J
JustaServant
Guest
In fifty words or less.

Depends on what youāre watching.In fifty words or less.
![]()
Iām speaking of Network, Cable, and now Streaming TV. The newer stuff.Depends on what youāre watching.
And I donāt mean that as a glib response. With how much TV there is out there today I donāt honestly find anything wrong with TV as a whole. I honestly believe there is something for everyone on TV these days regardless of what youāre interested, or not interested, in watching.
Understood. Still doesnāt change my answer. Thereās such a variety on those 3 different media, nevermind the web only TV, that thereās plenty for everyone and no overall trend that Iād consider annoying or not easily avoided.Iām speaking of Network, Cable, and now Streaming TV. The newer stuff.
I disagree. itās pretty well across the board.Understood. Still doesnāt change my answer. Thereās such a variety on those 3 different media, nevermind the web only TV, that thereās plenty for everyone and no overall trend that Iād consider annoying or not easily avoided.
To come up with an answer to your question I think you have to be much more specific speaking of specific networks or channels at the very least.
I agree. I find the show Criminal Minds to be disturbingly unwatchable.Just way too dark - too many police procedurals and shows about serial killers and cannibals and the like - there needs to be a balance of lighter programming with heart that shows life isnāt all a bleak struggle.
Good writing seems to be the problem. On Hulu Iām watching for the first time shows like Naked City, a police procedural with some of the best writing on TV at the time. Route 66 with genuine character studies far more absorbing than much of what I see today. Lou Grant from the 70s was still able to capture moments of great drama. And that comes from the writing. The world view is completely opposite.There is no subtlety. Everything is in your face and crass. Nothing is left to the imagination. There are very few shows that contain stories that move you in a way to be better. That promote just general goodness and stir your emotions towards the beautiful and sublime.
Just I know reality is not always great but I want to see the beautiful side of life as well. Like someone else said this is due to the absence of good writers or maybe just writers that want to write these type of stories![]()
Itās suddenly become trendy to muddy the waters of good and ill, in the name of ārealismā. For example, Game of Thrones takes it so far as to make it unrealistic; anyone remotely just or likeable in that show ends up dead, while despicable characters have preternaturally good luck.There is no subtlety. Everything is in your face and crass. Nothing is left to the imagination. There are very few shows that contain stories that move you in a way to be better. That promote just general goodness and stir your emotions towards the beautiful and sublime.
Just I know reality is not always great but I want to see the beautiful side of life as well. Like someone else said this is due to the absence of good writers or maybe just writers that want to write these type of stories![]()
The focus modern script writers put on sex shows an immature thought pattern. It distracts from their apparent inability to form a cohesive or compelling story with characters and situations one cares about. Thatās been the essence of storytelling since the days of the campfire tale-teller. Even the most primitive societies sung songs of great deeds by their ancestors.Short answer:
Too . . . . . much . . . . . sex.
Longer answer: (I realize that this is an over-generalization, but any answer would have to be.) Even when sex isnāt actually displayed, itās all about sex. Itās not about love, or relationships as much, just about sex. And the percentage of homosexuals seems high related to that in the regular population, but I havenāt done any statistical analysis on it. This would possibly have the purpose (and certainly have the effect) that people will think the incidence of homosexuality is higher than it is.
āJen