G
GEddie
Guest
If you had proven such, there would be no need for belief.I did prove it, but you don’t want to believe it. :bounce:
ICXC NIKA
If you had proven such, there would be no need for belief.I did prove it, but you don’t want to believe it. :bounce:
Truth is state of belief that something is true, our state of belief however is not absolutely true.If you had proven such, there would be no need for belief.
ICXC NIKA
Time ent:from the From Middle English time, tyme from Old English *tīma*Time is a measure in which events can be ordered from the past through the present into the future, it also the measure of durations of events and the intervals between them.What is time?
Incorrect, Objective Truth is what corresponds to the actual circumstances. Your belief of what is true may not correctly correspond to the reality of Objective Truth.Truth is state of belief that something is true, our state of belief however is not absolutely true.
Why should anyone accept this definition of truth?Truth is state of belief that something is true, our state of belief however is not absolutely true.
But why events have duration?Time ent:from the From Middle English time, tyme from Old English *tīma*Time is a measure in which events can be ordered from the past through the present into the future, it also the measure of durations of events and the intervals between them.
What is objective truth? How we can realize it? To me there exist truth and absolute truth we have access to former but not latter.Incorrect, Objective Truth is what corresponds to the actual circumstances.
So you are repeating what I state unless you mean something different by objective truth which I equate it to absolute truth.Your belief of what is true may not correctly correspond to the reality of Objective Truth.
Thanks, so I am almost sure that what you stated is what I stated.The difference is whether or not your belief corresponds to that objective reality.
Because truth is subject of change but not absolute truth.Why should anyone accept this definition of truth?
Nope, truth is something that is.. Whether anybody believes it or not is beside the point.Truth is state of belief that something is true, our state of belief however is not absolutely true.
Change happens.But why events have duration?
So you claim. Proven? No.Because truth is subject of change but not absolute truth.
He does have a point.So you claim. Proven? No.
But…, not the whole point.He does have a point.
To equivocate the two muddies the water and leads to confusion.Some truths are subject to change. For example, the statement “Davidv is alive” is a true statement, but was not true 200 years ago.
Likewise, the statement “GW Bush is the president of the USA” is false now, but was true ten years ago.
But absolute truth, for example, “God is,” never changes.
ICXC NIKA.
Tell that to the atheistsIf you had proven such, there would be no need for belief.
ICXC NIKA
No change is possible without awareness? Whose awareness? The universe had roughly 13 billion years of change before humans came along to be aware of it.What I am arguing so far is that no change is possible without awareness which resides in consciousness.
Be careful here. You’re saying that change only happens when someone (or something) is aware of the change.Hence, change is related to awareness, in simple word awareness work as an engine pushing us forward.
Awareness is not a force in nature at all. Awareness can’t cause things to happen, it can only observe. Things constantly happen all around you without your awareness, or even the awareness of the things being acted upon.Awareness however is not the only force in nature as all events should manifest themselves in a blink as it was stated.
For that matter, things happen within us all the time without our awareness, else there would be no need for medical testing.No change is possible without awareness? Whose awareness? The universe had roughly 13 billion years of change before humans came along to be aware of it.
Be careful here. You’re saying that change only happens when someone (or something) is aware of the change.
Awareness however is not the only force in nature as all events should manifest themselves in a blink as it was stated.
Awareness is not a force in nature at all. Awareness can’t cause things to happen, it can only observe. Things constantly happen all around you without your awareness, or even the awareness of the things being acted upon.
To answer your question “what is time”, in my understanding time is a human construct that we use to measure change.
So we might have problem in definition, because to me the absolute truth is something that IS. Truth is the current state of belief and it is necessary because whatever we do is based on it. Absolute truth is something that we are looking for and it is not subject to change or doubt. Absolute truth is purely subjective.Nope, truth is something that is.. Whether anybody believes it or not is beside the point.
But that is we have in our disposal right now and forever, a light which illuminates around. It illuminate farther as we try harder but it can never illuminate the edge.If something like a world-mind **is, **then like light, life or movement, no-one should have to “believe” in it.
ICXC NIKA
Could you please elaborate?Change happens.
No, I just define what do I mean with truth and absolute truth.So you claim. Proven? No.