D
ddarko
Guest
You too my friend. Keep in touch!I look forward to it. Thank you. God bless you.
God Bless
You too my friend. Keep in touch!I look forward to it. Thank you. God bless you.
As the author of “the reply” I must wonder, based on the above, if you mis-read my reply, Pat. Did you think I said Grace is NOT always sufficient?Now as for the REPLY
Grace is always “sufficient” is COMPLETELY True WHEN correctly understood.
The Church teaches the truth, but sometimes her methods were inadequate…If the following statment is true:
(NB: it’s probably not your fault that you are so poorly catechized. The Church has done an abysmal job in the past feeding her flock with the truth.)
How can you then state:
“The church is “the pillar and foundation of truth” -1 Tim 3:15”
**Seems like a contradiction to me. **Hmmmm… Now what shall I believe?
Don’t worry, I don’t want an answer I already know.
All truth comes from fallible men*, pesce, unless you want to proclaim that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were infallible?So,
How do we aquire this truth then? How do we know it is the truth if it is coming from fallible men?
Now, this is very Catholic of you to say, pesce!Maybe I should say…
It must be in agreement with the bible.
If it goes against the teachings of the bible it can’t come from God. God would never contradict Himself.
I like the way you sneak your jabs in, “as evidenced by your poor catechesis”, or “pesce” when my handle is “fpesce”. Is that something you learn from catchesis? OR maybe the bible? Or the Catholic Church? Or is it just a woman thing.The Church teaches the truth, but sometimes her methods were inadequate…
as evidenced by your poor catechesis. And the fact that you would make the above statement about a contradiction where none exists.
QED.
“so that we may no longer be infants, tossed by waves and swept along by every wind of teaching arising from human trickery, from their cunning in the interests of deceitful scheming”.–Ephesians 4:14.
Oh, and thanks for visiting my Profile Page. It makes me happy to see your curiosity about me.![]()
Oh! I meant no insult by calling you “pesce”. Now that I know you don’t care for it, may i call you fp?I like the way you sneak your jabs in, “as evidenced by your poor catechesis”, or “pesce” when my handle is “fpesce”. Is that something you learn from catchesis? OR maybe the bible? Or the Catholic Church? Or is it just a woman thing.
Hmmm, very christian of you.
You want a great (I mean great!!!) text for Logic (reasoning)?: Socratic Logic, by Peter Kreeft. I tell you, an 8th grader can read it and understand it. It is one of the text that I live with; it is like the Catechism and bible to me. It (in my opinion) should be with you all the times.Well, perfecting reasoning can be done through philosophy, mathematics etc. It takes a bit of practice because its very easy to fall in to circular logic and think one is done. Also as you mature, your reasoning skills grow. After you accept Christianity, you can also pray to the Holy Spirit to give you the grace of Wisdom, Understanding and Knowledge. There are times when I don’t immediately understand Church teaching. Then I pray and after years, it dawns on me. In all that time, I still stay faithful to the teaching. And that is the peace of being Catholic. You don’t always see the reasons. But know you can trust in the Church because you’ve already arrived at it by Reason.
Think about all the early Christians. They probably never knew the reasons behind the teachings of St. Paul or St. Peter. Yet they believed. That was because they knew that the only REASONABLE thing to do if they wanted to follow Christ was to believe what his Apostles are teaching.
It is a bit of work, but one has to do a bit of searching to reach Christ especially in the modern world where there are so many “alternatives” that try to portray themselves as the “true God”. In all of this, your personal experience keeps you grounded that you have to seek Christ and not these things. That is why the personal experience aspect is VERY important to keep you steady as you strive to find Christ’s teachings.
But one thing you have to remember is that not everyone has to go through this process of logical analysis all the time. Let us say you were born to a Catholic family. It is possible that your parents, or your parents parents etc somewhere down the line did this analysis and accepted the faith. So since they know God’s promises and has faith in him, they baptize you. You in turn would do the same because you trust your parents to have done the analysis. And that is how faith was handed down from the early Church. Through Apostles to Parents, then to child and so on through trust. The problem only occurs when one of the baptized starts to have doubts or gets met with an objection. Then he/she needs to redo the analysis.
Especially in the time we live in, with so many non-believers and even Christians who would ask questions and go down wrong paths, it’s important to know the way so that you can share it with them and bring them to Christ’s teachings with certainty.
To give you an example, if your parents said you have a brother who died before you were born, then you would believe them because you trust them. But then if you hear stuff from other people that it’s false, then you actually start to investigate and see if its true. It’s something similar here.
God Bless![]()
You laid out the truth of the gospel quite throuroughlyCan I ask… What/who is the object of our worship (attention, adoration etc)? If we can play any part in our salvation by influencing God’s decision then we are not dead in sin, we have a righteousness of our own & we are placing our trust & worship in ourselves and our own abilities - rather than rightly giving the glory & worship to Jesus.*
Concerning salvation, anything we have to add (works) to Jesus death is a minus from Jesus (taking away glory richly deserved by him alone), and so sinfully puts us at the helm under us which God must somehow act because we bought him at a price… (I hope you can see that it doesn’t work that way!)
*God is God over us (and not the other way around) and is not bent to us and our good doing - we cannot buy-off God with works, doing good, penance, buying someone out of some purgetory with our prayers, being religious, or going to church. God bought us at a price, the price of his son Jesus.
Don’t agree yet? Then let’s take a works based salvation further to see it’s implications… Works is a natural logical idea, we want to contribute something… It is the basis of Catholisism, Islam, Hinduism, etc. Do good & God will do good to you essentially in it’s simplest form. *It is of noblest intent - God cannot accept sin because he is holy, so what am I going to do about my sin? So we attempt to become righteous - right with God, and to present this to God when Jesus Christ comes again, hoping that it’ll impress him. *The bible concerning our righteousness says that God views our righteousness as like filthy menstrual rags (Isaiah 54:6), or a steaming pile (Phil3:8). So we bring our resume of works (our steaming pile) to God, asking if he is impressed. Ah…hem…
“Look at my resume God, I have been so much better than that Tax collector (or maybe Pimp in our culture) over there…” (pride & comparing to another). *If God was impressed we’d have a reason to boast! Who does this boasting glorify? Who does it worship? Wow, I wanna be like that guy…
Works righteousness is unrighteousness because it is man centered… Why? - Luke 18:9 amongst other things…
So if our steaming pile of own righteousness is offensive to God. What then is the alternative? - It’s Jesus.
- We compare ouselves to other people not Jesus
- performance establishes worth, not God saves me, loves me etc
- we trust in ourselves - object as our faith
- God not our judge, people are
- Leads to pride (call it self esteem) who do we have contempt for?
(thanks Mark Driscoll podcasted sermon).
Religion has glory & worship going to everyone or anything else EXCEPT Jesus. God hates religion!
Catholics would be right in saying that we’re saved by works, but whose works? Whose works save? - Jesus not ours!- his life not ours, his perfection not ours, his obedience not ours, his death in our place. It’s been done 4 us in Jesus!
Like the tax collector in Luke 18, we repent and receive what? GIFT righteousness!
If we indeed receive as a gift Jesus righteousness as the bible says we do, then wow!
It is all Jesus that makes us right with God, then wow, what hope we have, what certainty of heaven we have, what we have to live in thankfulness for! Our life-long worship is then to Jesus (instead of pride for self-purchasing of our salvation & influencing God to accept our efforts), we’re being changed to become more like Jesus by the gift of Holy Spirit given to us when we accept Jesus gift, and our imperfect worship/works is acceptable to God because of Jesus perfect worship!
Jesus paying the spiritual debt we can’t repay (we’re dead in sin too, dead people can’t do anything!), Jesus righteousness becoming ours, given an incredible inheritance with Jesus…
God’s unmerited & incredible love, mercy & grace shown to us is in such stark contrast to how Jim Dandy’s catholisism seems to come across because it is anything but logical! Why the heck would God do all that? Because he loves us.
Wow, what an incredible loving God!
If we truly have an inheritance with Jesus that the bible says we dothen I’m so looking forward to meeting our great & wonderful God!*
Like the tax collector in Luke 18 we need to come empty handed & ask for God’s gift of grace, and we will receive it! Wow, thanks God!
So who do you put trust in? Jesus or yourself for salvation. One choice rightly directs worship to the one who deserves it, the other directs it to ourselves (and creates pride).
Jesus said it is finished - all the work has been done!
But hang on, so how do we reconcile works? If they cannot save us because our best righteousness is as offensive to God as a steaming pile, then why would/should we do them?
We change because Jesus Christ offered his perfect life, perfect worship, and we want to be like this wonderful Jesus. Because God is, we want to be. *We are thankful for such incredible mercies extended to us that are completely undeserved! Our motivation is JOY not a bunch of have toos!*Not saved by works but TO our good works! Big difference! We have the promise that the Holy Spirit will be with us, that God will make us more like Jesus, conforming us to be like him!
If we say we have faith but aren’t being changed (even slowly) into someone who wants to do more works, then we’ve not got our faith in the right Jesus (James 2). *The Holy Spirit will convict us of sin, sin that has been entirely paid for by Jesus. Thanks God for your mercy, grace, & gift of your HS!
This is nonsense. The only way you know who Jesus reprimanded is through…You laid out the truth of the gospel quite throuroughlyI’d like to add a few notes. Who did Jesus repremand? Was it the sinners? Nope. It was the religious leaders. So yes, God doesn’t go for religion.
I need to reword that. Who did Jesus come down the hardest on. The religious leaders, not the sinners. Of course he didn’t condone sin in the sinners but he didn’t call them vipers and empty whitewashed tombs. It was the religious leaders that got all fired up to have him killed, not the sinners.This is nonsense. The only way you know who Jesus reprimanded is through…
wait for it…
wait for it…
religion!
The *Catholic * religion, as a matter of fact.
For it was the Catholic religion which codified and preserved these words and actions of Jesus so that you would know that Jesus reprimanded sinners–including religious leaders.
Indeed.I need to reword that. Who did Jesus come down the hardest on. The religious leaders, not the sinners. Of course he didn’t condone sin in the sinners but he didn’t call them vipers and empty whitewashed tombs. It was the religious leaders that got all fired up to have him killed, not the sinners.
Neh. 13:14, Psalm 11:7,28:4, Isa. 3:10, 59:18, Jer. 25:14, 50:29, Ezek. 9:10, 11:21, 36:19, Hos. 4:9, 9:15, 12:2, Sir. 16:12,14 - The 2,000 year-old Catholic position on salvation is that we are saved by Jesus Christ and Him alone (cf. Acts 15:11; Eph. 2:5). But by the grace of Christ, we achieve the salvation God desires for us through perseverance in both faith and works. Many Protestants, on the other hand, believe that one just has to accept Jesus as personal Lord and Savior to be saved, and good works are not necessary (they just flow from those already saved). But these verses, and many others, teach us that our performance of good works is necessary for our salvation. Scripture also does not teach that good works distinguish those who are eternally saved from those who are not saved.I would like to be clear on a few things. The CC objects to saying we are not saved by faith alone and use Romans 3 :28 to subtantiate this by saying Paul never said we are saved by faith alone. Is there other scripture as well?
The object of all Catholics’ faith ought to be Jesus, Leadee. That is a teaching of the CC.While the church is very important, my faith is not in the church because it has failed at times even since the beginning of it’s existence. The object of my faith is Jesus. He can never fail. It seems like a no brainer to me.
“above statement about a contradiction where none exists.”The Church teaches the truth, but sometimes her methods were inadequate…
as evidenced by your poor catechesis. And the fact that you would make the above statement about a contradiction where none exists.
QED.
“so that we may no longer be infants, tossed by waves and swept along by every wind of teaching arising from human trickery, from their cunning in the interests of deceitful scheming”.–Ephesians 4:14.
Oh, and thanks for visiting my Profile Page. It makes me happy to see your curiosity about me.![]()
Holy cow!!! Fpesce! do you understand what is ment by the church being infallible? I understand you are a Catholic? Someone else on this sight can explain it better than I. Please read you Catechism.“above statement about a contradiction where none exists.”
You say the church is infallible, then in the next statement show it has faults, so then how can it be infallible?
By the way is this what you mean with “QED”?
QED as in:
Originally Latin meaning “quod erat demonstrandum” or “which was to be shown or proven”, now used mainly to insult someone when something is proven wrong or false
But no matter, I don’t concern myself with insults. God bless you ALWAYS! And you may call me, “fp”, “pesce”, whatever you please.
As you wish.And you may call me, “fp”, “pesce”, whatever you please.
You clearly have great ignorance about what infallible means. It does NOT mean that the Church is perfect, impeccable or has no faults.You say the church is infallible, then in the next statement show it has faults, so then how can it be infallible?
By the way is this what you mean with “QED”?
I was using more in the sense of “there, I’ve proved it!” rather than an insult, pesce.QED as in:
Originally Latin meaning “quod erat demonstrandum” or “which was to be shown or proven”, now used mainly to insult someone when something is proven wrong or false
Yes. It is clear that many Catholics are uninformed about their own Church’s teachings. :sad_yes:Holy cow!!! Fpesce! do you understand what is ment by the church being infallible? I understand you are a Catholic? Someone else on this sight can explain it better than I. Please read you Catechism.