What Makes Catholicism the Only Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheGoodLife
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, I didn’t take that out of context. The “church” can be just a few people… where 2 or 3 are gathered. You are stuck on believing “church” means the RCC gathered together with a priest in a “holy” building.
You are stuck on believing that a priest and a building by themselves exclude “church”. Where do you meet- in an open field? Who leads your gathering, do you cast lots or play rock-paper-scissors to see who leads the group?
 
Well that’s a lie. There were ALWAYS “faith in Jesus, repentant” believers in Christ. Believers of repentance without a pope. My guess is the RCC started calling true believers “protestants” when Martin Luther left the RCC.

The Word of God is TRUTH… not just a pillar.
It’s not a lie, its the Truth.

First we were called Christians in Antioch and in 107 AD in the same place the Christian Church was called Catholic by St. Ignatius of Antioch.

St. Ignatius Letter to the Smyrnaeans (written in 107 AD). St. Ignatius of Antioch was the Disciple of St. John the Apostle.

Chapter 8. Let nothing be done without the bishop.

See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.

History proves you wrong. I don’t lie when it comes to Church history, believers. I am not here to deceived anyone. I only speak the Truth.
 
Well that’s a lie. There were ALWAYS “faith in Jesus, repentant” believers in Christ. Believers of repentance without a pope. My guess is the RCC started calling true believers “protestants” when Martin Luther left the RCC.

The Word of God is TRUTH… not just a pillar.
Martin Luther also fanned the flames of intolerance, “Whoever teaches otherwise than I teach, condemns God, and must remain a child of hell.”

Theodore of Beza wrote: “What crime can be greater or more heinous than heresy, which sets at nought the word of God and all ecclesiastic discipline? Christian magistrates, do your duty to God [speaking in Calvin’s Geneva of 1554], who has put the sword into your hands for the honor of His majesty; strike valiantly these monsters in the guise of men.” He went on to characterize those who demanded freedom of conscience “worse than the tyranny of the pope. It is better to have a tyrant, no matter how cruel he may be, than to let everyone do as he pleases.”

biblia.com/christianity/inquisition.htm#Protestants
 
Pope is not mentioned in the bible. However, I do believe the RCC is vividly described in Revelations chapter 17.
The Pope comes from the word, Papa, or father. It is not in the Bible but Catholic believes that the first Pope is St. Peter. He was the bishop of Rome which was succeeded by Linus, then Cletus, and then Clement of Rome. We even have writings of Clement himself.

There were bishops then at the time of Apostles.

I would really have to disagree with your interpretation that the RCC is the one mention in Revelations Chapter 17 that describe harlot.

There is error in your interpretation. The Babylon describe there is the ancient pagan Rome. The Book of Revelationn was written in the late first Century during the persecution of the Early Christians. It is not to be read in modern context.

That’s just pure Protestant bias
 
Here it is AGAIN. Just so that people can easily see the questions you are trying to evade… Either provide us with an answer to these inconsistencies, or bite the bullet and admit that you don’t have one.

**
You’re kidding me! What are you basing your blind assumption that this was written by GOD, then? Did you see God write down the words himself?? NO… without any reasoning involved, you believe it because your parents/pastor/friends/whoever else TOLD you that it was written down by God, and then you accepted it on sheer blind faith.

What’s to keep other religions from doing the same thing?

Circular reasoning again. See above. When all is said and done, MAN ended up putting ink to paper somehow, both in the case of history books, and that Bible at home that you think you worship. You didn’t conclude through reasoning that the Bible was the word of God, you blindly assume that it is.

And I suppose you NEVER sin now?
There’s nothing “blind” about my faith. I believe God’s Word to be true. I don’t worship the Bible. I don’t pray to the Bible or kneel down in front of it. I worship Jesus and God’s Word teaches me how to be a true follower of Jesus Christ.

How exactly can my faith be blind? The Bible described the earth as circular with volume hanging on nothing. I look at Israel and the prophecies fulfilled. Can’t argue with that. Bible must be true. Either believe in God or evolution. I choose God.
 
Pope is not mentioned in the bible. However, I do believe the RCC is vividly described in Revelations chapter 17.
Great… the Pope cannot exist because the word “Pope” is not explicitly mentioned in the Bible, but somehow you were able to get the phrase “Roman Catholic Church” out of Revelation (it’s not called “Revelations” 😉 ) chapter 17. This gets funnier by the day.

btw, would you mind giving a straight answer to those other questions of mine you keep ignoring?
 
There’s nothing “blind” about my faith. I believe God’s Word to be true. I don’t worship the Bible. I don’t pray to the Bible or kneel down in front of it. I worship Jesus and God’s Word teaches me how to be a true follower of Jesus Christ.

How exactly can my faith be blind? The Bible described the earth as circular with volume hanging on nothing. I look at Israel and the prophecies fulfilled. Can’t argue with that. Bible must be true. Either believe in God or evolution. I choose God.
The Bible is True because the Church claim it is True. In a way, you recognized the Church’s authority since she form the Bible 300 yrs after Jesus ascended into heaven.
 
So what are bishops?
Acts Of Apostles 20 28 Take heed to yourselves, and to the whole flock, wherein the Holy Ghost hath placed you bishops, to rule the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.
 
There’s nothing “blind” about my faith. I believe God’s Word to be true. I don’t worship the Bible. I don’t pray to the Bible or kneel down in front of it. I worship Jesus and God’s Word teaches me how to be a true follower of Jesus Christ.
Great, another red herring… look I know you don’t really “worship” the Bible. That was tongue-in-cheek if you really couldn’t tell. Case closed on that, ok?
How exactly can my faith be blind? The Bible described the earth as circular with volume hanging on nothing. I look at Israel and the prophecies fulfilled. Can’t argue with that. Bible must be true.
Which verses are you talking about? Anyway, this would still be basing your belief in the divine inspiration of a whole COLLECTION of books based on a few verses found in some of the books. You’re a long way from making any sense out of this.
Either believe in God or evolution. I choose God.
Um, we’re not talking about evolution… nice try at derailing the thread again though.
 
Great… the Pope cannot exist because the word “Pope” is not explicitly mentioned in the Bible, but somehow you were able to get the phrase “Roman Catholic Church” out of Revelation (it’s not called “Revelations” 😉 ) chapter 17. This gets funnier by the day.

btw, would you mind giving a straight answer to those other questions of mine you keep ignoring?
Your pope exists whether want to believe it or not. He’s your “holy father”. And, I’m not ignoring your questions…you just don’t like my answers.
 
Great, another red herring… look I know you don’t really “worship” the Bible. That was tongue-in-cheek if you really couldn’t tell. Case closed on that, ok?

Which verses are you talking about? Anyway, this would still be basing your belief in the divine inspiration of a whole COLLECTION of books based on a few verses found in some of the books. You’re a long way from making any sense out of this.

Um, we’re not talking about evolution… nice try at derailing the thread again though.
You questioned the Word of God being true. So I cited verses as I would an atheist doubting the Word of God. Only God would have known the true shape of the earth.
 
Your pope exists whether want to believe it or not. He’s your “holy father”. And, I’m not ignoring your questions…you just don’t like my answers.
Your answers are dishonest. The fact that the Pope did exist is reality. He is Peter, because Jesus built his Church upon Peter in Matthew 16:18.
 
Your pope exists whether want to believe it or not. He’s your “holy father”. And, I’m not ignoring your questions…you just don’t like my answers.
9 “Call none your father upon earth”… Neither be ye called masters. The meaning is that our Father in heaven is incomparably more to be regarded, than any father upon earth: and no master to be followed, who would lead us away from Christ. But this does not hinder but that we are by the law of God to have a due respect both for our parents and spiritual fathers, (1 Cor. 4. 23: 15,) and for our masters and teachers.

drbo.org/chapter/47023.htm
 
Your answers are dishonest. The fact that the Pope did exist is reality. He is Peter, because Jesus built his Church upon Peter in Matthew 16:18.
They are not dishonest just because you’ve been deceived into believing that lie. The church was NEVER built on Peter but Peter’s confession that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. Petros and Petra are differences which you refuse to believe.
 
You questioned the Word of God being true. So I cited verses as I would an atheist doubting the Word of God. Only God would have known the true shape of the earth.
Any Catholic acknowledge the Word of God in its Fullness because we believed that Jesus built a Church upon Peter, and that Peter and Apostles handed their authority to the bishops. We see this in the Catholic Church as well as the Orthodox Church.

Two of these Churches are ancient and are deep with in worship to the Word of God in their Liturgy.
 
They are not dishonest just because you’ve been deceived into believing that lie. The church was NEVER built on Peter but Peter’s confession that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. Petros and Petra are differences which you refuse to believe.
Many Catholics have heard that “kepha” is used in both places in this verse ("You are Peter [kepha] and on this rock [kepha] I will build my Church . . . "), but few have seen it with their own eyes.

So I he it and here 'tis:

jimmyakin.org/2005/04/while_were_at_i.html
 
9 “Call none your father upon earth”… Neither be ye called masters. The meaning is that our Father in heaven is incomparably more to be regarded, than any father upon earth: and no master to be followed, who would lead us away from Christ. But this does not hinder but that we are by the law of God to have a due respect both for our parents and spiritual fathers, (1 Cor. 4. 23: 15,) and for our masters and teachers.

drbo.org/chapter/47023.htm
Then why does the RCC insist on giving the title of “father” to the priests? Jesus said to His true followers not to give that title to anyone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top