T
Thoughtfulone
Guest
Life expectancy has nothing to do with it.A 14 year can’t legally consent to marry in most U.S. states in AD 2011. . .but that didn’t mean the reason is that all 14 year old lacks the capacity to make such a judgment, always have and always will.
As I mentioned earlier, I believe, the middle class 14 year old in AD 2011 U.S. may be more technologically advanced than a 14 year old living 100, 200, 500, 1000 or more years ago.
But considering that a 14 year old today would have (in the U.S.) the statistical likelihood of living easily to age 84. . .that 14 year old has lived one SIXTH of life with 5/6 to go.
A 14 year old living in a first world country (Brittain) 500 years ago had a life expectancy overall of just about 30 years.
That 14 year old had already lived nearly HALF his/her life.
I’m not saying the 14 year old then is like the 42 year old of today, but I am saying that in a very different cultural, sociological, and environmental background with much SHORTER life spans, a 14 year old by necessity was more ‘mature’ and able to function as a mature person than SOME 14 year olds currently.
How about third world countries where the life expectancy is still under age 50? (Yes, they exist in AD 2011). Where literacy rates are under 50% and poverty is rife. You think that just because a 14 year old is (by “western psychology theories”) not capable of ‘understanding’ that 14 year olds who have lived about 1/3 of their lives would be just as 'incapable of understanding?"
You know at age 54 I can still remember when 18 was the threshold of adulthood, not the start of the next 12 years of “we can do what adults do without their responsibilities! madness” that we see currently in Gen X and Y. We were deemed able to commit ourselves to military service, to marriage, to the priesthood and religious life, and all sorts of actions which required being able to ‘understand’ all sorts of complex ideas. Silly us, we had no IDEA our little brains were not capable of making those judgments! How did we ever manage to build the kind of societies and raise the kind of geniuses who try to tell us what we are, and are not, 'capable of scientifically THINKING"?
Personally, I would think that in general, 18 is the YOUNGEST that one might be capable of such thinking and decision-making, and then only rarely, and that person would probably be a girl simply because their brains mature faster.
I think a rule of thumb would be that if a person is not mature enough to understand and accept the FULL ramifications of marriage, then one is most definitely not mature enough to understand and accept the FULL ramifications of mortal sin.