Hansen: Are you saying that the Lord Jesus Christ’s death, burial and resurrection is not the gospel by which one is saved in this dispensation of the grace of God [1 Cor 15:1-5; Eph. 3:2]? Paul calls it the “gospel which I preached unto you, which also you have received, and in which ye stand; BY WHICH ALSO YE ARE SAVED…” Further, Paul writes that “In whom ye trusted, after ye heard the GOSPEL OF YOUR SALVATION; in whom also AFTER YE BELIEVED, YE WERE SEALED WITH THE HOLY SPIRIT OF PROMISE.” [Eph. 1:13].
The problem with your doctrine, IMO, is that it means that God’s no longer concerned with who man is, but rather with who man is imputed to be. He’s no longer concerned with mans being righteous-a righteousness that comes from Him-but solely with mans faith. And while ‘the righteous man shall live by faith’, this is in no way meant to imply that the righteous man need not be truly righteous-as if faith, alone, could somehow provide a substitute for our righteousness.
And this errant doctrine introduces an evil, IMO, because since the beginning of mankind God has been working to restore order, to restore justice, to restore
righteousness to a creation which fell by man *willingly *rebelling against His perfect order. And since man’s will is the problem, God’s purpose is to help man willingly rise again, to the degree he can. This is Gods’ perfect world-where creation actually aligns itself with His will after seeing-
knowing-the evil that befalls us when we reject the good that He is, like the Prodigal returning home.
And I might agree that you’ve probably correctly discerned the intended message of a centuries-old book (although intentions are difficult enough to discern in written material even when the book doesn’t involve spiritual realities) if it weren’t for the fact that there are so many other verses in the bible emanating from Jesus, Paul, and others that squarely place the onus on ourselves to strive, to persevere, to keep oil in our lamps, invest our talents, be perfect, be holy, be righteous, etc. with dire consequences if we don’t.
Now none of this takes anything away from the work of Jesus because no salvation is possible without Him. That’s the point-‘with man nothing is possible, with God all things are possible’; even making man truly righteous is possible. And why not? -God never intended man to sin to begin with.
So the message of the New Covenant is not that God suddenly changed His mind and no longer cares about whether or not man is righteous. The message is that mans’ righteousness was always meant to come from and through his creator, God, himself. Only a direct, indwelling communion with his creator can keep man from sin. This is the lesson that man must learn: simply that he needs God. IOW,
man doesn’t need to fulfill the Law in order to have relationship with God, rather man must have relationship with God in order to fulfill the Law. And the Atonement makes this relationship possible again.
Then God can place a new heart in man, then God can write His Laws on our hearts and in our minds as per Jer 31, becoming the God of man, individually, again, enabling man to fulfill the greatest commandments, enabling man to see God, which is really the meaning of the term “heaven”. Scripture tells us that no sinners will enter heaven. Of course they won’t -sin and heaven, sin and love, sin and God are mutually exclusive-because, in the end, sin is actually the rejection of God after all. And this is why the CC is adamant that we must have no attachments to anything other than Him first and foremost, i.e. attachments to sin, in order to enter heaven. Our sins are forgiven, but we must go, and sin no more.