What Muslims are taught in their mosques - unbiased

  • Thread starter Thread starter famdigy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course you do. That’s obvious. You believe only what “you” generate between your ears.
Better than believing what is generated between the ears of other people, like that madman Mohammad.
And that’s a good-ish start, but…

Notice the predominant “inward directed you-ness” of your thoughts above.

It’s YOU LOOKING (you receiving),
It’s YOU ADMIRING (you receiving),
It’s YOU BEING GOOD (this one has promise! It’s you giving, but it’s you giving “to get something wonderful”, below),
It’s YOU GETTING SOMETHING WONDERFUL (you receiving).

It’s all about YOU, buckeroo…

That ain’t what “believing in God” is about.
Better than ‘believing in God’ just because YOU dont want to burn in hell.
that’s a perfectly sensible question you’ve posed there, chief. 🙂
and the answer?
Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
Minumura mo ba ako? Gago ka rin! 😉
 
Quote:Originally Posted by Keikiolu forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif

Of course you do. That’s obvious. You believe only what “you” generate between your ears.
Better than believing what is generated between the ears of other people, like that madman Mohammad.
You’d give up ALL ideas not generated, or discovered, or revelealed to, by you because some ideas from others are “useless or worse”…?

Excellent tack. See where that might get you in life…
And that’s a good-ish start, but…
Notice the predominant “inward directed you-ness” of your thoughts above.
It’s YOU LOOKING (you receiving),
It’s YOU ADMIRING (you receiving),
It’s YOU BEING GOOD (this one has promise! It’s you giving, but it’s you giving “to get something wonderful”, below),
It’s YOU GETTING SOMETHING WONDERFUL (you receiving).
It’s all about YOU, buckeroo…
That ain’t what “believing in God” is about.
Better than ‘believing in God’ just because YOU dont want to burn in hell.
Hmmm,… how is that NOT about you, and your egocentrism?

I don’t think it’s a good thing to believe in God just to “avoid hell”, mostly because that wouldn’t be very effective in keeping you out of hell if you just nominally “believed in God” without understanding and acting on what that phrase actually meant.

You have a bad impression of Christianity because, likely, you were (as stated before) abused by fools by their particular practice of what they thought was “Christianity”.

I’m not here to “get you to see the light” by twisting your arm. You just keep on doing what your doing, and you’ll either figure out what this “God” thing is about, or not,… and deal with the God-given consequences accordingly. Best to you in that…! 🙂
that’s a perfectly sensible question you’ve posed there, chief. 🙂
and the answer?
Your question was: “whats the big deal all that ‘communion’ stuff anyway?

Communion DOESN’T make any sense to someone who doesn’t value others, in the sense that others are not “worthy” of communing with.

Communion, communing, is a give and take. If you’re only interested in “taking”, communion doesn’t happen, and therefore “playacting” communion is worthless.
Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
Minumura mo ba ako? Gago ka rin!
The translation of the olelo hawai’i is: Thanks be to God. May blessings always be with you. Great love to you.

What does yours translate to?

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
 
You’d give up ALL ideas not generated, or discovered, or revelealed to, by you because some ideas from others are “useless or worse”…?
thats part of the reason. the other reasons for not believing the ‘so called prophets’ (like moses, buddha, jesus, joseph smith, l.ron hubbard) is a combination of these three:
  • its not convincing enough.
  • its not proven enough.
  • it looks fake enough.
Hmmm,… how is that NOT about you, and your egocentrism?
it dont believe in hell.
You have a bad impression of Christianity because, likely, you were (as stated before) abused by fools by their particular practice of what they thought was “Christianity”.
I dont really have a bad impression of Christianity. In fact I like it. I would rather have all Muslims become Christians. Its just not for me. its too much like the matrix- nice but not real.
and acting on what that phrase actually meant.
so what does that phrase mean for you?

Communion DOESN’T make any sense to someone who doesn’t value others, in the sense that others are not “worthy” of communing with.

Communion, communing, is a give and take. If you’re only interested in “taking”, communion doesn’t happen, and therefore “playacting” communion is worthless.

communion is a very religious term. i value other people. if i just value myself then i wouldnt give a damn what muslims are doing because it does not affect me. no, i give a damn because i think islamization will retard human progress.
The translation of the olelo hawai’i is: Thanks be to God. May blessings always be with you. Great love to you.

What does yours translate to?
Oh ok. Mine says “Are you cursing me? Curse you too!” 😃

hey I was just playin. 😉
 
Don’t Muslims believe that sharia law is from God?? :rolleyes:

Vickie
Sharia comes from the Koran and Hadith
I think for them it’s inspired, and they have a ‘science of hadith’ to test whether particular incidents actually happened - because this shows the Koran in action, and is a guide for how to interpret the Koran.
 
Originally Posted by fatma View Post
not all muslims want sharia law, they support democracy and the australian way of life. they also find much of the middle eastern practises reprehensible.

If you really believe this they have you fooled!
Myself, ive been to a muslim wedding, dressed modestly as my friend requested, yet the sheik refused to walk past us cause we were considered ‘uncovered’. And yes, i had long pants on and a shirt that covered everything, except it displayed my forearm.
I then asked the question, how on earth does this man walk down the streets of sydney, especially in summer!!!:eek:
ALL and i repeat ALL muslims want sharia law, its what they believe.
fatma, im not being mean when i say this, but i think you should be doing more research for yourself, not asking muslims who lie, but your own research and you will then see the truth of what islam is.
As i said before, my own friend now lies to me to protect the religion she believes in, before, she would never lie to me.
Islam turns people into liars and makes them devious.
I might be harsh in some of my statements, but quite frankly, im sick and tired of watching Islam spread lies about Jesus, he is the son of God, not a mere prophet.
I dont regret anything I say.
God Bless
Dolphy
 
Fatma,… this is the whole point. Moslems are “allowed” (by “islam”) to believe that it’s OK to NOT believe in a commandment of God, according to “islam”.

Is that inherently psychopathic, or what?

Moslems, as individual persons, are free to believe as they wish. They have no central authority.

You call non-sharia-believing-moslems MOSLEMS.

Sharia-believing-moslems call them NON-MOSLEMS.

Sharia-believing-moslems have a punishment for non-moslems, and an especially harsh one for non-moslem moslems, such as non-sharia-believing non-moslems who call themselves moslems.

Since we’re (non-sharia-believing-humanity) put in the position of being constantly threatened by sharia-believing-moslems, should we not perhaps be “on guard” against those who threaten to do us harm?

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
I am not really clear about sharia law, i think it simply means following islam. When i said many don’t want sharia law in australia, i meant that having it as ‘the law’ in australia.I didn’t mean to suggest that they don’t believe in it because i think they have to ‘believe’ in it. Muslims such as HT want it to be established in muslim countries and don’t regard SA (or any other middle eastern countries) as a true islamic state. It is regarded as much more than draconian punishments for evil doers which is the way it is always presented in the western media. Most muslims i know don’t support HT and their objectives at all, they are regarded as extreme and a group that always attracts controversy and tarnishes the image of the rest of the muslim population. This makes many muslims very angry and as does all the other islamist terrorists who they condemn vehemently but rarely are their voices heard. In australia, the people arrested and charged with terrorism offences have been outed by the muslim community who are just as appalled as anyone else that they would want to harm others and our way of life. The sort of rhethoric on this thread is just the thing that drives our communities apart and leads to mistrust and fear. Our best protection from terrorism is a united community that works together. Islam has been hijacked by the islamists and the west is buying into their agenda of fear which is exactly want they want. It alienates the entire muslim population which is bound to produce the vulnerable and angry people that then find islamism attractive. We are all responsible for our part in this situation.
 
“When the LORD your God brings you into the land where you are entering to possess it, and clears away many nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and stronger than you. And when the LORD your God delivers them before you and you defeat them, then you shall utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them and show no favor to them. (Deutronomy 7:1-2)

“When you approach a city to fight against it, you shall offer it terms of peace. If it agrees to make peace with you and opens to you, then all the people who are found in it shall become your forced labor and shall serve you. However, if it does not make peace with you, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it. When the LORD your God gives it into your hand, you shall strike all the men in it with the edge of the sword. Only the women and the children and the animals and all that is in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as booty for yourself; and you shall use the spoil of your enemies which the LORD your God has given you… Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an inheritance, you shall not leave alive anything that breathes (Deuteronomy 20:10-17)

Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves. (Numbers 31:17-18)

Even in the New Testament we read the following statements attributed to Jesus saying to his disciples:

“I tell you that to everyone who has, more shall be given, but from the one who does not have, even what he does have shall be taken away. But these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them in my presence. (Luke 19:26-27)

“Do not think that I have come to send peace on earth. I did not come to send peace, but a sword. I am sent to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law” (Matthew 10:34-35)

Muslims believe in all Prophets sent by Allah, and so do not misuse or misinterpret the religious texts of other faiths in order to defame them. Even in recent times, Muslims have and are facing genocidal campaigns in Bosnia, Kosova, Chechnia, Kashmir, and Palestine - but they have not questioned Judaism and Christianity. Such spirit needs to be reciprocated.
So,
I saw this posting and I am wondering about you. Your replies will give me a lot of information.
I am curious if you know why in the quotes above God says to do what He says to do. I will ask you about just two for now. If you know please respond. If you don’t thanks for reading.
(Deutronomy 7:1-2)
(Deuteronomy 20:10-17)

Thanking you ahead of time
pmmjpls
 
So,
I saw this posting and I am wondering about you. Your replies will give me a lot of information.
I am curious if you know why in the quotes above God says to do what He says to do. I will ask you about just two for now. If you know please respond. If you don’t thanks for reading.
(Deutronomy 7:1-2)
(Deuteronomy 20:10-17)

Thanking you ahead of time
pmmjpls
I have been taught that quotes from the bible can be misinterpreted and much reflects the culture of the times. We rely on theologians and priests to interpret such passages. Those quotes are out of context, i don’t need to understand them to know the essence of catholicism. The same can be said of islam. Many people were quoting from anti-islamic sites to say that it is a violent religion. I put that there because someone claimed that there is no passages in the bible that are open to misinterpretation. Muslims rely on sheiks to interpret the quoran just as catholics rely on theology.

Dolphinlove and Montalban, you two should get married!😃
Recall the outrage of the muslim community at sheik taj’s comments. he was not supported by them. he is now gone. For everyone else, he made comments in a mosque about uncovered women being akin to meat left out to tempt cats. He was loudly condemned for the comments by every tom, **** and harry, as well as every mohamed, ahmed and jamal. All the women had a lot to say also. He is no longer the mufti. Rather than being particular to muslims, these type of comments have been typical of an older generation of australians for years. The govenor general said similar and met the same fate as the sheik.
 
40.png
fatma:
Islam has been hijacked by the islamists
Oh no, not that old discredited chestnut again.

If the Islamists have hijacked Islam, what are they doing that Muhammad and the 4 Righteous Caliphs did not do?
 
Originally Posted by fatma View Post
not all muslims want sharia law, they support democracy and the australian way of life. they also find much of the middle eastern practises reprehensible.

If you really believe this they have you fooled!
Myself, ive been to a muslim wedding, dressed modestly as my friend requested, yet the sheik refused to walk past us cause we were considered ‘uncovered’. And yes, i had long pants on and a shirt that covered everything, except it displayed my forearm.
I then asked the question, how on earth does this man walk down the streets of sydney, especially in summer!!!:eek:
ALL and i repeat ALL muslims want sharia law, its what they believe.
fatma, im not being mean when i say this, but i think you should be doing more research for yourself, not asking muslims who lie, but your own research and you will then see the truth of what islam is.
As i said before, my own friend now lies to me to protect the religion she believes in, before, she would never lie to me.
Islam turns people into liars and makes them devious.
I might be harsh in some of my statements, but quite frankly, im sick and tired of watching Islam spread lies about Jesus, he is the son of God, not a mere prophet.
I dont regret anything I say.
God Bless
Dolphy
If you think you can you universal statements about any group, including Muslims, then you have yourself fooled. You may find great agreement among most Muslims that they would like to see a world in which they could live under Sharia law. But it is false to say that all Muslims want to live under Sharia.

Also, just because your friend now lies to you does not mean that all Muslims would lie to you. It really can be that there are differences of opinion within Islam. Here are some differences:

  1. *]Sunni vs. Shia
    *]4 different schools of jurisprudence
    *]disagreements as to whether or not music is haraam
    *]some Muslims support militant jihad including what we would call terrorism as entirely justified and some oppose all militant forms of jihad that do harm to innocents, and they do not buy the arguement that there are no innocents in the western secularlized countries
    *]some are desperate for Sharia law and seek to make it worldwide, even in countries where Muslims are minorities, some would like to keep Sharia permanently sidelined even in countries that are nearly completely Muslim

    In an informal survery taken this past year, 73 persons, most of them Muslims, were asked to responded to the question, “Who wants to live in a theocracy?” 34% (including some Muslims) responded: “No, I want to live under a secular government.” Representative of this group is one by an American Muslim,
    I love living in a country with religious freedom, and where the LAWS aren’t based on any religion. Some politicians might be driven by religious motives, but that’s another story. I love the whole “melting pot” idea that we have here in America. I wouldn’t have it any other way.
    Of course the majority of respondants were more in line with another American Muslim:
    I would want to live in a theocracy, provided it is of my religious belief.
    However, wants and reality are not always the same. With that said living in a secular state is a workable alternative.
    There were other, and for me unexpected, viewpoints as well, such as this from a Malaysian Muslim:
    Hmmmmm… if it’s a theocratic Islamic or Christian or whtever religion country … I’ll abide to the rules … and as long I’ve have happiness, peaceful and prosperity with my life, job, religious practices and family … I would live in the country…
    In general, what I experience is that for every Muslim who has position “A” there seems to be another who holds to “not-A”. The more extreme position “A” is, the more likely to find an extreme form of “not-A” and many different positions in between.
 
MOHAMMAD DID WHAT…? (Violence recorded in the Hadith)

Jabir b. 'Abdullah reported that ***Allah’s Apostle ***(may peace be upon him) stoned (to death) a person from Banu Aslam, and a Jew and his wife. Book 017, Number 4216:

"The prophet (Mohammad) cut off the hands and feet of the men belonging to the tribe of Uraina and did not cauterize (their bleeding limbs) till they died". Sahih Al- Bukhair, Vol 8, Book 82, Hadith 795.

Narrated Jabir bin 'Abdullah: ***Allah’s Apostle said, “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” Thereupon Muhammad bin Maslama got up saying, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” The Prophet said, “Yes,” Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” The Prophet said, “You may say it.” ***(Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 59, Number 369)

Sira, p463-4: Then they {the tribe of Quraiza} surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of Bani al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina and dug trenches in it. ***Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy bin Akhtab and Kab bin Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. ***As they were being taken out in batches to the Apostle they asked Kab what he thought would be done with them. He replied, “Will you never understand? Don’t you see that the summoner never stops and those who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!” This went on until the Apostle made an end of them.

A series of letters Muhammad wrote to the rulers of the nations surrounding Arabia, calling them to his new faith. His letter to Heraclius, the Eastern Roman Emperor in Constantinople, is typical of this threat: ***“Now then, I invite you to Islam (i.e. surrender to Allah), embrace Islam and you will be safe: embrace Islam and Allah will bestow on you a double reward. But if you reject this invitation of Islam, you shall be responsible for misguiding the peasants (i.e. your nation).” ***(Mohammad Ibn Ismaiel al-Bukhari: The Translation of the meanings, vol.4 book 56, no. 2941, translated M.Khan (1997) –source ‘Religion of Peace by Robert Spencer (2007)

Great exemplar to the world as an ‘alleged’ last prophet for mankind!

DID JESUS COMMAND or COMMITT ANY OF THIS. yet what is critically important is that according to Allah himself (speaking through Muhammad via the Qur’an) Muhammad is the most “beautiful pattern of conduct” and “example” for mankind to follow (Qur’an 33:21)
 
In an informal survery taken this past year, 73 persons, most of them Muslims, were asked to responded to the question, “Who wants to live in a theocracy?” 34% (including some Muslims) responded: “No, I want to live under a secular government.” Representative of this group is one by an American Muslim,

Of course the majority of respondants were more in line with another American Muslim:

There were other, and for me unexpected, viewpoints as well, such as this from a Malaysian Muslim:

In general, what I experience is that for every Muslim who has position “A” there seems to be another who holds to “not-A”. The more extreme position “A” is, the more likely to find an extreme form of “not-A” and many different positions in between.
Who did this survey?
 
Who did this survey?
It was just an simple poll on a Muslim internet forum. It has no scientific value.

What is important is that you emphasized ALL Muslims, and here is at least one Muslim who specifically said he prefers the form of government he has in the USA to living in a Muslim theocracy.

Here is what another said,
in today’s world a true Islamic theocracy is not possible, the next best choice would be a secular state.
Here is some more of the disagreement that exists between Muslims.
Postion “A”:
The punishment for apostasy (riddah) is well-known in Islaamic Sharee’ah. The one who leaves Islaam will be asked to repent by the Sharee’ah judge in an Islaamic country; if he does not repent and come back to the true religion, he will be killed as a kaafir and apostate, because of the command of the Prophet
Postion “not-A”:
This view that some have nowadays is really incorrect. I admit a lot profess this. But whats better proof. The Qur’an or humans who are know for flaws?
If the person goes against the community or country he lives in thats when its allowed. Otherwise the apostate is allowed to follow the faith he currently believes in. As it is between him and Allah.
And yet another said,
Im A Muslim But Id Prefer To Live In A Seculoar Government-because If I Was To Live Under A Country Imposing Islamic Law, Id Be Pretty Sure That Theyd Use The Religion To Control The Masses And To Enhance Their Power Over The Country. The Prob Is That Power Corrupts. At Least In A Secular Country The Governmet Isnt Using The Name Of Religion In Vein In Order To Justify Despicable Acts As The Taliban Did.
Check it out for yourself: islamicboard.com/ You will find all sorts of Muslims there. Some who tend to scare about how bad the US is and all things western (while of course living in the west, like England or the Netherlands, themselves) and others from the USA to Pakistan with much more moderate, even liberal views. Some are young students, some professionals. Some are new converts and others have been Muslim their whole life. Some will engage you in polite conversation and others will hardly listen they are talking so loud themselves. A lot like here. Although, slightly more polite.

The one thing you won’t find, is that you can say ALL Muslims about anything, except for their allegiance to the Qur’an.
 
Fatima,
I notice that you captalize neither Catholic or Muslim in your Religion profile. Does that mean you are really neither? If you are trying to be both how can that be? Since catholic, with a small ‘c’ means universal, did you mean to say that you are a universal Muslim? I know you can be Arab and Catholic since my son in law is one but I don’t see how you could be Catholic and Muslim since you would have to reject some of the teachings of one or both religions. If you have already explained this please point me to your explanation. :confused:
I am a CATHOLIC. I put that there as a joke in reference to the american minister who claims to be both. I will now remove it because I am sick of everyone asking me about it. Someone on here is going to have to EAT THEIR HATbecause they claimed that I was really a muslim. So please whoever it was eat your hat and post pictures on line
Fatma, while we are on the side issue of your listing your religion as “catholic muslim”, please allow me to say this. This isn’t meant as an attack, but you might wish to reconsider such a registration, even if your desire is to build a bridge between the two.

As the episcopal priest in Oregon is finding out, one can keep a foot in both worlds, but one cannot keep a heart in both worlds. Either we give our hearts and our faith to Jesus or we don’t. It doesn’t have anything to do with Islam, it has to do with the nature of Christ and his demands that he places on us.

Add to that that Islam feels the same way with regard to its practices (one of the reasons that you will find true Isalm rejecting the likes of bin Laden as being truly representative of Islam and writing of him to one another as a despoiler of true Islam). So it is that a person who is a Muslim cannot at the same time profess the Christian creeds and be a true follower of Islam. While it is possible to be a member of either faith and acknowledge that the other faith attempts to worship the same God, neither grants the possible that one can be a follower of both faiths at the same time. One must choose one faith or the other, and if a person cannot or will not then that individual really doesn’t belong to either.

Of course, I recognize that you may have listed such a thing not to truly identify your theology, but to make some other sort of statement. So, I don’t share the above in the way of chastisement. It appears that you have gotten the attention of many. Having done so, you might now take advantage of that attention to clarify the sort of statement you were trying to make for those who find it confusing.
As you probably know Grace Seeker, I am sympathetic to the muslim community in this time of suspicion and distrust, and you are right, i am not a follower of both faiths and I didn’t think that that would attract such attention. It is frustrating the bejesus out of me as the irish say, to keep being asked about it.
Now you’ve got me very interested indeed…!

Please tell us, or just me, if you like, EXACTLY why this thread has shaken your belief in Catholics.

PLEASE please please don’t leave such a “provocative” statement as you’ve made naked to rampant interpretation, and tell us precisely what you mean by what you’ve said.

Thanks VERY much in advance for your continued conversation, which I’m not expecting you to continue with, but which would be nice to share with you.

Best to you, Fatma…

Mahalo ke Akua…!
E pili mau na pomaikai ia oe. Aloha nui.
I was brought up by a family of turbo catholics, here, there, everywhere was a nun or a priest in the family, catholicism was central to the family identity. The message I got loud and clear was that a good catholic was someone that didn’t judge other people, was charitable and tried to see the good in everyone. I saw this in my uncle who was a priest, not in other members of the family. What I see on here is a total lack of respect for a whole group of people based on their religion which I didn’t expect from people who professed to be catholic.
Family members have told me about the discrimination they faced because they were catholic in australia in the 1930s. I recall being called a ‘dirty catholic’ by the public school kids in primary school. I find the rhethoric about muslims fairly similar although more sophisticated. They just happen to be the current scapegoated minority and it’s ok to say anything about them because of a group of criminals that justify their behaviour using their religion. I think the fear propagated by politicians and the media as a result of terrorism is designed to suit their own agenda. When we buy into it we are poisoning ourselves.
 
As you probably know Grace Seeker, I am sympathetic to the muslim community in this time of suspicion and distrust, and you are right, i am not a follower of both faiths and I didn’t think that that would attract such attention. It is frustrating the bejesus out of me as the irish say, to keep being asked about it.
Simply amazing. “In this time of distrust”

Caused by…?

Moslems blowing people up.
:grouphug:
Yes, let’s all gather round for a group hug with our Moslem brothers who are only misunderstood.

I expect an apology to Moslems everywhere
 
I was brought up by a family of turbo catholics, here, there, everywhere was a nun or a priest in the family, catholicism was central to the family identity. The message I got loud and clear was that a good catholic was someone that didn’t judge other people, was charitable and tried to see the good in everyone. I saw this in my uncle who was a priest, not in other members of the family. What I see on here is a total lack of respect for a whole group of people based on their religion which I didn’t expect from people who professed to be catholic.
Family members have told me about the discrimination they faced because they were catholic in australia in the 1930s. I recall being called a ‘dirty catholic’ by the public school kids in primary school. I find the rhethoric about muslims fairly similar although more sophisticated. They just happen to be the current scapegoated minority and it’s ok to say anything about them because of a group of criminals that justify their behaviour using their religion. I think the fear propagated by politicians and the media as a result of terrorism is designed to suit their own agenda. When we buy into it we are poisoning ourselves.
The discrimination went both ways;
Catholics used to taunt Protestants as they passed by the school-playground

“Catholics! Catholics! Ring the bells,
whilst the Protestants go to hell”

When a Catholic married a non-Catholic, the kids had to be raised as Catholics - I know because my Presbyterian mum married my Catholic step-dad when I was 4 and suddenly I had to be Catholic.

You could drive into a country town and know which was the Anglican church and which was the Catholic church just by its position relevant to the town. Anglican churches had the better spot - Catholic ones often by the river - and prone to be washed away in flood, or somewhere on the outskirts of town.

None of the above is anywhere near like the Dhimmi status placed upon non-Moslems in Islam.

Islam is under the spotlight now, because it put itself there. The head of the largest mosque here in Sydney called women meat. He did this himself. When it was reported it was because he made it news.

Compare two incidents to judge character.
Same Mufti is pulled over by police for having an un-registered car. He collapses to the ground claiming police picking on him, later threatens to sue the police for harrassment.

Cardinal Pell, senior Catholic in Australia is accused of molestation of a man (when that man was a boy). He steps aside until an investigation happens. No evidence found. He steps back into his position and says he forgives the man who did this to him.

The degree between both charges was immense. One met the charge with good grace and (Christian) virtue. The other never forgave the police for doing their job.

Even this non-Catholic found new respect for the person of George Pell.

You’ve simply showing you’ve got no grasp on the difference betweeen discrimination as suffered here in Australia and that suffered under Islam. It’s a monumental difference of degree.

Even discrimination *against *Moslems here, bad as it is, is not as bad as that suffered by Chrisitans in Islamic nations.
 
Compare other incidents…

Christians in Victoria have a meeting for other Christians on Islam. Some recent converts to Islam sneak in and listen into these talks. They then take Catch the Fire Ministries to court for racial vilification. They have the backing of the Victorian government in this case.

A mufti in Western Sydney said that women who dress ‘provocatively’ *deserve *to be raped. No action.

The grand mufti of Lakemba makes his ‘meat’ comparison with women. No action.

Companies here bend over backwards to have their products declared halal, and have to pay for this… which the companies would take as a cost to pass on to all consumers, including the majority of them - non-Moslems. The Moslem community use this money to their own ends and demand very frequent re-assessments of what’s halal. There’s been suggestions this money goes overseas to finance operations there.

Thus, for instance I want to buy Cadbury Dairy Milk chocolate, I know some of the cost is to subsidise Moslem events.

Further to the above post, George Pell, and Christians in general are lampooned by the popular press. TV shows such as “The Glass House” love to make fun of Christians.

Recently a series of art works were shown, that were blasphemous.

If they did the same about Islam then there’d no doubt be riots, threats of violence and people like you saying “They’re just reacting to provocation” or “They’re not representative of most Moslems I KNOW”:rolleyes:
 
The discrimination went both ways;
Catholics used to taunt Protestants as they passed by the school-playground

“Catholics! Catholics! Ring the bells,
whilst the Protestants go to hell”

When a Catholic married a non-Catholic, the kids had to be raised as Catholics - I know because my Presbyterian mum married my Catholic step-dad when I was 4 and suddenly I had to be Catholic.

You could drive into a country town and know which was the Anglican church and which was the Catholic church just by its position relevant to the town. Anglican churches had the better spot - Catholic ones often by the river - and prone to be washed away in flood, or somewhere on the outskirts of town.

None of the above is anywhere near like the Dhimmi status placed upon non-Moslems in Islam.

Islam is under the spotlight now, because it put itself there. The head of the largest mosque here in Sydney called women meat. He did this himself. When it was reported it was because he made it news.

Compare two incidents to judge character.
Same Mufti is pulled over by police for having an un-registered car. He collapses to the ground claiming police picking on him, later threatens to sue the police for harrassment.

Cardinal Pell, senior Catholic in Australia is accused of molestation of a man (when that man was a boy). He steps aside until an investigation happens. No evidence found. He steps back into his position and says he forgives the man who did this to him.

The degree between both charges was immense. One met the charge with good grace and (Christian) virtue. The other never forgave the police for doing their job.

Even this non-Catholic found new respect for the person of George Pell.

You’ve simply showing you’ve got no grasp on the difference betweeen discrimination as suffered here in Australia and that suffered under Islam. It’s a monumental difference of degree.

Even discrimination *against *Moslems here, bad as it is, is not as bad as that suffered by Chrisitans in Islamic nations.
you’re not a catholic then, you’ll have to become one when you marry dolphinlove then:) and i’m not going to defend sheik taj - i think he was a liability to the muslim community in some ways. I didn’t say anything about christians in islamic countries, why do you think that justifies the way we treat people?:harp:

anyway portestants do go to hell :amen:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top