M
MindOverMatter2
Guest
Eh…we perceive things subjectively. Our experience is subjective.Maybe that wouldn’t bother you. It would me though… Subjective data is meaningless… All things to one man.
Eh…we perceive things subjectively. Our experience is subjective.Maybe that wouldn’t bother you. It would me though… Subjective data is meaningless… All things to one man.
Perhaps you won’t respond, but I can’t possibly let it end there without adding a couple of observations.You didn’t demonstrate to me that physical reality was not merely an appearance. Thus it is dishonest to then claim that we must think that physical reality is synonymous to reality. Why? The only certain knowledge that we have is our minds. The dishonesty of your position is made clear when earlier you was willing to question the existence of time.
I tell you what, you can stay in your delusion that science is the only method of gaining true knowledge.
You keep chopping and changing to suit yourself.
Please don’t respond to this as i will not be responding.
And no two people’s are the same. Controlled scientific experiments take human individuality as far out of the equation as possible.Eh…we perceive things subjectively. Our experience is subjective.
You really do love to make assumptionsAnd no two people’s are the same. Controlled scientific experiments take human individuality as far out of the equation as possible.
Errrr wwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelllllllllllllllllllll 1, 2!Is there any evidence for times existence? Any repeatable experiements?
Ahhh and here we see YOUR ignorance for EVERY good academic appreciates that they should always put there point across in the most understandable manner. Every wannabe tit talks in big words to try to disguise their ignorance.Ok, what did I say then?
At least I have the humility not to pretend I can learn doctorate science from Google.![]()
there are logical proofs for god.
.
What?The creator of this thread is just “trolling”. He is merely rehashing the sophomoric arguments of richard dawkins in “the God delusion”. i’ve read some of his other posts and he is just parroting him (richard) verbatim. so much for “free thought” in secular culture.
That is not an assumption. Even identical twins do not have precisely the same experiences. No two human beings are indentical.You really do love to make assumptions![]()
Don’t worry overmuch about that. This entire thread is a fair approximation of irrelevant drivel (IMO of course). The only “points” made are imaginary “I’m smarter than you” scores notched, in whatever passes in them for their own minds, by the only two guys dueling here.…If that’s all you have to add to this, I’d also suggest you have a think about which one of us is the troll, since this drivel does nothing to address any points made by anyone.
And you can imagine how much that will bother any of the people duelling on this thread, so why don’t you push off?(IMO of course)
I wouldn’t dream of pretending to know that…if science suggests that “nothing” can not actually exist, does that mean it presents the argument that time has always existed as well?
was there ever a time without time?
never mind there was a starting point for time. if time was a constant than special and general relativity wouldn’t work.I wouldn’t dream of pretending to know that…
Einstein is an effing geniusI believe in Spinoza’s God who reveals himself in the** orderly harmony of what exists**, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings.
So, General and Special Relativity work, therefore God exists.never mind there was a starting point for time. if time was a constant than special and general relativity wouldn’t work.