F
floresco
Guest
Really, it doesn’t. It was not even especially useful the first time you said it.Shall I repeat it again? It is a point to be made to all. And one the bears repeating.
Really, it doesn’t. It was not even especially useful the first time you said it.Shall I repeat it again? It is a point to be made to all. And one the bears repeating.
I don’t get you. What is with the straw-man argument about it not being an official term? Who cares? We’re using the English language here and we’re permitted to do that. There’s nothing wrong with a guy identifying himself as a conservative catholic and wanting to hang out with like minded folks. Nor is there a problem with a charismatic catholic using that term to describe their style of devotion or worship.Ok I am a Papal Catholic.
Or a Scripture and Tradition Catholic
Or a Catholic who is a Christian
You see by taking on an aspect that applies to the nature of being Catholic and then using it to define only my little cliche I co-opt a term for myself and my little group …which belongs by nature to “Catholic”. Hence it would be a misnomer.
(gee very heavy suggestions of my motives …:ehhI don’t get you. What is with the straw-man argument about it not being an official term? Who cares? We’re using the English language here and we’re permitted to do that. There’s nothing wrong with a guy identifying himself as a conservative catholic and wanting to hang out with like minded folks. Nor is there a problem with a charismatic catholic using that term to describe their style of devotion or worship.
Why are you trying to fabricate nonexistant rules that say Catholics may only use adjectives in the English language that have officially been designated by the church?
The term means what it means in the English language. You’re being silly and this is beginning to smell like an intentional flame war intent on raising tensions and dividing Catholics on this forum (ironically the result that the name is falsely accused of having).
I’m done listening to the childish “I’m going to continue repeating my dislike of the word until everyone agrees with me despite the fact that it is an established word in the English language and has been for decades”.
Could you clarify this statement please? I have not heard anything like this.The SSPX just rejoined with Rome, so they are not split off anymore.
Then I guess some “liberal” Catholics could just as easily be traditional Catholics. But… no.After reading this thread and many others like it, thewanderer, I have come to believe that what makes a “traditional catholic” is one who thinks that their way is the only way, whatever that way is.![]()
Repeatedly stating that it is a misnomer does not answer the question and is not helpful. Please stop interfering with the people who want to discuss the topic of the thread.Even the very uses that one has seen on this forum over time – of “Traditional Catholic” --has so many many different meanings.
A person might use it to mean they are a member of a group who rejects the latest Popes…
another cause the prefer the EF of the Roman Liturgy…
another cause they have some particular love for the Council of Trent…
another uses it cause they reject Vatican II
etc etc
What on earth does it mean???
Hence even the question of the thread.
You mean like a person who keeps repeating his opinion instead of engaging in two-way discussion?After reading this thread and many others like it, thewanderer, I have come to believe that what makes a “traditional catholic” is one who thinks that their way is the only way, whatever that way is.![]()
This is at the heart of this question of the thread:Even the very uses that one has seen on this forum over time – of “Traditional Catholic” --has so many many different meanings.
A person might use it to mean they are a member of a group who rejects the latest Popes…
another cause the prefer the EF of the Roman Liturgy…
another cause they have some particular love for the Council of Trent…
another uses it cause they reject Vatican II
etc etc
What on earth does it mean???
Hence even the question of the thread.
Where did I use the term misnomer there?? I am not interfering with anyone I am posting on a thread on a particular topic.Repeatedly stating that it is a misnomer does not answer the question and is not helpful. Please stop interfering with the people who want to discuss the topic of the thread.
This goes to the heart of the question of the thread itself.Even the very uses that one has seen on this forum over time – of “Traditional Catholic” --has so many many different meanings.
A person might use it to mean they are a member of a group who rejects the latest Popes…
another cause the prefer the EF of the Roman Liturgy…
another cause they have some particular love for the Council of Trent…
another uses it cause they reject Vatican II
etc etc
What on earth does it mean???
Hence even the question of the thread.
When I started attending the EF rather than the OF whenever possible, I found that a term was attached to Catholics who do this. I didn’t hijack anything. I found the language this way. I would perfectly happy to use some other term if other people understood it and I could communicate with it.I think even this thread illustrates that one kind of traditional people who try to hijack this word to the annoyance of everyone else.
I guess its often because when a person says he is traditional he is drawing a line between himself and other serious Catholics.
So I say to these… loose that word and be more clear in your preference![]()
Well… just see this thread… Its full of different oppinions about what the word means and ought to meanWhen I started attending the EF rather than the OF whenever possible, I found that a term was attached to Catholics who do this. I didn’t hijack anything. I found the language this way. I would perfectly happy to use some other term if other people understood it and I could communicate with it.
While there are people giving opinions about what the term ought to mean, I think that everyone can tell what Mass I want to go to when I say I am a traditional Catholic. Perhaps I could accomplish the same thing by calling myself an “extraordinary Catholic”, taking the name of my preferred form of Mass. Or, since I believe that organic development is very important in liturgy, perhaps I could be called an “organic Catholic”. Or should that be “developmental Catholic”?Well… just see this thread… Its full of different oppinions about what the word means and ought to mean![]()
This is true about any term. Orthodox, for example, perceive themselves as “Catholic,” and Catholics perceive themselves as Orthodox. It is possible to put a word in context, and make use of it contextually.What on earth does it mean???
Most self-described “traditional Catholics” do mean the same thing when they label themselves as such.Well… just see this thread… Its full of different oppinions about what the word means and ought to mean![]()