What is Islam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shamsery
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
manx:
Hi Fatuma,

Are you saying that Jesus Christ was only sent for the Jews? Can you prove this please ?

Thanks,

manx
Hey Manx

I have a book that talks about this…i’ll paste things here from it and maybe you can go through and explain how you would understand them.

These 12 Jesuus sent out with the following instructoins: "Go nowhere among the Gentiles, and enter no town of the Samaritans, but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel… (Matthew 10:5-6)

The author mentions how this account is found in Mark 6:6b-13 and Luke 9:1-6 but the restriction is left out… (why is that?)

In Mathew 15:21-28…Jesus intitally refused to heal a woman’s daughter…saying “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel”

It is only after the extreme statemnt of faith attributed to the grieving mother that Jesus made an exception.

He goes through many other verses…I can type them later if the above is not sufficient.
 
greetings.
40.png
RyanL:
“From what you remember”?!? This is the poorest scholarship I have ever seen brought to the table. You’re making a claim without any evidence based off of what you may or may not be recalling correctly. Bring a reliable source, or don’t bring up hogwash like this. Should I mention that Muhammad being the author of the Qur’an is being questioned, from what I remember?
first of all, i’m not claiming any type of scholarship at all. i never claimed to be learned in the intricacies of the christian faith or religion - even though i used to be one. my statement means i’m not entirely sure where i read/heard this from, but that i do remember hearing/reading about it. what i remember is seeing a documentary on the topic years ago (most likely something from a&e or some other medium like that), what the title of the documentary was, or who produced it i cannot recall, hence my statement, “from what i remember”.

as for evidence to base “my claims” off of, the simple fact that only their first names are known and nothing else, is a clear indication of their identities aren’t crystal clear and cannot be verified with certainty. since when is a person’s first name ever sufficient to identify a person? (even with jesus, there are two men with this name in the bible - i.e., jesus barabbas).

a quick search on google (which isn’t the most reliable source for finding information) for “identities of matthew mark luke john” gives the following results:
google.ca/search?hl=fr&q=identities+of+matthew%2C+mark%2C+luke+and+john&meta=

and this article pops up as being one that is directly connected with this issue of who these 4 men were:
mystae.com/reflections/messiah/riddle.html

if you want to clear up any doubts i and others may have regarding the identity of these 4 “unknown” authors, please feel free to provide some verifiable information regarding who they really were. 👍 .
40.png
RyanL:
Jesus didn’t come to write a book. Jesus came to start a Church, and that Church has survived for 2000 years without contradicting herself on a binding matter of faith or morals for two millinia. This Church has bought billions of people to Jesus, and has taught the Good News that Jesus is God and salvation was won for us on the cross that day at Calvary - that is the Injil! That is the Gospel!!
muslims don’t believe jesus came to write a book either. as for what the Injeel is, the Injeel is the book that is mentioned in the Quran as being revealed to jesus. Allah says in the Quran, “and He will teach him (i.e., jesus) the Book, the Wisdom, the Tawrah and the Injeel.” (3:48). and, “and We followed up their signs with jesus, son of mary, confirming what was before them of the Torah and We gave him the Injeel containing guidance and light, confirming what was before them of the Torah, a guidance and admonition for the God-fearing.” (5:46). and, “then Allah said: o jesus son of mary, remember My favour upon you and upon your mother, when I aided you with the holy spirit (i.e., angel gabriel), you spoketo the people in the cradle and in maturity, and when I taught you the Book, the Wisdom, the Tawrah and the Injeel…” (5:110). and there are many more verses from the Quran indicating that the Injeel was a book revealed to jesus by Allah.
40.png
RyanL:
Jesus was “revealed a book”?!? What evidence do you have for this? Is that in any historical testimony prior to a guy in a cave some 600 years and 1000 miles removed popped up and claimed to know the “real Jesus”? Was Elija revealed a book? Daniel? Adam? Elisha? Isaiah? They were all prophets; please tell us if *they *were all revealed a book, or if this was particular to Moses, Muhamad, Jesus, and Joseph Smith. Furthermore, if they were all “revealed a book”, and that book was “the word of God” which cannot be changed…why is it that you believe they were ALL changed?
yes, revealed a book. and our evidence is posted above in the verses i quoted from the Quran. as for your other questions…
  • historical evidence… don’t know. never really bothered to look into it. the Quran is all the evidence i personally need as for me, knowing that it is Allah’s speech and revelation is sufficent. remember? this is a sub-forum about islam, and this thread is about what islam is. :rolleyes:
  • other prophets receiving books, no. not all prophets received books. some did, some didn’t. there is a distinction made between prophets and messengers. all messengers were prophets, but not all prophets were messengers. as for the prophets who received books and what those books were, we are only given knowledge of the books Allah has mentioned; and these are 5: the Quran (revealed to muhammad), the Injeel (revealed to jesus), the Tawrah (revealed to moses) and the Zaboor (revealed to david).
  • other revealed books being changed, only the Tawrah is mentioned in the Quran as being altered and corrupted. as for the Injeel, as i mentioned above, it’s not in the bible. you believe it is, good for you 👍 .
  • jesus being a failure, who told you muslims believe that? :confused:
 
40.png
Faith101:
In Mathew 15:21-28…Jesus intitally refused to heal a woman’s daughter…saying “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel”

It is only after the extreme statemnt of faith attributed to the grieving mother that Jesus made an exception. [bold added]
Faith101,

Could you please tell me a few things based on your reading of Matthew?
  1. Did Jesus make an exception? (You already answered, but I would like you to say it again…)
  2. Does an exception negate the ***absolute maxim ** *that "Jesus was sent **only **to the Jews?
  3. If Jesus made this exception, could others have been made (namely, the whole planet after Jesus’ resurrection)?
  4. Could you please fill in the blank in the following *chronological *list of events:
  • God made a Covenant pact with Adam and Eve: A Couple
  • God made a Covenant pact with Noah: A Family
  • God made a Covenant pact with Abraham: A Tribe
  • God made a Covenant pact with David: A Kingdom
  • God made a Covenant pact through Jesus: The Whole ______ (HINT: Rhymes with “-orld”).
If you need help filling in the blank, read this:
envoymagazine.com/backissues/1.1/allscripture.html

Shalom,
RyanL
 
40.png
r.gonzales:
first of all, i’m not claiming any type of scholarship at all.
This is exactly what you are claiming when you suggest that it has been conclusively shown by anyone that the Gospel authors weren’t who they have been claimed to be for the last 2000 years.
40.png
r.gonzales:
i never claimed to be learned in the intricacies of the christian faith or religion - even though i used to be one
…perhaps you weren’t really a Christian? If you weren’t educated in your faith, if you did not have a personal relationship with Jesus, if you did not practice your faith, if you did not understand what and why you were doing what you were doing, you have little reason to claim that you were a Christian. You have professed that you did not learn your Christian faith - I assert that you never truly were a Christian. A bold statement, I’m sure, but one cannot walk from the Light to the darkness and then proclaim “I can see better!”.
40.png
r.gonzales:
my statement means i’m not entirely sure where i read/heard this from, but that i do remember hearing/reading about it. w…most likely something from a&e…
Then don’t try to pass this off as serious scholarly work. Pass it off as pure and unadulterated speculation based on a second hand and vaguely remembered information that you got from the T.V. Don’t try and make this any more than what it is.
40.png
r.gonzales:
as for evidence to base “my claims” off of, the simple fact that only their first names are known and nothing else, is a clear indication of their identities aren’t crystal clear and cannot be verified with certainty. since when is a person’s first name ever sufficient to identify a person? …
Fine. Matthew Goldberg, Mark Smith, Luke Jenkins, and John Millard. Does that make it “more reliable”?!? Perhaps if we identified Matthew and John as Apostles, and Mark and Luke as students of the Apostles Peter and Paul, in communion with John, James, Andrew, Philip, etc, that give you a better indication of who they are? Kinda’ like when we say Jesus the Christ, or Mary the Mother of God, or the Apostle Matthew, you know exactly who we’re speaking about. I’m sure you’re right, though - we have to have “last names” in order to “know” who they are… :nope:
40.png
r.gonzales:
a quick search on google (which isn’t the most reliable source for finding information) for “identities of matthew mark luke john” gives the following results…please feel free to provide some verifiable information regarding who they really were. 👍 .
Gonna’ have to do a little better than that. Go to www.earlychristianwritings.com and take a look at the dating of the texts you see. Perhaps you should try reading the following:
earlychristianwritings.com/text/didache-roberts.html
The Didache was written between 50-120 AD. People who walked and talked with Jesus and the Apostles were there to read this, and no rebuke was ever given. This is remarkably similar to what the Catholic Church teaches, nearly 2000 years removed…any explaination?
Say…when was the first biography of Muhammad written?
40.png
r.gonzales:
muslims don’t believe jesus came to write a book either. as for what the Injeel is, the Injeel is the book that is mentioned in the Quran as being revealed to jesus. Allah says in the Quran,…[Qur’an quoted]… and there are many more verses from the Quran indicating that the Injeel was a book revealed to jesus by Allah.
That’s nice. Again, Joseph Smith has some claims about the “real Jesus” as well…why would I believe him? Why should I give Muhammad any more credibility than Joseph Smith? After all…they both talked to angels and received texts straight from God…:hmmm:
Also, you’re wrong about the Injeel being a book. The Gospel, quite literally, means “Good News”. The Good News isn’t a book - it’s a person. And His name is Jesus Christ. Research the meaning of the word Gospel, and see that I am correct.
 
40.png
r.gonzales:
  • historical evidence… don’t know. never really bothered to look into it.
:bigyikes::bigyikes:
You left Jesus for something you didn’t even bother to look into?!?
:bigyikes::bigyikes:
40.png
r.gonzales:
the Quran is all the evidence i personally need as for me, knowing that it is Allah’s speech and revelation is sufficent. remember? this is a sub-forum about islam, and this thread is about what islam is.
That’s great that you are content to not research any of the claims of your religion, but “remember that this is a sub-forum about islam” on a CATHOLIC SITE!!
40.png
r.gonzales:
other revealed books being changed, only the Tawrah is mentioned in the Quran as being altered and corrupted. as for the Injeel, as i mentioned above, it’s not in the bible. you believe it is, good for you 👍 .
Why did David never mention that God revealed a book to him? Again, what evidence do you have AT ANY TIME BEFORE MUHAMMAD that supports your claim?!? WHY SHOULD WE BELIEVE THIS?!?
40.png
r.gonzales:
jesus being a failure, who told you muslims believe that? :confused:
Jesus’ job, according to Muslims, was to lead people to worship of the “One True God”, who is not Trinity. Because of what Jesus said and taught, one third of the planet believes that God is Trinity and Jesus is God. If the “greatness” of a prophet is to be judged by how effective they were at transmitting their message…how could Jesus not be considered a failure?!?

RyanL
 
40.png
RyanL:
This is exactly what you are claiming when you suggest that it has been conclusively shown by anyone that the Gospel authors weren’t who they have been claimed to be for the last 2000 years.
where did i say that anything was conclusivly shown? its a fact that their identities are debated over. you claim to know who they were and what authority they had to author those gospels… the burden of proof is upon the claimant. ante up 😉 . i’d like to see your conclusive evidence of who these men were. who were they?
40.png
RyanL:
…perhaps you weren’t really a Christian? If you weren’t educated in your faith, if you did not have a personal relationship with Jesus, if you did not practice your faith, if you did not understand what and why you were doing what you were doing, you have little reason to claim that you were a Christian. You have professed that you did not learn your Christian faith - I assert that you never truly were a Christian.
ah, the old “maybe you weren’t really christian” deal… anyone who is baptised into christianity, believes in its foundations and ascribes themselves to it is a christian as far as i’m concerned. not every adherent to a faith must have scholarly knowledge of it to be considered a true adherent. there are commoners to every religion. the fact that they aren’t as well grounded in the faith as others who ascribe to it doesn’t make them any less “whatever” - whether it be muslim, christian or otherwise.

as for what you assert, i could care less. you don’t consider that i was ever truly christian, good for you 👍 . ain’t no sweat off my sack. i’m muslim now. i’m not here to debate my past. i’m here to try help clear up misconceptions about my chosen faith and religion.
40.png
RyanL:
Then don’t try to pass this off as serious scholarly work. Pass it off as pure and unadulterated speculation based on a second hand and vaguely remembered information that you got from the T.V. Don’t try and make this any more than what it is.
sure, if you say so… :rolleyes: .
40.png
RyanL:
Fine. Matthew Goldberg, Mark Smith, Luke Jenkins, and John Millard. Does that make it “more reliable”?!? Perhaps if we identified Matthew and John as Apostles, and Mark and Luke as students of the Apostles Peter and Paul, in communion with John, James, Andrew, Philip, etc, that give you a better indication of who they are? Kinda’ like when we say Jesus the Christ, or Mary the Mother of God, or the Apostle Matthew, you know exactly who we’re speaking about.
those weren’t their names now were they? as for your assertion that i know who you’re speaking about, no i don’t. why don’t you tell me? (and do so in another thread, since this thread is about what islam is, not about who these 4 mystery authors were).
40.png
RyanL:
Gonna’ have to do a little better than that. Go to www.earlychristianwritings.com and take a look at the dating of the texts you see. Perhaps you should try reading the following:
earlychristianwritings.com/text/didache-roberts.html
The Didache was written between 50-120 AD. People who walked and talked with Jesus and the Apostles were there to read this, and no rebuke was ever given. This is remarkably similar to what the Catholic Church teaches, nearly 2000 years removed…any explaination?
Say…when was the first biography of Muhammad written?
thanks for the links. i’ll check them out when i have some time… however, how are dates going to tell me with the identities of the 4 authors of the gospels? :confused: .

as for your question about prophet muhammad’s first biography, it’s said that ibn ishaaq was the first to write a full bio of prophet muhammad. he lived approximately from 707-773 c.e. prophet muhammad died during the 630s. you do the math. i should note though, that although ibn ishaaq’s bio is the first full bio of prophet muhammad, there are many narrations about his life that were collected in the books of hadeeth, some of which were compiled during his time, some of which were compiled shortly after his death, and some a little after that.

there are biographies for those who narrated his hadeeths and for those who compiled these narrations into books, complete with lineages and many other tidbits of information to help identify those who helped preserve islam so well. too bad you can’t really say the same about matthew, mark, luke and john huh?
40.png
RyanL:
That’s nice. Again, Joseph Smith has some claims about the “real Jesus” as well…why would I believe him? Why should I give Muhammad any more credibility than Joseph Smith? After all…they both talked to angels and received texts straight from God…:hmmm:
the books they say were revealed to them speak for themselves, which is all i really have to say. one exposes one as a false prophet and a liar whereas the other stands as a miracle from Allah, proving muhammad’s prophethood and messengership. and to compare one to the other is nothing but a joke.
40.png
RyanL:
Also, you’re wrong about the Injeel being a book.
if you want to believe that, feel free to do so. like i said about the “real christian” thing, ain’t no sweat off my sack.
 
You left Jesus for something you didn’t even bother to look into?!?
:bigyikes::bigyikes:
[/quote]

i left christianity and turned to the true religion of jesus - the worship of one God alone without ascribing any partners or equals to His divinty. i left christianity because of the doctrine you call the trinity and the fact that it makes no sense whatsoever. i also left christianity because of the belief that “god” died on the cross. my God is living and never dies.
40.png
RyanL:
That’s great that you are content to not research any of the claims of your religion, but “remember that this is a sub-forum about islam” on a CATHOLIC SITE!!
who said anything about being content to not research any of the claims of my chosen religion? i research things everyday. i’ve researched until i was convinced that the Quran was Allah’s speech. and as i said, that was sufficient for me. and i’d take His word over yours any day.

as for this being a catholic site, yes, it is. but that still doesn’t change the fact that this is a sub-forum about my religion and a thread about what it is all about. you guys want to discuss my religion’s beliefs, i have the right to post up what my religion’s beliefs are and try to clear up any misconceptions you non-muslims have about them.
40.png
RyanL:
Why did David never mention that God revealed a book to him? Again, what evidence do you have AT ANY TIME BEFORE MUHAMMAD that supports your claim?!? WHY SHOULD WE BELIEVE THIS?!?
how’s this for a proposal? if we meet prophet david on the day of judgement, let’s go and ask him. sound good to you?

by the way, isn’t the book of psalms supposed to be contained in your bible?
40.png
RyanL:
Jesus’ job, according to Muslims, was to lead people to worship of the “One True God”, who is not Trinity. Because of what Jesus said and taught, one third of the planet believes that God is Trinity and Jesus is God. If the “greatness” of a prophet is to be judged by how effective they were at transmitting their message…how could Jesus not be considered a failure?!?
no, actually, muslims believe that jesus was sent to call the children of israel to the worship of Allah alone, without ascribing any partners or equals with Him in their worship of Him. he called them to obey Allah and to fear Him. it is only upon the prophets and messengers to convey the message, whether their people accept what they have to say or not is not upon them. so as long as they’ve conveyed what they were instructed to do clearly and sufficiently, they’ve succeeded in their mission - even if the majority of their followers don’t take heed of their warnings. are you now going to suggest that moses failed in calling pharoah? or that noah failed in calling his people, after all, the vast majority of them disbelieved and were destroyed in the flood?
 
40.png
Booklover:
Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah!:sleep:
I am just curious to know…as you are a worshipper of God, what do you find about the following verse that Fatuma posted to be “blah blah blah”…

He is God; there is no god but He. He is the Knower of the unseen and the visible; He is the All-Merciful, the All-Compassionate. He is God; there is no god but He. He is the King, the All-Holy, the All-Peace, the Guardian of the Faith, the All-Preserver, the All-Mighty, the All-Compeller, the All-Sublime. Glory be to God, above that they associate! He is God, the Creator, the Maker, the Shaper. To Him belong the Names Most Beautiful. All that is in the heavens and the earth magnifies Him; He is the Almighty, the All-Wise. (59:22-24)
 
40.png
r.gonzales:
where did i say that anything was conclusivly shown? its a fact that their identities are debated over. you claim to know who they were and what authority they had to author those gospels… the burden of proof is upon the claimant. ante up 😉 . i’d like to see your conclusive evidence of who these men were. who were they?
You’re really being a douche about this. The authorship of the Gospels is more authoritatively supported than any other ancient document. Let’s look at a few of the arguments:
If the Gospels are anonymous, why is there no other surviving tradition of another author for the Gospels?
** Second-century testimony is unanimous in attributing the four Gospels to the persons that now carry their name. This suggests that they received their titles early; for if they had not, there would have been a great deal of speculation as to who had written them - “a variation of titles would have inevitably risen,” as had happened with the apocryphal gospels. [Thie.EvJ, 15]; see also [Heng.Mark, 82] It is rather harder to believe that the Gospels circulated anonymously for 60 or more years and then someone finally thought to put authors on them – and managed to get the whole church across the Roman Empire to agree!


Why then were such unlikely characters chosen as authors?
** Luke is mentioned a few times by name in the NT, a very obscure personage. Mark was a rotten kid; he abandoned Paul (Acts 15). Matthew was an apostle, but he was also a tax collector - would you pick the IRS man, and an obscure apostle, to author your Gospel? [Wilk.JUF, 28] Only John is a logical choice for a pseudonymous author. The strength of this point is demonstrated in that some will use the excuse that obscure persons were deliberately chosen as authors in order to fool us into thinking that this would mean they were authentic! http://www.tektonics.org/ntdocdef/doh.gif **

How could the early Christian community honor the Gospels as authoritative unless they knew who had written them?
** Even granting such a late date as some critics surmise, it is doubtful that the Gospels could have gotten anywhere unless they were certainly attributable to someone who was recognized as knowing what they were writing about. (On the other hand, I must say that some critics assume a high degree of gullibility in the first-century church!) To this end, Hengel [CarMoo.Int, 66] has argued that the Gospels must have received their titles immediately - not in the second century. For an anonymous author to have penned a Gospel, and have it accepted as from the hand of one of the Quartet or any authoritative person, would have required them to first produce the Gospel, then present it as the work of another; they would have to concoct some story as to how it came peculiarly to be in their possession (“My grandmother knew Matthew and he gave her a copy…I don’t know why she never told our family about it!”); get around the problem of why a work by such a person disappeared or was previously unknown; then get the church at large, first in his area and then throughout the Roman Empire (and would not the claimed discovery of such a document cause a sensation, and controversy?), to accept this work as genuine! Can any critic explain how these logistic difficulties were overcome? I have noted that they do well in waving around generalities, but never get down to the specifics of how Joe Gentile could have managed to pull off such a shebang on the church as a whole. Is there any parallel to this in secular history, where an enormous group at large was bamboozled by (and continued to be bamboozled by) not just one forgery, but four, attributed in a couple of cases to members of an inner circle, in widely separated places and times? And I’ll add that under the “Q/Marcan priority” hypothesis, how is it they suppose that “Matthew” and “Luke” would choose to use an anonymous document as a source? Mark could not be recognized as authoritative until it was known what source it came from; yet if the critics are right, “Mark” was considered authoritative enough to use not by just one, but by two others working independently of one another. (One way around this scenario is to hypothesize Christian “prophets” through whom these works might have been received and recognized; for a response to this, see below.)
 
**At the beginning of the second century, there would have been first-generation Christians alive who recalled the apostles and their teaching, and many more second-generation Christians who would have had information passed directly to them.
** We have early witnesses to the authorship of some of the Gospels. Papias wrote around 110-130, and he surely did not design the authorship of Matthew and Mark on the spur of the moment. That being so, how could anyone have dared to attribute the Gospels to anyone other than the genuine authors with these first- and second-generation witnesses still alive? Believers in the 70s-90s, when critics suppose that the Gospels were authored anonymously, would have known of no works of Matthew and the others; believers after the 90s who descended from this generation and lived into the lifetime of Papias would have had no tradition of such documents.
douche:
i left christianity and turned to the true religion of jesus - the worship of one God alone without ascribing any partners or equals to His divinty. i left christianity because of the doctrine you call the trinity and the fact that it makes no sense whatsoever. i also left christianity because of the belief that “god” died on the cross. my God is living and never dies.
My God conquered death. How about yours? You “left” christianity because you never knew Jesus - plain and simple. If you’ve don’t know Jesus, you’ve got no Jesus. If you’ve got no Jesus, you’re no christian. Plain and simple. And Mack, you don’t know Jesus.
douche:
how’s this for a proposal? if we meet prophet david on the day of judgement, let’s go and ask him. sound good to you?
May you never have to justify your blasphemy to David, much less Jesus. Repent, and come home. Quit being a douche - COME HOME! It’s not too late to be the man Jesus wants you to be!
douche:
no, actually, muslims believe that jesus was sent to call the children of israel to the worship of Allah alone, without ascribing any partners or equals with Him in their worship of Him. he called them to obey Allah and to fear Him. it is only upon the prophets and messengers to convey the message, whether their people accept what they have to say or not is not upon them. so as long as they’ve conveyed what they were instructed to do clearly and sufficiently, they’ve succeeded in their mission - even if the majority of their followers don’t take heed of their warnings. are you now going to suggest that moses failed in calling pharoah? or that noah failed in calling his people, after all, the vast majority of them disbelieved and were destroyed in the flood?
  1. Apparently no one understood His message. According to the Muslims, how could Jesus have transmitted His message if no one understood it?!?
  2. YOU claim that Moses’ whole purpose was to call Pharoah. I claim that Moses had an entirely different role in salvation history. Don’t try and take down my theology with your misconceptions!
douche:
as for what you assert, i could care less. you don’t consider that i was ever truly christian, good for you 👍 . ain’t no sweat off my sack. i’m muslim now. i’m not here to debate my past. i’m here to try help clear up misconceptions about my chosen faith and religion.
If you are thinking that I have treated you poorly by calling you a douche all through this…well…you’re right! Understand that quotes like the one above show me that you are acting like a petulant child; I have treated you the same way I would treat my brother (whom I love dearly!) if he were acting like a child. If you were validly baptized (as you have claimed - which includes not presenting an obstacle like a disbelief in the Trinity), God has left an indullable mark on your soul. If this is the case, you are my separated brother. I hope that I have shocked you into considering what you have said in your posts, and have let you know that even though I may say things that are not-nice, I am rebuking you out of love. God the Father loves you. Jesus loves you. The Holy Spirit loves you. I love you.

Be the man God wants you to be, and put aside childish things!

May God lead you to the fullness of truth, and have mercy on you for your sins (and mercy on me for mine),
RyanL
 
To All:

Lets talk about the topic of this thread and make it meaningful.

Before I start what Islam is, I would like to clear few things:

We all must keep in mind that there is no such thing as Pope in Islam. But there is a Caliphate system which is based on purely Islamic democracy under which the system do authorise learned, pious people for propagation of Islam and as chief of learning centers.

Besides, any person who seeks good enough knwoledge about Islam can do propagation and let other know what islam is.

Ofcourse there are a number of Scholars who are qualified from Islamic Universities/Colleges/Schools and are authorised from those Institution but the real recoginition in the Islamic world one can have is, due to his/her in-depth knowledge of Islam, piety, implementation of law in his/her life, extra-ordinary ability of solving critical issues within the frame-work of Islamic Principle (Ijtiheed) etc.

The world’s oldest and first formal University was an Islamic University, it was established in Egypt more than a thousand years ago. Before that the fist Islamic learning school was established under the very guidance of Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) himself and it was at his Mosque, at Madina Munawwara (now it is in Saudi Arabia), called Assuffah where his companion used to seek knowledge.

In Islam it is an obligation for every male and female to seek knowledge no matter what it takes, and the Prophet (pbuh) has told even if you had to go to China go there and seek it. In those days (1400 years ago) China use to be considered as a very far land from Arabia. By saying this what he meant was to show how important it is to seek knowledge because the religion of Islam is the last version of all the relgions that came before him. The Holy Quran is the Last Testament and its text has to be saved for all times to come.

The very first words of this Final Revelation are very interseting to note when the Archangel Gabriel came to Muhammed (pbuh) to convey the messege from God Almighty, he uttered these verses:

Proclaim! (or read!) in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created-

Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood:

Proclaim! And thy Lord is Most Bountiful,-

He Who taught (the use of) the pen,-

Taught man that which he knew not.
(Holy Quran Surah 96:1-5)

And there are so many instances which shows how important it is to learn and seek knowledge of Islam and every issue and matter of life that is essential to have a good life here and Hereafter. There is nothing to hide from anyone and it’s treasure is for whole mankind. Anybody can seek it, master it and reap the benefit of it.
( In the next post I will begin the formal Introduction )
 
Every religion of the world has been named either after its founder or after the community or nation in which it was born. For instance, Christianity takes its name from its (prophet) Jesus Christ; Buddhism from its founder Gautama Buddha; Zoroastrianism from its founder Zoroaster; and Judaism the religion of the Jews from the name of the tribe Judah (of the country of Judea) where it originated. The same is true of all other religions except Islam, which enjoys the unique distinction of having no such association with any particular person or people or country. Nor is it the product of any human mind. It is a universal religion and its objective is to create and cultivate in man the quality and attitude of Islam.

Islam, in fact, is an attributive title. Anyone who possesses this attribute, whatever race, community, country or group he belongs to, is a Muslim. According to the Qur’an (the Holy Book of the Muslims), among every people and in all ages there have been good and righteous people who possessed this attribute — and all of them were and are Muslims.

Islam — What Does it Mean?

Islam
is an Arabic word and connotes submission, surrender and obedience. As a religion, Islam stands for complete submission and obedience to Allah. Another literal meaning of the word Islam is "peace’ and this signifies that one can achieve real peace of body and mind only through submission and obedience to Allah. Such a life of obedience brings with it peace of the heart and establishes real peace in society at large.

Everyone can see that we live in an orderly universe, where everything is assigned a place in a grand scheme. The moon, the stars and all the heavenly bodies are knit together in a magnificent system. They follow unalterable laws and make not even the slightest deviation from their ordained courses. Similarly, everything in the world, from the minute whirling electron to the mighty nebulae, invariably follows its own laws. Matter, energy and life — all obey their laws and grow and change and live and die in accordance with those laws. Even in the human world the laws of nature are paramount. Man’s birth, growth and life are all regulated by a set of biological laws. He derives sustenance from nature in accordance with an unalterable law. All the organs of his body from the smallest tissues to the heart and the brain, are governed by the laws prescribed for them. In short, ours is a law-governed universe and everything in it is following the course that has been ordained for it.

This powerful, all-pervasive law, which governs all that comprises the universe, from the tiniest specks of dust to the magnificent galaxies of the heavens, is the law of God, the Creator and Ruler of the universe. As the whole of creation obeys the law of God, the whole universe, therefore, literally follows the religion of Islam — for Islam signifies nothing but obedience and submission to Allah, the Lord of the Universe. The sun, the moon, the earth and all other heavenly bodies are thus ‘Muslim’. So are the air, water, heat, stones, trees and animals. Everything in the universe is ‘Muslim’ for it obeys God by submission to His laws. Even a man who refuses to believe in God, or offers his worship to someone other than Allah, has necessarily to be a ‘Muslim’ as far as his existence is concerned.

For his entire life, from the embryonic stage to the body’s dissolution into dust after death, every tissue of his muscles and every limb of his body follow the course prescribed by God’s law. His very tongue, which, on account of his ignorance advocates the denial of God or professes multiple deities, is in its very nature ‘Muslim’. His head which he want only bows to others besides Allah is born ‘Muslim’. His heart, which, through his lack of true knowledge, cherishes love and reverence for others, is ‘Muslim’ by intuition. These are all obedient to the Divine Law, and their functions and movements are governed by the injunctions of that law alone.

contd.2
 
( Please read the previous post first )

Let us now examine the situation from a different angle. Man is so constituted that there are two distinct spheres of his activity. One is the sphere in which he finds himself totally regulated by the Divine Law. Like other creatures, he is completely caught in the grip of the physical laws of nature and is bound to follow them.

But there is another sphere of his activity. He has been endowed with reason and intellect. He has the power to think and form judgments, to choose and reject, to approve and spurn. He is free to adopt whatever course of life he chooses. He can embrace any faith, and live by any ideology he likes. He may prepare his own code of conduct or accept one formulated by others. Unlike other creatures, he has been given freedom of thought, choice and action. In short, man has been bestowed with free will.

Both these aspects co-exist side by side in man’s life.

In the first he, like all other creatures, is a born Muslim, invariably obeying the injunctions of God, and is bound to remain one. As far as the second aspect is concerned, he is free to become or not to become a Muslim. It is the way a person exercises this freedom, which divides mankind into two groups: believers and non-believers. An individual, who chooses to acknowledge his Creator, accepts Him as his real Master, honestly and scrupulously submits to His laws and injunctions and follows the code. He has achieved completeness in his Islam by consciously deciding to obey God in the domain in which he was endowed with freedom of choice. He is a perfect Muslim: his submission of his entire self to the will of Allah is Islam and nothing but Islam.

He has now consciously submitted to Him Whom he had already been unconsciously obeying. He has now willingly offered obedience to the Master Whom he already owed obedience to involuntarily. His knowledge is now real for he has acknowledged the Being Who endowed him with the power to learn and to know. Now his reason and judgement are set on an even keel — for he has rightly decided to obey the Being Who bestowed upon him the faculty of thinking and judging. His tongue is also truthful for it expresses its belief in the Lord who gave it the faculty of speech. Now the whole of his existence is an embodiment of truth for, in all spheres of life, he voluntarily as well as involuntarily obeys the laws of One God — the Lord of the Universe. Now he is at peace with the whole universe for he worships Him Whom the whole universe worships. Such a man is God’s vice-regent on earth. The whole world is for him and he is for God.

contd…3
 
( Please read the previous post first )

The Nature of Disbelief

In contrast to the man described above, there is the man who, although a born Muslim and unconsciously remaining one throughout his life, does not exercise his faculties of reason, intellect and intuition to recognise his Lord and Creator and misuses his freedom of choice by choosing to deny Him. Such a man becomes an unbeliever — in the language of Islam a Kafir.

Kufr literally means ‘to cover’ or ‘to conceal’. The man who denies God is called Kafir (concealer) because he conceals by his disbelief’ what is inherent in his nature and embalmed in his own soul — for his nature is instinctively imbued with Islam’. His whole body functions in obedience to that instinct. Each and every particle of existence — living or lifeless — functions in accordance with Islam’ and is fulfilling the duty that has been assigned to it. But the vision of this man has been blurred, his intellect has been befogged, and he is unable to see the obvious. His own nature has become concealed from his eyes and he thinks and acts in utter disregard of it. Reality becomes estranged from him and he gropes in the dark. Such is the nature of Kufr.

Kufr is a form of ignorance, or, rather, it is ignorance. What ignorance can be greater than to be ignorant of God, the Creator and the Lord of the Universe? A man observes the vast panorama of nature, the superb mechanism that is ceaselessly working, the grand design that is manifest in every aspect of creation — he observes this vast machine, but he does not know anything of its Maker and Director. He knows what a wonderful organism his body is but is unable to comprehend the Force that brought it into existence, the Engineer Who designed and produced it, the Creator Who made the unique living being out of lifeless stuff: carbon, calcium, sodium and the like. He witnesses a superb plan in the universe — but fails to see the Planner behind it. He sees great beauty and harmony in its working — but not the Creator. He observes a wonderful design in nature - but not the Designer! How can a man, who has so blinded himself to reality, approach true knowledge? How can one who has made the wrong beginning reach the right destination? He will fail to find the key to Reality. The Right Path will remain concealed for him and whatever his endeavours in science and arts, he will never be able to attain truth and wisdom. He will be groping in the darkness of ignorance.

Not only that; Kufr is a tyranny, the worst of all tyrannies. And what is ‘tyranny’? It is an unjust use of force or power. It is when you compel a thing to act unjustly or against its true nature, its real will and its inherent attitude.

We have seen that all that is in the universe is obedient to God, the Creator. To obey, to live in accordance with His Will and His Law or (to put it more precisely) lo be a Muslim is ingrained in the nature of things. God has given manpower over these things, but it is incumbent that they should be used for the fulfillment of His Will and not otherwise.
Anyone who disobeys God and resorts to Kufr perpetrates the greatest injustice, for he uses his powers of body and mind to rebel against the course of nature and becomes an instrument in the drama of disobedience. He bows his head before deities other than God and cherishes in his heart the love, reverence and fear of other powers in utter disregard of the instinctive urge of these organs. He uses his own powers and all those things over which he has authority against the explicit Will of God and thus establishes a reign of tyranny.

Can there be any greater injustice, tyranny and cruelty than that exhibited by this man who exploits and misuses everything under the sun and unscrupulously forces them to a course, which affronts nature and justice?

Kufr is not mere tyranny; it is rebellion, ingratitude and infidelity. After all what is the reality of man? Where do his power and authority come from? Is he himself the creator of his mind, his heart, his soul and other organs of his body — or have they been created by God? Has he himself created the universe and all that is in it—or has it been created by God? Who has harnessed all the powers and energies for the service of man — man or God? If everything has been created by God and God alone, then to whom do they belong? Who is their rightful sovereign? It is God and none else. And if God is the Creator, the Master and the Sovereign, then who would be a greater rebel than the man who uses God’s creation against His injunctions — and who makes his mind think against God. harbours in his heart thoughts against Him, and uses his various faculties against the Sovereign’s Will.

contd.4
 
( Please read the previous post first )

If a servant betrays his master you denounce him as faithless. If an officer becomes disloyal to the state you brand him as a traitor and renegade. If a person cheats his benefactor you have no hesitation in condemning him as ungrateful. But such acts cannot begin to compare to the one, which the disbeliever commits by his Kufr. All that a man has and all that he uses for the benefit of others is a gift of God. The greatest obligation that a man owes on this earth is to his parents. But who has implanted the love of children in the parents’ heart? Who endowed the mother with the will and power to nurture, nourish and feed her children? Who inspired the parents with the passion to spend everything in their possession for the well being of their children? A little reflection would reveal that God is the greatest benefactor of man. He is his Creator, Lord, Nourisher, Sustainer, as well as King and Sovereign. So what can be greater betrayal, ingratitude, rebellion and treason than Kufr, through which a man denies and disobeys his real Lord and Sovereign?

Do not think that by committing Kufr man does or can do the least harm to Almighty God. Insignificant speck on the face of a tiny ball in this limitless universe that man is, what harm can he do to the Lord of the Universe Whose dominions are so infinitely vast that we have not yet been able to explore their boundaries even with the help of the most powerful telescope; Whose power is so great that myriads of heavenly bodies, like the Earth, the Moon, the Sun and the stars are, at His bidding, whirling like tiny balls; Whose wealth is so boundless that He is the sole Master of the whole universe: and Who provides for all and needs none to provide for Him? Man’s revolt against Him can do Him no harm: on the other hand, by his disobedience, man treads the path of ruin and disgrace.

The inevitable consequence of this revolt and denial of reality is a failure in the ultimate ideals of life. Such a rebel will never find the thread of real knowledge and vision; for knowledge that fails to reveal its own Creator can reveal no truth. Such a man’s intellect and reason always run astray; for reason which errs about its own Creator cannot illumine the paths of life.

Such a man will meet with failures in all the affairs of his life. His morality, his civic and social life, his struggle for livelihood and his family life, in short, his entire existence, will be unsatisfactory. He will spread confusion and disorder. He will, without the least compunction, shed blood, violate other men’s rights and generally act destructively. His perverted thoughts and ambitions, his blurred vision and distorted scale of values, and his evil activities will make life bitter for him and for all around him.

Such a man destroys the calm and pose of life on earth. And in the life hereafter he will be held guilty for the crimes he committed against his nature. Every organ of his body — his brain, eyes, nose, hands and feet — will complain against the injustice and cruelty he had subjected them to. Every tissue of his being will denounce him before God Who, as the fountain of justice, will punish him as he deserves. This is the inglorious consequence of Kufr. It leads to the blind alleys of utter failure, both here and hereafter.

Contd…5
 
( Please read the previous post first )

The Blessings of Islam

These are the evils and disadvantages of Kufr. Let us now look at some of the blessings of Islam

You find in the world around you and in the small kingdom of your own self-innumerable manifestations of God’s divine power. This grand universe, which ceaselessly works with matchless order and in accordance with unalterable laws, is in itself a witness to the fact that its Designer, Creator and Governor is an Omnipotent, All-Powerful Being with infinite power, knowledge and resources, a Being of perfect wisdom. Whom nothing in the universe dares disobey. It is in the very nature of man, as it is with every other thing in this universe to obey Him Besides endowing man with the capacity to acquire knowledge, the faculty to think and reflect, and the ability to distinguish right from wrong. God has granted him a certain amount of freedom of will and action. In this freedom lies man’s real trial; his knowledge, his wisdom, his power of discrimination and his freedom of will and action are all being tried and tested. Man has not been obliged to adopt any particular course, for by compulsion the very object of the trial would have been defeated. If in an examination you are compelled to write a certain answer to a question, the examination will be of no use. Your merit can be properly judged only if you are allowed to answer the questions freely, according to your own knowledge and understanding. If your answer is correct you will succeed; if it is wrong you will fail, and your failure will bar the way to further progress.

The situation, which man faces, is similar. God has given him freedom of will and action so that he may choose whatever attitude in life he likes and considers proper for himself— Islam or Kufr.

By the correct use of his knowledge and intellect a man recognises his Creator, reposes belief in Him, and, in spite of being under no compulsion to do so, chooses the path of obedience to Him. He understands both his own nature and the laws and realities of nature itself: despite the power and freedom to adopt any course, he adopts the way of obedience and loyalty to God, the Creator. He is successful in his trial because he has used his intellect and all other faculties properly. He uses his eyes to see the reality, his ears to listen to the truth and his mind to form right opinions. He puts all his heart and soul into following the right way he has so chosen. He chooses Truth, sees the reality, and willingly and joyfully submits to his Lord and Master. He is intelligent, truthful and dutiful, for he has chosen light over darkness. Thus he has proved by his conduct that he is not only a seeker after Truth but is its knower and worshipper as well. Such a man is on the right path, and is destined to succeed in this world and in the world to come.

Such a man will always choose the right path in every field of knowledge and action. The man who knows God with all His attributes knows the beginning as well as the ultimate end of reality. He can never be led astray, for his first step is on the right path, and he is sure of the direction and destination of his journey in life. He will reflect on the secrets of the universe, and will try to fathom the mysteries of nature, but he will not lose his way in mazes of doubt and scepticism. His path being illumined with Divine Vision, his every step will be in the right direction. In science he will endeavour to learn the laws of nature and uncover the hidden treasures of the earth for the betterment of humanity. He will try his level best to explore all avenues of knowledge and power and to harness all that exists on earth and in the heavens in the interests of mankind.

Contd…6
 
( Please read the previous post first )

At every stage of his enquiry his God-consciousness will save him from making evil and destructive uses of science and the scientific method. He will never think of himself as the master of all these objects, boasting to be the conqueror of nature, arrogating to himself godly and sovereign powers and nourishing the ambition of subverting the world, subduing the human race and establishing his supremacy over all and sundry by fair means or foul. Such, an attitude of revolt and defiance can never be entertained by a Muslim scientist — only a Kafir scientist can fall prey to such illusions and by submitting to them expose the entire human race to the danger of total destruction and annihilation 2. (2. The situation, which confronts modern man today, is similar. Dr. Joad says: “Science has given us power fit for the gods, and to its use we bring the mentality of schoolboys and savages.” The famous philosopher Bertrand Russell writes: “Broadly speaking, »e are in the middle of a race between human skill as to means and human folly as to ends, every increase in the skill required lo achieve them is to the bad. The human race has survived hitherto owing to ignorance and incompetence: but, given knowledge and competence combined with folly, there can be no certainty of survival. Knowledge is power, but it is power for evil just as much as for good. It follows that unless man increases in wisdom as much as in knowledge, increase of knowledge will be increase of sorrow.” (Impact of Science on Society, pp. 120-121.) Another leading thinker has put the paradox in these words: “We are taught lo fly in the air like birds, and to swim in the water like fishes: but how to lire on the earth we do not know.” (Quoted by Joad in Counter Attack From the East, p. 28.)

A Muslim scientist, on the other hand, will behave in an altogether different way. The deeper his insight into the world of science, the stronger will be his faith in God. His head will bow down before Him in gratitude. His feelings will be that as his Master has blessed him with greater power and knowledge so he must exert himself for his own good and for the good of humanity. Instead of arrogance there will be humility. Instead of power-drunkenness there will be a strong realisation of the need to serve humanity. His freedom will not be unbridled. He will be guided by the tenets of morality and Divine Revelation. Thus science will in his hands, instead of becoming an instrument of destruction, become an agency for human welfare and moral regeneration. And this is the way in which he will express his gratitude to his Master for the gifts and blessings He has bestowed on man.

Similarly, in history, economics, politics, law and other branches of arts and science, a Muslim will nowhere lag behind a Kafir in the fields of inquiry and struggle, but their angles of view and consequently their modus operandi will be widely different. A Muslim will study every branch of knowledge in its true perspective. He will strive to arrive at the right conclusions.

In history he will draw correct lessons from the past experiences of man, and will uncover the true causes of the rise and fall of civilisations. He will try to benefit from all that was good and right in the past and will scrupulously avoid all that led to the decline and fall of nations. In politics his sole objective will be to strive for the establishment of policies where peace, justice, fraternity and goodness reign, where man is a brother of man and respects his humanity, where no exploitation or slavery is rampant, where the rights of the individual are upheld, and where the powers of the state are considered as a sacred trust from God and are used for the common welfare of all. In the field of law, the endeavour of a Muslim will be to make it the true embodiment of justice and the real protector of the rights of all — particularly of the weak. He will see that everybody gets his due share and no injustice or oppression is inflicted on anyone. He will respect the law, make others respect it, and will see that it is administered equitably.

contd…7
 
( Please read the previous post first )

The life of a Muslim will always be filled with godliness, piety, righteousness and truthfulness. He will live in the belief that God alone is the Master of all, that whatever he and other men possess has been given by God, that the powers he wields are only a trust from God, that the freedom he has been endowed with is not to be used indiscriminately, and that it is in his own interest to use it in accordance with God’s Will. He will constantly keep in view that one day he will have to return to the Lord and submit an account of his entire life. The sense of accountability will always remain implanted in his mind and he will never behave irresponsibly.

Think of the moral excellence of the man who lives with this mental attitude — his will be a life of purity and piety and love and altruism. He will be a blessing unto mankind. His thinking will not be polluted with evil thoughts and perverted ambitions. He will abstain from seeing evil, hearing evil, and doing evil. He will guard his tongue and will never utter a word of lie. He will earn his living through just and fair means and will prefer hunger to a food acquired unfairly through exploitation or injustice. He will never be a party to any form of oppression or violation of human life and honour. He will never yield to evil, whatever the cost of defiance. He will be an embodiment of goodness and nobility and will defend right and truth even at the cost of his life. Such a man will be a power to be reckoned with. He is bound to succeed.

He will be highly honoured and respected. How can humiliation ever visit a person who is not prepared to bow his head before anyone except God the Almighty, the Sovereign of the universe? No one can be more powerful than he — for he fears none but God and seeks blessings from none but Him. What power can make him deviate from the right path? What wealth can buy his faith? What force can shape his conscience? What power can compel him to behave, as he does not want to?

He will be the wealthiest. No one in the world can be richer or more independent than he — for he will live a life of austerity and contentment. He will be neither a sensualist, nor indulgent, nor greedy. He will be contented with whatever he earns fairly and honestly and however much ill-gotten wealth is heaped before him he will not even look at it. He will have peace and contentment of heart — and what can be a greater wealth than this?

He will be the most revered, popular and beloved. No one can be more lovable than he — for he lives a life of charity and benevolence. He will be just to everyone, discharge his duties honestly, and work for the good of others. People’s hearts will be naturally drawn towards him.

No one can be more trust worthy than he — for he will not betray his trust, nor will he stray from righteousness: he will be true to his word, and straightforward and honest in his dealings. He will be fair and just in all his affairs, for he is sure that God is ever-present, ever vigilant. Words fail to describe the credit and good will, which such a man commands. Can there be anyone who will not trust him? Such is the life and character of a Muslim.

If you understand the true character of a Muslim, you will be convinced that he cannot live in humiliation, abasement or subjugation. He is bound to prevail and no power on earth can overwhelm him. For Islam, inculcates in him the qualities, which cannot be driven out.

And after living a respectable and honourable life on this earth, he will return to his Creator Who will shower on him the choicest of His blessings — for he will have discharged his duty ably, fulfilled his mission successfully and emerged from his trial triumphantly. He is successful in life in this world and in the hereafter will live in eternal peace, joy and bliss.

This is Islam, the natural religion of man, the religion that is not associated with any person, people, period or place. It is the way of nature, the religion of man. In every age, in every country and among every people, all God-knowing and truth-loving men have believed and lived this very religion. They were all Muslims, irrespective of whether they called that way Islam. Whatever its name was, it signified Islam and nothing but Islam.

cond…8
 
  • ( Please read the previous post first ) *
Islam means obedience to God. And it is common sense that this obedience cannot be complete unless man knows certain basic facts of life and places firm faith in them. What are those facts? And what are the essentials, which a man must know to fashion his life in accordance with the Divine Way? This we propose to discuss in the present chapter.

First of all, one should have an unshakable belief in the existence of God; without this, obedience to Him is clearly impossible.

Then, one must know the attributes of God. It is the knowledge of the attributes of God, which enables man to cultivate the noblest of human qualities and to fashion his life in virtue and godliness. If a man does not know that there is One and only One God who is the Creator, the Ruler and the Sustainer of the Universe and there is none else to share with Him even a shred of Divine power and authority, he may fall prey to false gods, and offer his homage to them in search of favours.

But if he knows the divine attribute of tawhid (Oneness of God), there is no possibility of this. Similarly, if a man knows that God is Omnipresent and Omniscient and sees, hears and knows everything that we do in public or private — including our unexpressed thoughts! — Then how can he afford to be disobedient to God? He will feel that he is under eternal vigil and will, therefore, behave accordingly. But he who is not aware of these attributes of God may be led, because of his ignorance, into disobedience. It is the same with all the other attributes of God.

The fact is that the qualities and attributes which a man must possess, if he wants to pursue the way of Islam, can be cultivated and developed only out of profound knowledge of the attributes of God. It is the knowledge of God’s attributes, which purifies a man’s mind and soul, his beliefs, morals and actions. And a mere cursory acquaintance with or just an academic knowledge of these attributes is not sufficient — there must be an unflinching conviction firmly rooted in the mind and heart of man so that he may remain immune from insidious doubts and perversions.

Moreover, one must know in detail the way of living by following which one can seek the pleasure of God. Unless a man knows the likes and dislikes of God, how can he choose the one and reject the other? If a man has no knowledge of the Divine Law, how can he follow it? Thus knowledge of the Divine Law and the Revealed Code of Life is essential.

But here, again, mere knowledge is not enough. Man must have full confidence and conviction that it is the Divine Law and that his salvation lies in following this code alone. For knowledge without this conviction will fail to spur man to the Right Path and he may be lost in the blind alley of disobedience.

Finally, man must also know the consequences both of belief and obedience and of disbelief and disobedience. He must know what blessings will be showered upon him if he chooses God’s way and leads a life of purity, virtue and obedience. And he must also know what consequences follow if he adopts the way of disobedience and revolt. Thus, knowledge of life after death is absolutely essential for this purpose. Man must have an unwavering belief in the fact that death does not mean the end of life; that there will be resurrection and he will be brought to the highest court of justice, to be presided over by God Himself; that on the Day of Judgement complete justice will prevail; and that good deeds will be rewarded and misdeeds punished. Everybody will get his due; there will be no escape. This is bound to happen. A sense of accountability is essential for fully-fledged obedience to the Law of God.

A man who has no knowledge of the world to come many considers obedience and disobedience quite immaterial. He may think that the obedient and the disobedient will both meet a similar end: after death, both will be reduced to mere dust. With this attitude of mind, how can he be expected to submit to all the inconveniences and troubles that are inextricably associated with the life of active obedience, and avoid committing those sins which do not apparently bring him any moral or material loss in this world? With this mental attitude a man cannot acknowledge and submit to God’s Law.

Nor can a man, who lacks firm belief in the life hereafter and in the Divine Court of Judgement, remain steadfast in the turbulent waters of life with its temptation to sin, crime and evil; for doubt and hesitancy rob a man of his will to action. You can remain consistent in your behaviour only if you are firm in your beliefs. You can whole-heartedly follow a course only if you are sure of the benefits that will accrue to you by following it and of the losses that will engulf you if you disobey it. Thus, a profound knowledge of the consequences of belief and disbelief and of the life after death is crucial.

These are the essential facts, which one must know if one wants to live the life of obedience, that is, Islam.

contd…9
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top