What is the Book of Revelation about?

  • Thread starter Thread starter green889
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

green889

Guest
I have heard some people including Michael Voris and Scott Hahn that the Book of Revelation is about the Catholic Mass. I am reading a book called The Apocalypse: Letter by Letter and it was written by a Catholic but his interpretation which he gives a good argument for is more in line of an apocalyptic future event than a resemblance to the Catholic mass. Does the Church have any official teaching on the Book of Revelation?
 
The Church doesn’t have any official interpretation of the Book of Revelation because it’s not necessary. It does teach that certain approaches to its interpretation, such as millennialism, are not compatible with Catholic teaching.

Revelation was written to reveal the risen Christ’s message, encourage the early Church under persecution, and to admonish those who were beginning to stray. It contains many visions, which involve scenes of the heavenly kingdom, which is where Scott Hahn draws his interpretation of the Mass, which is perfectly in line with Catholic teaching.
 
I have heard some people including Michael Voris and Scott Hahn that the Book of Revelation is about the Catholic Mass. I am reading a book called The Apocalypse: Letter by Letter and it was written by a Catholic but his interpretation which he gives a good argument for is more in line of an apocalyptic future event than a resemblance to the Catholic mass. Does the Church have any official teaching on the Book of Revelation?
The Book of Revelations contains several different parts, each with it’s own purpose. In the beginning of the book, you have John receiving messages for the church in the major cities of the time (i.e. Ephesis, etc) from Christ. Then it moves into John at the Heavenly Mass which is just like the one we celebrate each time we celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass here on earth. It then moves into, what was for St. John, a prophesy of the fall of Jerusalem (the Whore of Babylon) in 70 AD when Rome completely destroyed the city, including the temple. The book ends with a glimps of the last days when Christ comes again to claim his bride. Remember, He only returns once!!!

The Book of Revelations is an interesting book. One just needs to remember that one vision may represent more than one event. It is not a completely prophetic book nor is it totally about the Mass.
 
Hi Green,

Revelation is about the struggle beltween good and evil and the ultimate victory of good. Like many prophecies, it can be interpreted on several levels : Christianity against paganism (at the time it was written), the Church against the Devil (presently)and the final struggle at the end of the world. Concurrently, you can apply it to the struggle within yourself

Verbum
 
I would recommend you all read the book The Apocalypse: Letter by Letter by Steven Paul. I haven’t finished it yet but it is pretty interesting so far and makes a compelling case for the Book of Revelation as being an apocalyptic book and the writer is Catholic. One thing though, did John who wrote the book write it when Nero was in power or was it someone else? He quotes a Church Father in reference to when John wrote the Book of Revelation but I have to double check it to make sure I’m get the Church Father and date correct.
 
I have heard some people including Michael Voris and Scott Hahn that the Book of Revelation is about the Catholic Mass. I am reading a book called The Apocalypse: Letter by Letter and it was written by a Catholic but his interpretation which he gives a good argument for is more in line of an apocalyptic future event than a resemblance to the Catholic mass. Does the Church have any official teaching on the Book of Revelation?

**It’s a Christian apocalypse - so the short answer is, that it is about the coming of the Kingship of God & the destruction of the devil & of all forces contrary to God as revealed in Christ. **​

**The same themes are present in the other NT books, especially the four gospels. This book is more obviously apocalyptic, but they two have apocalypses or apocalyptic themes in them. **
 
One thing though, did John who wrote the book write it when Nero was in power or was it someone else? He quotes a Church Father in reference to when John wrote the Book of Revelation but I have to double check it to make sure I’m get the Church Father and date correct.
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia,St. Irenaeus, St. Jerome and Eusebius all give the date as during the reign of Domitian, with Eusebius and Jerome giving it as the 14th year of that reign (95-96, the usual date). Some place the date during the reign of Nero in 68, though that seems unlikely and unattested (as far as I know) by Church fathers.
 
I have heard some people including Michael Voris and Scott Hahn that the Book of Revelation is about the Catholic Mass. I am reading a book called The Apocalypse: Letter by Letter and it was written by a Catholic but his interpretation which he gives a good argument for is more in line of an apocalyptic future event than a resemblance to the Catholic mass. Does the Church have any official teaching on the Book of Revelation?
You can interpret it as being about the Mass if you want to, but you don’t have to as a Catholic. As a Catholic there are any number of interpretations that are acceptable.
 
…a dream, no more and no less… any interpreting, leave that up to the church… we certainly are not qualified…IMHO 👍
 
I have heard some people including Michael Voris and Scott Hahn that the Book of Revelation is about the Catholic Mass. I am reading a book called The Apocalypse: Letter by Letter and it was written by a Catholic but his interpretation which he gives a good argument for is more in line of an apocalyptic future event than a resemblance to the Catholic mass. Does the Church have any official teaching on the Book of Revelation?
What is the Book of Revelation about? The answer is found in the very first verse of the very first chapter:

“The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John.”

The Book of Revelation is about “things which will shortly come to pass.” It is a prophecy of what will happen in the future!

There are other things we can learn from that first verse. The Book of Revelation is the revelation of Jesus Christ. This revelation came from God the Father. It is to be given to John. For what purpose? “To SHOW unto his servants things which will shortly come to pass.”

The Book of Revelation will reveal to God’s servants what will happen in the future. Obviously, then, those who do not have an understanding of the Revelation could not be God’s servants.
 
What is the Book of Revelation about? The answer is found in the very first verse of the very first chapter:

“The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified [it] by his angel unto his servant John.”

The Book of Revelation is about “things which will shortly come to pass.” It is a prophecy of what will happen in the future!

There are other things we can learn from that first verse. The Book of Revelation is the revelation of Jesus Christ. This revelation came from God the Father. It is to be given to John. For what purpose? “To SHOW unto his servants things which will shortly come to pass.”
The key here is “shortly come to pass”. Any attempts to shoehorn it’s mystical visions into things happening in our day are misguided and not to be trusted.
The Book of Revelation will reveal to God’s servants what will happen in the future. Obviously, then, those who do not have an understanding of the Revelation could not be God’s servants.
I’d be careful making such a bold and sweeping statement about who are the servants of God. You implication is that you know who they are and who they aren’t. Only God knows for certain which individuals are truly his servants. And as to understanding the Revelation of Jesus Christ, who better than the Church he himself established, to whom he promised the guidance of the Holy Spirit and entrusted the commission of preaching to all creatures?
 
You also have to remember that the Book of Revelations was written for first century Christians which does not mean that it doesn’t have applications to us now.
 
You also have to remember that the Book of Revelations was written for first century Christians which does not mean that it doesn’t have applications to us now.
Of course, all Scripture has applications for us now or it wouldn’t be Scripture, yes? 😉

I’m just trying to stave off the notion that all one has to do is read Revelation to come up with one’s own interpretation of its meaning vis a vis the end times and all that. A lot of very well meaning but misguided people think that because they believe themselves to be “spirit led” they can do that.
 
The key here is “shortly come to pass”. Any attempts to shoehorn it’s mystical visions into things happening in our day are misguided and not to be trusted.
The Book of Revelation is about prophecies of things which must happen in the future – PERIOD. That is what I said the Book of Revelation is all about. I never said anything about these things already happening in our day. Please do not color my statement to say something it doesn’t. Do you agree with me that the Book of Revelation is a prophecy of things which must happen in the future?

You are saying that attempts to interpret the prophecy as already happening in our day are misguided and not to be trusted. What do you think about attempts to interpret the prophecy as having already happened years ago? Would those be misguided as well and not to be trusted?
I’d be careful making such a bold and sweeping statement about who are the servants of God. You implication is that you know who they are and who they aren’t. Only God knows for certain which individuals are truly his servants. And as to understanding the Revelation of Jesus Christ, who better than the Church he himself established, to whom he promised the guidance of the Holy Spirit and entrusted the commission of preaching to all creatures?
Whether there was such an implication or not is irrelevant. The point is this: If God’s purpose for His Revelation is to show to His servants things which must happen in the future, could His servants be those who have no understanding of that Revelation? Of course, not! How could God SHOW what must happen in the future if His Revelation is not understood?

Ergo, His servants must be those who understand His Revelation!

And you are right, the Church Jesus established have that understanding and is the one entrusted with the commission of preaching to all creatures. If then we see a church that admits to having no understanding of the Book of Revelation and so is not preaching the prophecies contained in that book, we can be sure that that church IS NOT the one established by Christ.
 
The Book of Revelation is about prophecies of things which must happen in the future – PERIOD. That is what I said the Book of Revelation is all about. I never said anything about these things already happening in our day. Please do not color my statement to say something it doesn’t. Do you agree with me that the Book of Revelation is a prophecy of things which must happen in the future?
I’m sorry, I didn’t at all mean what you are saying here, hence the misunderstanding. By “our day” I mean just what you do–predicting the future in our day. Sorry about the misunderstanding. 🙂
You are saying that attempts to interpret the prophecy as already happening in our day are misguided and not to be trusted. What do you think about attempts to interpret the prophecy as having already happened years ago? Would those be misguided as well and not to be trusted?
The attempts to interpret the prophecy for the days in which it was written are easy because we can see the historical outcome of what St. John was writing about. I’m afraid, once again, I’ve miscommunicated something here, for which I take all the blame.
Whether there was such an implication or not is irrelevant. The point is this: If God’s purpose for His Revelation is to show to His servants things which must happen in the future, could His servants be those who have no understanding of that Revelation? Of course, not! How could God SHOW what must happen in the future if His Revelation is not understood?
Ergo, His servants must be those who understand His Revelation!
I’m afraid you have the wrong end of the stick with this. There is no “future interpretation” left to be interpreted. The things St. John wrote about have already come to pass, just as he said they would. You no doubt have been told otherwise, and have sat at the feet of those who say they know what the yet-to-be-fulfilled prophecies are, but they are only going according to a system devised for doing so that was completely foreign to the early Church. There is no “thousand year reign” yet to happen or any “secret rapture” and so on. It’s all made up out of thin air by well-meaning but misguided souls trying to figure out what does not need to be figured out. Why? Because Jesus said we wouldn’t know the day or the hour of his return–only signs of it. And those signs aren’t scattered throughout the Bible like some secret code one has to decipher in order to be ready. We are called to be ready at every hour of every day no matter what is going on in the world. That’s all we really need to know.
And you are right, the Church Jesus established have that understanding and is the one entrusted with the commission of preaching to all creatures. If then we see a church that admits to having no understanding of the Book of Revelation and so is not preaching the prophecies contained in that book, we can be sure that that church IS NOT the one established by Christ.
The Catholic Church understands the Book of Revelation–it simply doesn’t interpret it the way you believe. That doesn’t make it wrong, but you dear fellow Christian. You need to keep in mind that the Bible was compiled, copied, safe-guarded, read in Catholic parishes, and studied by Catholic bishops and lay people for centuries before your body of believers came along to claim it understood it better. I’m afraid I have to go with the Catholic Church on this one. I used to believe as you do now, but after doing some dispassionate and simple historical study I found out the truth of the matter. No 19th century ideas about the Book of Revelation can trump the Church founded by Christ himself–the Catholic Church.
 
The Book of Revelation is about prophecies of things which must happen in the future – PERIOD.
From a Catholic perspective, you’re free to believe that if you want to. However, that is not what the Catholic Church teaches.
 
I have heard some people including Michael Voris and Scott Hahn that the Book of Revelation is about the Catholic Mass. I am reading a book called The Apocalypse: Letter by Letter and it was written by a Catholic but his interpretation which he gives a good argument for is more in line of an apocalyptic future event than a resemblance to the Catholic mass. Does the Church have any official teaching on the Book of Revelation?
***It’s written in a time of severe Church Persecutation thus it is coded.

Having recently reading Dr. Scott Hanns Supper of The Lamb,*** where he builds a solid case for Revelations to about the Mass. I tend to agree with him for the following reasons.
  1. ***No Mass = No Jesus physically in our midst ***“All other Sacraments tend towards the Eucharist because it is Christ Himself, our pasch.”]
  2. *In time of severe persecution what could be possibly be more important [please don’t sat the "end times."
  3. ***Mt. 3:21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. And if those days had not been shortened, no human being would be saved; but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.Then if any one says to you, ‘Lo, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. For false Christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. Lo, I have told you beforehand. So, if they say to you, ‘Lo, he is in the wilderness,’ do not go out; if they say, ‘Lo, he is in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. For as the lightning comes from the east and shines as far as the west, so will be the coming of the Son of man. Wherever the body is, there the eagles * will be gathered together.
"Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken; then will appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory; and he will send out his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. ***

It was not necessary to repeat this information coded it was already understood.

4. Mt. 6:34 "Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Let the day’s own trouble be sufficient for the day. "
Code:
Mt. 25:13 ***"Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour." ***

Mt. 24: ***36 "But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only***. As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of man. For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and they did not know until the flood came and swept them all away, so will be the coming of the Son of man. Then two men will be in the field; one is taken and one is left. Two women will be grinding at the mill; one is taken and one is left. Watch therefore, for you do not know on what day your Lord is coming.
  1. It is impossible for the Bible to contradict itself:thumbsup:
6. Dr. Hann points out that the term “The Lamb” [see Jn. 1:29 and 35.] is used 28 times in 22 chapters. That friend is pertty solid evidence.

Love and prayers**
 
I’m sorry, I didn’t at all mean what you are saying here, hence the misunderstanding. By “our day” I mean just what you do–predicting the future in our day. Sorry about the misunderstanding. 🙂
Am I predicting the future? All I did was quote God’s Revelation which says the things He gave to John are prophecies which much happen in the future.
I’m afraid you have the wrong end of the stick with this. There is no “future interpretation” left to be interpreted. The things St. John wrote about have already come to pass, just as he said they would. You no doubt have been told otherwise, and have sat at the feet of those who say they know what the yet-to-be-fulfilled prophecies are, but they are only going according to a system devised for doing so that was completely foreign to the early Church. There is no “thousand year reign” yet to happen or any “secret rapture” and so on. It’s all made up out of thin air by well-meaning but misguided souls trying to figure out what does not need to be figured out. Why? Because Jesus said we wouldn’t know the day or the hour of his return–only signs of it. And those signs aren’t scattered throughout the Bible like some secret code one has to decipher in order to be ready. We are called to be ready at every hour of every day no matter what is going on in the world. That’s all we really need to know.
So, the Revelation that John wrote has already come to pass. Can you answer this question then: How is our earth now different from the earth during the time of the Apostle John? John wrote in Rev. 21:1: “And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away…” What has passed away from the old earth that we cannot see now of our new earth? This “new earth” was supposed to have “no more sea,” right? But why is our earth still covered with sea – all three quarters of it?

And Jerusalem – that “holy city” – what has become new with it? John wrote: “And I John saw the holy city NEW Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven…” Jerusalem now [as it has been since] is a hotbed of conflict. In fact it is now a powder keg loaded with nuclear potential! There is no city on earth that is so fraught with international tension as Jerusalem is today! So, what has become “new” of Jerusalem?

Also, now “the tabernacle of God is with men” (Rev. 21:3) – maybe you would claim it’s not really with men, but with the Roman Catholic Church (the Catholic faithful). Now, tell me, why are Catholics still dying, still shedding tears, still experiencing pain, when John wrote that “God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away” (Rev. 21:4)?

And that’s just for starters. There are many more that you need to explain so we can be convinced of your claim to understanding the Book of Revelation. You claim the prophecies there have already come to pass, so you must know WHEN it came to pass and WHAT events in history fulfilled those prophecies. Can you tell me those things? Unless you can spell them out, your claims are nothing more than empty talk.

Now, isn’t it funny that, here you are, telling me that this “thousand-year reign” of Christ is all made up out of thin air – when in fact it is actually YOU who have made up your story out of thin air! Can you show me WHERE in the Book of Revelation it says there is NO thousand-year reign? You CANNOT because it’s not there – because you’ve made it all up out of thin air!

But here’s what Revelation says: “And they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years” (Rev. 20:4), “And the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished” (v. 5), “But they shall be priests of God, and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years” (v. 6), “And when the thousand years are expired…” (v. 7). That’s four Scriptures that speak of the thousand years reign. Now, can you show me one Scripture– yes, just ONE will do – where it says there is no thousand-year reign? If you cannot, you are the one making up your story, not only out of thin air, but in direct opposition to the Revelation God gave to the Apostle John!

Now, you are right we wouldn’t know the day or the hour of Jesus’ return, only its signs. That’s what Jesus said. But do you know WHY He told us what signs will precede His imminent return? WHY would Christ bother giving us those signs if not to let us KNOW that His return is near?

Jesus said: “But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you these things… when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors.”

And we don’t really have to know those signs? But Christ said we need to take heed of those signs. Why, do you want us to ignore Christ’s words?

But yes, those signs are not scattered throughout the Bible like some secret code. Christ plainly told His disciples what those signs are. Anyone who has a Bible can turn to Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21 and read for himself what Jesus said. It’s not in code. It’s in plain, simple language.
 
The Catholic Church understands the Book of Revelation–it simply doesn’t interpret it the way you believe. That doesn’t make it wrong, but you dear fellow Christian. You need to keep in mind that the Bible was compiled, copied, safe-guarded, read in Catholic parishes, and studied by Catholic bishops and lay people for centuries before your body of believers came along to claim it understood it better. I’m afraid I have to go with the Catholic Church on this one. I used to believe as you do now, but after doing some dispassionate and simple historical study I found out the truth of the matter. No 19th century ideas about the Book of Revelation can trump the Church founded by Christ himself–the Catholic Church.
It’s easy enough to make empty claims. Anyone can do that. But as the old saying goes, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. If you believe your church understands the Book of Revelation why not explain the book to me? That is my challenge to you. Explain the Book of Revelation verse by verse, pointing out the time when each prophecy was fulfilled and what particular event in history fulfilled it. If you can do that, I will believe you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top