C
Cat
Guest
The term “tridentine Holy Spirit” was used in a prayer in another thread in this section of CA.
I have not heard this term. What is it?
Thank you.
I have not heard this term. What is it?
Thank you.
Yes, context might helpIn what thread was the term used? I can’t seem to find it.
James
Thank you!Yes, context might help. I have never heard the term either but, again, context might help.
Oh, I found that thread, it is here forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=203604
No clue from context what it means. Perhaps we should ask the person who posted it.
Brenda V.
I thionk I can answer it from personal experience…The term “tridentine Holy Spirit” was used in a prayer in another thread in this section of CA.
I have not heard this term. What is it?
Thank you.
I wonder if the congregation who attended Mass with St Paul felt the same way, since clearly his Masses fit the criteria of “charismatic” since tongues and other manifestations were routine with him. Of course that is way before Trent or even Gregorian chant were a gleam in some pope’s eye. Since Paul is an authority on the workings of the Holy Spirit in the Church, it might be good practice to discern evidence of those workings in light with his views, rather than through personal emotion and preference.I But when I attend a Mass of a “Charasmatic priest” where he speaks “in tongues”, people all raise their hands to him…they clap and wail and sway - they entire congregation along with the priest at the altar…he only wears an alb and stole- uses a wine glass for a chalice… the “Tridentine Holy Spirit” (if that is what it’s called) makes me wanna throw up- makes me feel disgusted— makes me want to leave this “Sacreligious” event.
Ken
I somehow doubt that the early Church’s experience with Tongues had very much in common with what the Charismatics are doing these days. Sorry, it wasn’t quite the same thing. It should be noted that abuses started quite early in the Church and a great deal of what Paul wrote was in order to correct those same abuses. Also, if I am not mistaken, Paul did have some harsh words on certain charismatic events did he not? I do seem to recall that.I wonder if the congregation who attended Mass with St Paul felt the same way, since clearly his Masses fit the criteria of “charismatic” since tongues and other manifestations were routine with him. Of course that is way before Trent or even Gregorian chant were a gleam in some pope’s eye. Since Paul is an authority on the workings of the Holy Spirit in the Church, it might be good practice to discern evidence of those workings in light with his views, rather than through personal emotion and preference.
You may actually be right…and if so it is nothing to smile about.Maybe this entity is supposed to be distinguished from the Novus Ordo Holy Spirit!
![]()