M
misstherese
Guest
When we have not married yet and are in the house we listen to our parents. That’s correct.
I’m not really talking about personality, but more of the fact that man was given dominion the earth. That would mean women are to submit to an authority. Many people think submission is a terrible thing and it’s not. It’s simply acceptance of authority. I think God knew that the world needed a leading voice or force, so that is why He made man first and made him have dominion over women and animals.
That doesn’t mean women don’t have a say in things, that just means men were chosen as leaders to help both sexes come to a consensus on things.
373 In God’s plan man and woman have the vocation of “subduing” the earth248 as stewards of God. This sovereignty is not to be an arbitrary and destructive domination. God calls man and woman, made in the image of the Creator “who loves everything that exists”,249 to share in his providence toward other creatures; hence their responsibility for the world God has entrusted to them.
I don’t think that girls necessarily need a “role” simply because boys/men do with regard to serving at the altar. That said I do recall that one bishop opened the ministry of sacristan to girls after he abolished female altar servers.What role then do you suppose than girls (not women, but girls) fill in a church community?
Serving at the altar is not “carrying candles and fetching things.” A man or boy serves at the altar to conform himself to Christ and unite themselves to his sacrifice. Let us never forget that a priest is alter Christus - another Christ. Males serve because they want to become like Christ. Since Christ is a man, women cannot become like Christ like men can. Women are called to be handmaids of the Lord like the Blessed Mother.Carrying candles and fetching things is not something that is masculine or feminine. I liked doing it, as it is a task well suited for children 8-12 or so, and I don’t think that in any way it made me less feminine or is a service that is unique to masculinity.
Always sad to see someone throw the “sexist” bomb. How utterly misplaced.Then the priests at my church would be doing mass with no help. Seriously no altar boys at my parish. Two girls. Stop being so sexist.
It is you who are spinning an ideology. Miss is actually expressing Biblical truth. See 1 Corinthians 11:3 below:Spin it as you will – but the “ideology” that “man has the higher authority” – is the sin of pride/the disorder against God who created women in His image and likeness
Spin it as you will - but that is not pride. Pride is an elevation of self worth. Authority does not equal that.
You’re misconstruing the clear words of St. Paul to fit your ideology. The quotation I provided from Corinthians clearly describes a natural hierarchy: Christ is the head of man, husband is head of wife.Every man and woman is part of the Bride – whose head is Christ. In marriage the domestic church is still the Bride – whose head is Christ. There is one head in a marriage - Christ.
She’s affirming reality. I’ve NEVER met a couple that was completely egalitarian. One partner always dominates the other. From my vantage, I see more women play the dominant role. But the natural order is for the man to be the guardian and protector of his household. I’m an ardent supporter of the patriarchyPride blinds one to the truth – and some women “co-operate” in affirming the sin of pride/one sex having “dominion/authority” over the other
Walking_Home:![]()
You’re misconstruing the clear words of St. Paul to fit your ideology. The quotation I provided from Corinthians clearly describes a natural hierarchy: Christ is the head of man, husband is head of wife.Every man and woman is part of the Bride – whose head is Christ. In marriage the domestic church is still the Bride – whose head is Christ. There is one head in a marriage - Christ.
The Bible clearly prescribes a hierarchical order of social relations. One can believe the Bible or believe the feminists. I choose God’s word over the world.
How can I ever express the happiness of a marriage joined by the Church, strengthened by an offering, sealed by a blessing, announced by angels, and ratified by the Father? . . . How wonderful the bond between two believers, now one in hope, one in desire, one in discipline, one in the same service! They are both children of one Father and servants of the same Master, undivided in spirit and flesh, truly two in one flesh. Where the flesh is one, one also is the spirit.151Not simply because they are women though.Women should definitely hold equal leadership roles within a parish, on the parish council and in other ministries.
The leader of a parish is the priest.Women should definitely hold equal leadership roles within a parish, on the parish council and in other ministries.
I mean lay positions, obviously. Parish council, director of education, other ministries that lay people lead.Wesrock:![]()
The leader of a parish is the priest.Women should definitely hold equal leadership roles within a parish, on the parish council and in other ministries.
I can see two schools of thought on this. Within reason (obviously you don’t want the parish council staffed by idiots, men or women), one might argue for maintaining a loose quota on the basis that making sure that both men and women are represented leads to a more beneficial and efficient council for the parish, even if all of the otherwise most individually qualified candidates were men (assuming such a hypothetical situation ever resulted, not presuming it would be the case). And vice versa, of course, you’d want men represented on some level even if all of the individually most qualified candidates were women.Wesrock:![]()
Not simply because they are women though.Women should definitely hold equal leadership roles within a parish, on the parish council and in other ministries.