What is the "Crisis"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brother_John
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
anthony022071:
Also,many men would go into the priesthood not because they were especially devout,but because it was a career opportunity (as with the writer Andrew Greeley,who pretends he is a Catholic) – they were careerists.
Ah, I haven’t seen a Father Greeley bashing in a little while.

Anthony, you’re wrong. Father Greeley’s family was very well-to-do Chicago West Side Irish. He never needed to join the priesthood so he’d have a career. If you’d read what he wrote, you’d find that he grew up wanting to be a priest. How 'bout reading what he writes, rather than popping off like you know?

John
 
In many threads, reference is made to the “Crisis” in the Catholic Church today.

EXCLUDING sexual abuse/pedophilia, Please elaborate as to what you see as the “Crisis” or “Crises” (plural) in the Catholic Church today.
Paul VI noted the “auto-demolition”… JPII the “silent apostasy” of Europe…and you can’t see there is a Crisis?

The effects flowing from the promulgation of Vatican II and the introduction of the Novus Ordo Missae were very significant and like any effects they demand a proportionate cause. If the doctrines of Vatican II were orthodox, and the Novus Ordo is per se good and conducive of good in souls, then what was the cause which was proportionate to the catastrophic effects we have witnessed?

SFD
 
While some may believe that Vatican II is the root cause of lost vocations in the US, there were/are other factors too. Just think back to the time since V2. Moral decay is all around us, not just among Catholics. Unwed motherhood and divorce used to bring shame, but no more.

How many of us remember the Gideons coming into our schools and passing out pocket New Testaments? How many of us remember a daily prayer over the intercom with the Pledge of Alligience?

I personally believe that this same moral decay is what is feeding the explosion of non-denominational churches in the US. “Make your own rules, God forgives everything if you just ask, All I have to do is believe to be saved…”

It all adds up over time. It’s not just V2, it’s all around us, and not limited to Catholics by any stretch.
I agree, the crisis in the Church began way before VII. I would say it really began with the French Revolution when the seeds of Modernism were firmly planted. VII, as John XXIII said, opened the windows of the Church to the world, and unfortunately the smoke of Satan entered.
 
Paul VI noted the “auto-demolition”… JPII the “silent apostasy” of Europe…and you can’t see there is a Crisis?

The effects flowing from the promulgation of Vatican II and the introduction of the Novus Ordo Missae were very significant and like any effects they demand a proportionate cause. If the doctrines of Vatican II were orthodox, and the Novus Ordo is per se good and conducive of good in souls, then what was the cause which was proportionate to the catastrophic effects we have witnessed?

SFD
Yes, the effects listed in this thread, such as lack of vocations and decline in Mass attendance, are symptoms of the Crisis, they are the effects of the Crisis, they are not the cause of the Crisis.

With the convocation of the 2nd Vatican Council, an unprecedented situation has befallen the Church which threatens her doctrines and worship. Indeed, there are those who believe that what came out of the Council is a new religion altogether. The cause is that which was warned against by Pope Pius X in Pacendi Domini Gregis.

Thomas
 
Paul VI noted the “auto-demolition”… JPII the “silent apostasy” of Europe…and you can’t see there is a Crisis?

The effects flowing from the promulgation of Vatican II and the introduction of the Novus Ordo Missae were very significant and like any effects they demand a proportionate cause. If the doctrines of Vatican II were orthodox, and the Novus Ordo is per se good and conducive of good in souls, then what was the cause which was proportionate to the catastrophic effects we have witnessed?

SFD
Modern Secular Materialism and the selfishness it engenders has had far more of an effect across all of society - all cultures, all religions…nearly every corner of the world has suffered. This effect was felt in the Church in the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s as priests received terrible formation in the seminary and catechesis became poorer and poorer. By the time Vatican II began, things were sliding fast. And by the time the new liturgy was promulgated we already had thousands of very flawed men in the priesthood. These pre-Vatican II educated men then became the leaders of spineless abusive modern liturgy.
 
Modern Secular Materialism and the selfishness it engenders has had far more of an effect across all of society - all cultures, all religions…nearly every corner of the world has suffered. This effect was felt in the Church in the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s as priests received terrible formation in the seminary and catechesis became poorer and poorer. By the time Vatican II began, things were sliding fast. And by the time the new liturgy was promulgated we already had thousands of very flawed men in the priesthood. These pre-Vatican II educated men then became the leaders of spineless abusive modern liturgy.
The Church does not promulgate “abusive liturgy”. This is contrary to the infallibility of the Church in issuing Her disciplines.

Such things do not come from the Church.

SFD
 
Modern Secular Materialism and the selfishness it engenders has had far more of an effect across all of society - all cultures, all religions…nearly every corner of the world has suffered. This effect was felt in the Church in the 30’s, 40’s and 50’s as priests received terrible formation in the seminary and catechesis became poorer and poorer. By the time Vatican II began, things were sliding fast. And by the time the new liturgy was promulgated we already had thousands of very flawed men in the priesthood. These pre-Vatican II educated men then became the leaders of spineless abusive modern liturgy.
Really, and you went through seminary formation in the 50’s? And that’s why the seminaries were full and the Catholic Church was experiencing what has been called a “golden age” up until Vatican II?
 
Can we justly assume that falling Mass attendance is due to Vatican II?

What about the repeal of “Blue Laws” in many states, which forced some to work on Sundays, and made Sundays available for numerous other activities. Love this one. The blue laws were set in stone till the worship of God on Sunday became optional to many Christians and Catholics. If the churches had stood firm in their beliefs that Sunday was to be kept Holy then the laws would never have been changed. IMHO:D

Not saying that it’s RIGHT to miss Mass for these reasons, just acknowledging that those reasons exist. see above

The confession/communion relationship has been brought up in other threads. At one point in time, the Church was so tough on the confession/communinon “worthiness” issue, that participating communicants fell off to the point that the Church had to push the “Once a year at Easter” thing. Not sure you can blame that on Vatican II. The confessional was open prior to every Mass and if I remember correctly the lines were long and some were turned away because of the Mass or had to attend the next Mass. Now it is 1 hour per week and sometimes my family is the only one there. LOL a few weeks ago it was just the two families on our rural road:) .

I see the crisis as more of a secular issue…forces outside the church (TV, media, two-income homes so we can buy cool toys) drawing our attention away from fervent practice of our faith, than anything caused or created by Vatican II. Where is the teaching that reminds people that God is first and stuff is last with everything else in the middle?
 
Really, and you went through seminary formation in the 50’s? And that’s why the seminaries were full and the Catholic Church was experiencing what has been called a “golden age” up until Vatican II?
No, I judge them by their fruit. Remember all the really really wacked out pastors in the late 70’s and early 80’s? The ones who draped felt everywhere and put peace signs on the altar? The ones who “performed” the Mass? Those guys all went to the seminary in the late 50’s. So, what happened in their formation that made them think such actions were A-OK? Why did 67% of the priests who were accused of sexually abusing minors graduate from the seminary BEFORE 1969? The fruits of the seminaries from that time indicate that something was very rotten in the formation and discernment process.
 
No, I judge them by their fruit. Remember all the really really wacked out pastors in the late 70’s and early 80’s? The ones who draped felt everywhere and put peace signs on the altar? The ones who “performed” the Mass? Those guys all went to the seminary in the late 50’s. So, what happened in their formation that made them think such actions were A-OK? Why did 67% of the priests who were accused of sexually abusing minors graduate from the seminary BEFORE 1969? The fruits of the seminaries from that time indicate that something was very rotten in the formation and discernment process.
I think we can safely assume that almost nowhere in their seminary formation in the 40’s or 50’s were young men taught, or given examples of, using felt banners or many of the modern innovations prevalent today.

I would liken it to having a well disciplined (for the most part) team, military unit, or classroom. Quite often this discipline does not come from the young men themselves, but are the result of having an environment and coaches, drill instructors, and teachers which let it be known that discipline (and accomplishing a mission) are expected.

For example, if one has a strict drill instructor in the military, the platoon will know it and behave accordingly. If this strict drill instructor is replaced with one who is more lax, the formely well disciplined unit will become more lax as well. You can have a well coached championship basketball team one year and the same team can have a losing record the next if a new coach comes on the scene who does not maintain or instill discipine on the team. Or if an environment is changed to one where “winning”, or accomplishing a mission, is no longer deemed important.

I would submit that with the relaxing of discipline and changes to many of the external forms in the Church in almost every area after Vatican II it is only natural, given man’s concupiscence and tendency to take the easier route, that Priests became more lax as well and felt freer to become “creative” during the liturgy and share their personal ideas rather than the Faith.

Regarding the sex abuse scandal Catholic historian James Hitchcock noted “The scandals are a particularly grim result of misplaced post-conciliar optimism. Strict rules about clerical behavior were generally rescinded after the Council, on the grounds that priests could be trusted to act in appropriate ways.”

wf-f.org/JFH-GaudiumEtSpes.html
 
No, I judge them by their fruit. Remember all the really really wacked out pastors in the late 70’s and early 80’s? The ones who draped felt everywhere and put peace signs on the altar? The ones who “performed” the Mass? Those guys all went to the seminary in the late 50’s. So, what happened in their formation that made them think such actions were A-OK? Why did 67% of the priests who were accused of sexually abusing minors graduate from the seminary BEFORE 1969? The fruits of the seminaries from that time indicate that something was very rotten in the formation and discernment process.
Ever hear of Bella Dodd? Yes another one of those crazy traditional myths that has been proven true. Many of the “crazy priests” were put into the seminary by Bella Dodd and others like her.

Catholic Report Interview With Father Andrew Apostoli
catholicreport.org/?id=255
During the last 10-15 years of his life some began to say that Archbishop Sheen was passé, that his ideas were no longer relevant. Well I don’t know how anyone can say that the truth is passé. What I believe he really faced was resistance from some who wanted to change the authentic teachings of the Church.
The Lord also brought individuals to him who told of experiences which he probably wished he didn’t have to know. For example the one time ardent Communist Bella Dodd was a convert of Archbishop Sheen. She told him that while she was a Communist Joseph Stalin told her and other Communists that the Catholic Church was the greatest enemy of Communism. He wanted to undermine the Church by recruiting men into the priesthood who had no vocations and who would cause havoc by confusion and bad example. Bella Dodd told the Archbishop that she had personally recruited into the priesthood between 800 and 1200 men who had no vocations. Knowledge such as this was not easy for Archbishop Sheen. Yet it caused him to pray even harder.
 
In many threads, reference is made to the “Crisis” in the Catholic Church today.

EXCLUDING sexual abuse/pedophilia, Please elaborate as to what you see as the “Crisis” or “Crises” (plural) in the Catholic Church today.
I see the increase in the number of marriage “annulments” as a real crisis.
For example, in 1930, there were about 9 marriage annulments granted in the USA. In recent years, it has been running as high as 60,000 per year in the USA. That’s quite an increase. What happened to the Catholic support for families?
 
Ever hear of Bella Dodd? Yes another one of those crazy traditional myths that has been proven true. Many of the “crazy priests” were put into the seminary by Bella Dodd and others like her.

Catholic Report Interview With Father Andrew Apostoli
catholicreport.org/?id=255
During the last 10-15 years of his life some began to say that Archbishop Sheen was passé, that his ideas were no longer relevant. Well I don’t know how anyone can say that the truth is passé. What I believe he really faced was resistance from some who wanted to change the authentic teachings of the Church.
The Lord also brought individuals to him who told of experiences which he probably wished he didn’t have to know. For example the one time ardent Communist Bella Dodd was a convert of Archbishop Sheen. She told him that while she was a Communist Joseph Stalin told her and other Communists that the Catholic Church was the greatest enemy of Communism. He wanted to undermine the Church by recruiting men into the priesthood who had no vocations and who would cause havoc by confusion and bad example. Bella Dodd told the Archbishop that she had personally recruited into the priesthood between 800 and 1200 men who had no vocations. Knowledge such as this was not easy for Archbishop Sheen. Yet it caused him to pray even harder.
Well, if that was true that would seem to support my position that something was rotten in the seminaries before Vatican II. If the seminaries couldn’t pick up on the fact that there were Communist operatives becoming ordained, then they obviously were not being rigorous enough in their screening of potential priests.
 
Well, if that was true that would seem to support my position that something was rotten in the seminaries before Vatican II. If the seminaries couldn’t pick up on the fact that there were Communist operatives becoming ordained, then they obviously were not being rigorous enough in their screening of potential priests.
Except that if there really were communist operatives infiltrating seminaries, they probably would train to appear as some of the most pious and best candidates during the screening process. In fact, if I remember correctly, the infiltrators were instructed to appear to be pious and well behaved so as not to draw attention to themselves during seminary training.
 
Ah, I haven’t seen a Father Greeley bashing in a little while.

Anthony, you’re wrong. Father Greeley’s family was very well-to-do Chicago West Side Irish. He never needed to join the priesthood so he’d have a career. If you’d read what he wrote, you’d find that he grew up wanting to be a priest. How 'bout reading what he writes, rather than popping off like you know?

John
I have read Andrew Greeley’s books. Whatever his motives for joining the priesthood,they had nothing to do with devoutness or the desire to preach the gospel. He is indifferent to papal and ecclesiastical authority and he disagrees with Catholic doctrines. In regard to the Church’s teaching on morals,he is more of a Pelagian than a Catholic. He thinks that the papal encyclical Humanae Vitae was a big mistake,and he thinks that the Church’s emphasis on social justice is “cheap grace”,and a cover for what he thinks is the Church’s inadequacy in dealing with sexual issues. In one of his books,he claimed that Cardinal Bernadine made disparaging remarks to him about Humanae Vitae. Greeley is interested in Catholicism for the symbolism and for the local communities,rather than for Catholicism’s truth. He is not concerned about truth.
 
When a mother doesn’t discipline her children, she has nobody to blame but herself. Not her obedient children who do what their father demanded, not the disobedient children who learned that disobeying gave them want they wanted, not the father who said “listen to her while I’m gone.” She is the one to blame for her lack of diligence over her children. When the mother takes responsibility for her actions, or lack thereof, only then will things improve.
 
Big deal, it happened during the Reformation, and nothing happened. It’s happened a million times, nothing will happen. By the way the Eastern Orthodox Church has a Vocations crisis as well. It’s nothing new. I think a lot of it is that the United States was predominantly founded and populated by Protestants, and that’s what people continue to want. Whatever, history will change it’s course and the crisis will be over. If you have ever studied history they you will know that history always reverses itself. Perhaps a modern day St. Ignatius of Loyola will appear.
Uhh…not quite, holdencaulfield. The crisis is more than just a US crisis. And, “millions of times?”…a bit of an exageration, don’t you think? In fact, the Church in the US is actually more vibrant than in Europe; now, there’s a crisis! Church attendance in W Europe, the cradle of Christianity, is so low, that only about 5% of Catholics in France, e.g., attend Mass. And France is not atypical. So what is the crisis?

The answer to the question posed by Brother John is this:
Catholic clergy, religious, and modern theologians have embraced the secular culture of the day, as the new religion. B XVI has talked of this many times as “modernism as the new false god…” like the Israelites worshiping the golden calf. Lack of vocations, poorly catechised Catholics, an absence of ecclesiology, horrible architecture, ghastly secular “music” (vice, hymns and sacred music), stripping Churches bare of all statuary and the Communion rail…not to mention all the abuses of very form of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (regular readers here are too familiar with these); these are merely the symptoms.
 
I have read Andrew Greeley’s books. Whatever his motives for joining the priesthood,they had nothing to do with devoutness or the desire to preach the gospel. He is indifferent to papal and ecclesiastical authority and he disagrees with Catholic doctrines. In regard to the Church’s teaching on morals,he is more of a Pelagian than a Catholic. He thinks that the papal encyclical Humanae Vitae was a big mistake,and he thinks that the Church’s emphasis on social justice is “cheap grace”,and a cover for what he thinks is the Church’s inadequacy in dealing with sexual issues. In one of his books,he claimed that Cardinal Bernadine made disparaging remarks to him about Humanae Vitae. Greeley is interested in Catholicism for the symbolism and for the local communities,rather than for Catholicism’s truth. He is not concerned about truth.
Hi Anthony,

Would it be surprising if Cardinal Bernardin had made disparaging remarks about Humanae Vitae?
 
Well, if that was true that would seem to support my position that something was rotten in the seminaries before Vatican II. If the seminaries couldn’t pick up on the fact that there were Communist operatives becoming ordained, then they obviously were not being rigorous enough in their screening of potential priests.
As was reported in the article the communists" wanted to undermine the Church by recruiting men into the priesthood who had no vocations and who would cause havoc by confusion and bad example". That is exactly what happened.
Have you read Goodbye-Good Men.? This book names names and seminaries that inflitrated the Church with homosexual priests by rejecting all of the orthodox canidates via the screening process.Their prupose was to destroy the priesthood so that women and married men would be allowed to be priests.
An entire chapter of the book is about Father Trigilio and his path to priesthood. Here is an excerpt.
“Father John Trigilio, who co hosts Web of Faith, a popular apologetics program on Mother Angelica’s EWTN television network, recounted his seminary days…spanning three seminaries, three dioceses, and a host of rejections from others…because he overtly supported the teachings of the Church, he was targeted as an “orthodox” candidate”…during his first week at St Marks seminary in Erie, Pennsylvania] he was was accosted by a faculty priest, “ I hear you don’t want women priests?”…and then the priest warned me that if I wanted to get ordained, I’d better get those ‘old’and ‘outmoded’ ideas out of my head.”…I remember being humiliated because I wanted to pray the rosary…I think a lot of the younger students were sucked in by the gay subculture there…the students were actively coached to keep quite about the seminary’s strange goings-on…at Mary Immaculate Seminary in Northampton, Pennsylvania…four years of indoctrination…some guys wore women’s clothing, lingerie, makeup…[the faculty] would come right out and deny dogmas of the Catholic faith…we had a nun who taught us liturgy, She maintained that sacrifice is a pagan idea that needed to be expunged from the Mass. She also taught us that the Church has only six sacraments since she cannot receive the Sacrament of Holy Orders.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top