What is at stake in the mandate debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gilliam

Guest
Archbishop José H. Gomez writes about deep dangers the HHS mandate debate brings to the surface:

The federal government’s new mandate — requiring Catholic charities, schools, universities and hospitals to supply employees with health insurance that covers birth control, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs — has become maybe the most controversial issue of our day.

I’ve been inspired by the unified reaction from our Catholic community. The bishops of almost every diocese in the country have spoken out. So have our largest Catholic institutions. Many individual Catholics — of every political opinion — have united in opposition.

Other religious groups and many other Americans have also joined the protest — because this new mandate, of course, affects every employer in America.

As this debate continues, it is important to remember that the Catholic Church did not choose this conflict.

The Church wants to be a partner with our neighbors and our government in building a more just and peaceful society — a society more worthy of the dignity of the human person who is the image of God. The Church’s mission in our society is to teach, heal and to care for others; to pray and to lead our neighbors to God.

Our freedom to carry out our mission is totally threatened by this new mandate. But we are not just protecting our own parochial interests. As I have said, the issues at stake go far beyond the morality of contraception. This government mandate threatens the basic character of our society and puts every American’s freedom at risk.

America was founded to be a diverse society with many layers of institutions and affiliations.

America’s founders understood that human life is more than politics or economics. They created structures of government and an economic system intended to promote individual liberty. They also created a space of freedom in which a rich “civil society” could grow — all sorts of independent churches and religions, neighborhood groups, clubs, volunteer organizations, trade unions, leagues, charities, foundations and more.

In the founders’ vision of civil society, churches and religious agencies held a special place. They believed religion was essential for democracy to flourish because religion instills the values and virtues people need for self-government.

That’s why the First Amendment protects churches and individuals from the government meddling in what they believe, or in how they express and live out those beliefs. That’s also why the government has always felt comfortable providing funding for Church charities and ministries that serve the common good of all Americans.

What’s been happening in recent decades is that government at all levels has been exerting greater influence in almost every area of American life.

In the process, non-governmental institutions are being crowded out of our public life. Civil society is shrinking and the influence of civic associations in our lives is getting weaker. The rights and freedoms of churches are increasingly restricted by court orders and government policies. Religious freedom is now reduced to the freedom to pray and to go to church.

And more and more, Church agencies are now treated as if they are arms of the government. Increasingly, these agencies are expected to serve and submit to the government’s agendas and priorities.

None of this is good for our democracy or our individual liberties.

America’s founders knew that a strong civil society and flourishing faith communities are our last best protection against tyranny — against the government becoming too big and all-powerful and all-controlling in our lives.

That is why I think this new mandate has struck such a nerve — not only with Catholics and other believers, but also with millions of our fellow citizens.

People are realizing that if the government denies our fundamental freedom to hold religious beliefs and to order our lives according to these beliefs, then there is no real freedom for anyone.

This new mandate moves us closer to what Pope Benedict XVI warned against in his first encyclical, Deus Caritas Est (“God is Love”): “The state which would provide everything, absorbing everything into itself … a state which regulates and controls everything.”

When I first wrote about this new mandate two weeks ago, I said this is a time for Catholic action and Catholic voices. This is still the time.

We need to defend our rights as Catholics. Not only to pray and worship. But also to be able to express our faith through our Catholic institutions and to make our own contribution to the decisions that affect the common good and future of our society.

We also need to help our political leaders understand what is at stake in this debate. My brother bishops and I in the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops are supporting legislation that would rescind this unjust policy. For more information and to take action, visit the U.S. bishops’ website:usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/conscience-protection/index.cfm
Let’s pray for one another this week. And let’s ask Mary Immaculate, Patroness of the United States, to pray for our country.

Reprinted with permission of The Tidings, newspaper of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, in which this article first appeared Feb. 10, 2012.

Most Rev. José H. Gomez is the Archbishop of Los Angeles, California.
 
The Catholic Church is the canary in the mineshaft. If the Catholic Church fails to win this crystal clear attack of the First Amendment by the Obama administration, ALL Americans will lose their rights under the First Amendment!

The Catholic Church was chosen for this mission because so many Catholics voted for Obama in 2008. It stands to reason that if Catholics would vote for a president who clearly does not have the Catholic interest at heart, they wouldn’t seriously object to having their First Amendment rights trampled upon. Never mind that it opens the door to “mandating” into or out of the constitution anything by sole whim of the president, without due congressional oversight. Ultimately this means we, as a nation, will have not so formally ceded our rights under the Constitution to one man, who in essence will become America’s first elected “Dictator”.
 
The Catholic Church is the canary in the mineshaft. If the Catholic Church fails to win this crystal clear attack of the First Amendment by the Obama administration, ALL Americans will lose their rights under the First Amendment!

The Catholic Church was chosen for this mission because so many Catholics voted for Obama in 2008. It stands to reason that if Catholics would vote for a president who clearly does not have the Catholic interest at heart, they wouldn’t seriously object to having their First Amendment rights trampled upon. Never mind that it opens the door to “mandating” into or out of the constitution anything by sole whim of the president, without due congressional oversight. Ultimately this means we, as a nation, will have not so formally ceded our rights under the Constitution to one man, who in essence will become America’s first elected “Dictator”.
While I think that Catholic Democrats have been willfully ignorant on Obama’s intentions, the important test is what choice they will make now that Obama’s character has been fully revealed to everyone.

Here is a sample:
It isn’t only Kathy Dahlkemper and other “Stupak Democrats” who are eating crow. In that same press release was this assessment from the executive director of Democrats for Life, an organization of rapidly dwindling clients: “The [Obama] administration is already unfairly under attack by Catholic conservatives who are using the proposed final rule to spread anti-Obama sentiment to lay Catholics,” said Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life. "The administration has no intention of forcing Catholic institutions to provide insurance coverage for services that are directly in opposition to their moral beliefs. It does not make any sense from a public policy perspective and it certainly is not smart politically to alienate Catholic voters."
Kristen Day said that in November. Ms. Day has a good heart, a pro-life heart – just like Kathy Dahlkemper – but she, too, has been badly deceived by America’s chief Democrat.
Again, why would that surprise anyone?
All of this makes perfect sense. Barack Obama is, above all, first and foremost, a radical, pro-abortion ideologue. He could care less about the “public policy perspective” and alienating Catholic voters. This is where Obama’s heart is: from public funding of Planned Parenthood to embryo destruction to abortion-inducing pharmaceuticals.
As I write, the latest statement from Kristen Day and Democrats for Life is that they are “deeply disappointed” in the actions of President Obama. They urge Obama to “reconsider.”
spectator.org/archives/2012/02/14/obamas-dupes-the-presidents-pr
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top