M
MarthaMartha
Guest
I always felt I was in Heaven when I attended Latin mass as a youngster, especially when the choir was singing.
I couldn’t agree more! Also, which wasn’t one of the options, I love the solemn reverance and obediance to the ruberics (sp?) of the mass.Everything !!!
In my opinion, it’s not just the use of Latin that makes the TLM more attractive. It is all the gestures, the prayers, the profound reverence, and all of the rich traditions that make the Traditional Latin Mass so appealing.I don’t particularly dislike it, but I prefer my Mass in the venacular. I don’t have a problem with Latin, which is a good grounding for English BTW. I don’t have to necessarily see what’s going on at the altar, although it is helpful. I don’t mind kneeling to receive our Lord (our parish never yanked out the altar rails, and they are BEAUTIFUL), but don’t mind bowing and standing, either. I don’t like the little old ladies off someplace else with their rosaries. I don’t like hats or veils (I am a veteran of the beanie and “hat clip” a giant headband with a painful rivet on either side, worn right above the ears). I don’t like the “tsk-tsk” of people who feel Latin, particularly in the Tridententine, is so superior over venacular. Is it because mine was one of the first First Communion classes to go English in 1965? Do I feel more engaged in English? Got me. That’s the way I prefer it, though. Maybe some day, I’ll have to attend an indult for the venacular.
Maybe it’s not the Latin so much as the reverance which is felt during a Tridentine Mass. In our church the priests often feel free to laugh or make comments if a mistake is made; not that I’m against humor, but it takes away from the reverence and focus of the mass. That’s just one example.I guess I just don’t get it! I am a cradle Catholic and “cut my teeth” on the Latin Mass. I have very fond memories of serving as an altar boy, learning my Latin responses, ect. But would I rather celebrate the Mass in english----you betcha! For the life of me, I don’t understand the allure of the old Latin Mass. Why is it that some say they feel the presence of Chist there and not when english is being spoken? Hey, remember that Jesus spoke Aramaic–not Latin. Don’t get me wrong, if that’s what you need to meet your Lord, by all means do it. It’s just that I don’t understand why. Peace
It’s not just the use of Latin that makes the TLM more attractive. It is all the gestures, the prayers, the profound reverence, and all of the rich traditions that make the Traditional Latin Mass so appealing. IMHO, a Tridentine Mass celebrated in English (does anyone know if this has ever or could ever be done, btw?) would still be more beautiful than a Novus Ordo Mass celebrated in Latin.I don’t particularly dislike it, but I prefer my Mass in the venacular. I don’t have a problem with Latin, which is a good grounding for English BTW. I don’t have to necessarily see what’s going on at the altar, although it is helpful. I don’t mind kneeling to receive our Lord (our parish never yanked out the altar rails, and they are BEAUTIFUL), but don’t mind bowing and standing, either. I don’t like the little old ladies off someplace else with their rosaries. I don’t like hats or veils (I am a veteran of the beanie and “hat clip” a giant headband with a painful rivet on either side, worn right above the ears). I don’t like the “tsk-tsk” of people who feel Latin, particularly in the Tridententine, is so superior over venacular. Is it because mine was one of the first First Communion classes to go English in 1965? Do I feel more engaged in English? Got me. That’s the way I prefer it, though. Maybe some day, I’ll have to attend an indult for the venacular.
Whoops! I made it seem as though the laughing & commentary by the priests is occuring during the Tridentine Mass. Sorry! I was referring to our parish which uses the NO mass. Wonderful people - a bit misguided.Maybe it’s not the Latin so much as the reverance which is felt during a Tridentine Mass. In our church the priests often feel free to laugh or make comments if a mistake is made; not that I’m against humor, but it takes away from the reverence and focus of the mass. That’s just one example.
What a beautiful Church!I chose the atmosphere and reverence. There is something about having a priest process in to Gregorian Chant during the High Mass that just puts your mind on the right place.
Of course, everything on the poll could fall under “atmosphere and reverence” if you applied a wide enough definition.
Enter a brief plug for the Church that made me fall in love with the TLM - St. Mary’s oratory in Wausau, WI. I was stuck in the middle of cow country for a year expecting to find a spiritual desert, and instead found this jewel. Look in their gallery for a picture of their main altar - it’s to die for!
institute-christ-king.org/index.html
Incidentally, I had a good friend of mine recently join the ICR’s order of nuns. She’ll be moving to Tuscany in September! Here’s their website: institute-christ-king.org/AdorersRoyalHeart.htm
See if you can ever get your hands on a copy of the 1965 edition of the Roman Missal. It was the first Missal printed in the vernacular by decree of Vatican II - but it’s NOT the Novus Ordo Missal of 1970. This beautiful Missal was in place from Advent 1964 to the beginning of Advent 1969, when it was replaced by the Pauline Novus Ordo.IMHO, a Tridentine Mass celebrated in English (does anyone know if this has ever or could ever be done, btw?) would still be more beautiful than a Novus Ordo Mass celebrated in Latin.
I should add that no, the Tridentine Mass may never be celebrated in the vernacular. This was stipulated by the Holy See in 1984, when it first granted limited permission for the celebration of the 1962 Missal. (See link below to read “Stipulation C” of the 1984 indult).IMHO, a Tridentine Mass celebrated in English (does anyone know if this has ever or could ever be done, btw?) would still be more beautiful than a Novus Ordo Mass celebrated in Latin.