I’m not sure what the OP is asking about specifically. But what the heck. I never hesitate to answer a question when I don’t even know the question.
I don’t have a crystal ball concerning the next president. Right now, if I had to guess or die, I would guess that the female presidential contender will lose the primary and that her current male adversary will self-destruct before November. But right now, I wouldn’t bet money on the outcome of this election at all.
People are afraid, and they tend to do desperate things when that’s the situation. There is reason to be afraid, but not sufficient reason to be in terror. In my opinion, the financial meltdown we’re now seeing is going to be more serious than it looks like it will be right now. Part of the problem is that nobody even knows what the depth of the problem is. If I had to guess, I am going to guess that we’ll be in recession (however they want to define it) at least until the end of 2008, and think maybe mid 2009 might show a clear turnaround. It takes quite awhile to even identify what mortgages and securities based on them are going to fail. Certainly, some banks will fail. Most won’t. The biggest danger is a severe meltdown in confidence. That’s what the Bear Stearns bailout was all about. I disagreed with it at first, but later realized that a Bear Stearns failure would throw billiions of dollars of financial instruments onto a market unready to absorb them. Values would plummet and a vast number of financial institutions would be at least technically bankrupt. We could have had a failure cascade, and still could. But I don’t think we will.
More jobs are going to be lost before this is over and there are going to be a LOT of foreclosures. All these rescue plans are mostly window dressing, and won’t change much of anything. Most mortgages will not be foreclosed because most people will still have jobs and will do everything in their power to avoid foreclosure. You know, even in the Great Depression, when unemployment was 25%, 75% of the people still had jobs. This is not going to be a repeat of the 1930s.
Recovery will be slow, but will pick up steam. Whoever is in office when it does will get the credit for it. But the truth is that the president of the U.S. has almost no control over the business cycle.
Iraq will continue to be a very troubling place for two more years; a sort of troubling place for two more, and will be a potential trouble spot for decades; like South Korea is now and like Germany was for decades. No matter who is elected president, the war will continue. McCain and Clinton are major league hawks. Imaginably, Obama might pull out, but it would cause such a mess that I doubt he’ll dare to do it.
That’s my guesswork. What’s yours?