G
goofyjim
Guest
Well I certainly don’t want a minority ruling by any means. That would be frightening no matter which direction they took us-conservative or liberal.
I think what is frightening is that people resign themselves to the implication that they need to be ruled in the first place.Well I certainly don’t want a minority ruling by any means. That would be frightening no matter which direction they took us-conservative or liberal.
.To get back to my OP, this is one of the strengths of Catholic Social Teaching- the Church teaches that individuals are ultimately accountable to their own conscience, it places the responsibility for one’s actions at the level of the individual, not at the level of government, and teaches that every human person is capable of leading a moral life so long as they have a properly formed conscience
Actually Tom Woods is a historian, not an economist..
And that is the beauty of the Catholic Church. And some wonder why so many Austrian economists are Catholic? (from Thomas Woods to Otto von Hapsburg - although the Crown Prince is more of a fellow traveler)
I think what is frightening is that people resign themselves to the implication that they need to be ruled in the first place.
I agree, and yet does not the massive entitlement programs of the liberal left come into play here? Do not we, as individuals, need to work in order to eat (I know this is scriptural), and yet, through human weakness, people want to be taken care of - they do not want the responsibility of true liberty. I’m sure we’ve all heard the term welfare is the plank to socialism. In other words, “let the government take care of me. I will resign my rights and privileges and bend to the will of government so that they might do so.”