a place for either decision.
Being that we are limited and God is unlimited His thoughts are infinitely above ours. Just because we in our limited understanding perceive eternal separation from God for a life of rejection of God, and unrepentant sin as unjust doesn’t make it so. The time for mercy is NOW, not after death.