What percentage of Protestant theology is based on the Bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bettercallpaul
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No I didn’t; it’s essentially what we’ve been asking and what you’ve refused to answer. You just keep changing the wording of the question. So in this case:

Who decides who’s validly baptized?

Oneness Pentecostals? Mormons?
I thought all Catholics read scripture. Have you read the great commission?
 
40.png
rcwitness:
So they claim to be able to make an infallible declaration? Both the doctrine of Sola scriptura and the Canon?
I think most would say that "infallible " is a claim one bishop makes for himself, quite honestly. So, no. While I can’t speak for anyone but me, I don’t think they would say that.
You see, the Catholic Church never claimed Scripture to be the independant rule of faith, so she never relied on a Canon as Sola Scripturists would. Yet, Sola Scripturists are unable to refer to an eccumenical council which declared a body of Scripture so that Sola Scriptura has a foundation. We can know our Canon of Scripture because it rests on the foundation of Church authority to decree.
Well, they Gould refer to councils. Lutherans do it a lot. There’s no inconsistency in doing so.
they actually take a rather conservative view, that being to evaluate books based on how the early Church and Fathers did.
So, again, it seems a futile effort to group “sola scripturists” or "Protestants " as s single monolith
No doubt they referred to councils. But those councils were unable to bind the whole Church, right? So how can local Churches claim Scripture as the highest rule of faith without the whole Church first declaring a canon?

You see the dilemma?

The whole Church did not affirm a canon in an eccumenical council, yet small groups hundreds of years removed took what the Apostolic Churches declared, and established it as a rule higer than other pronouncements those Churches made.
 
Line of succession. I think you know how that works
“But if there be any [heresies] which are bold enough to plant [their origin] in the midst of the apostolic age, that they may thereby seem to have been handed down by the apostles, because they existed in the time of the apostles, we can say: Let them produce the original records of their churches; let them unfold the roll of their bishops, running down in due succession from the beginning in such a manner that [their first] bishop shall be able to show for his ordainer and predecessor some one of the apostles or of apostolic men—a man, moreover, who continued steadfast with the apostles. For this is the manner in which the apostolic churches transmit their registers: as the church of Smyrna, which records that Polycarp was placed therein by John; as also the church of Rome, which makes Clement to have been ordained in like manner by Peter” - Tertullian (Demurrer Against the Heretics 32 [A.D. 200])

Can you produce the original records of your churches? Can you unfold the roll of your bishops, running down in due succession from the beginning?
 
40.png
Vonsalza:
No I didn’t; it’s essentially what we’ve been asking and what you’ve refused to answer. You just keep changing the wording of the question. So in this case:

Who decides who’s validly baptized?

Oneness Pentecostals? Mormons?
I thought all Catholics read scripture. Have you read the great commission?
Ok, I think we both know that wasn’t an answer…

Nice chat, Jon.
 
To be fair, Jon was addressing several people and providing reasonable answers to all.

He is one of my favorite Non-Catholic Christians on this forum. He has very orthodox faith. I think he lacks very little to agree with everything we profess, which is alot more than we can say for the majority of Catholics!
 
He is one of my favorite Non-Catholic Christians on this forum. He has very orthodox faith. I think he lacks very little to agree with everything we profess, which is alot more than we can say for the majority of Catholics!
100% agreed! I commend him for being charitable! 🙂
providing reasonable answers to all
I respectfully disagree.
 
Ok, I think we both know that wasn’t an answer…
Maybe the problem was the question.
The Didache:
Chapter 7. Concerning Baptism. And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. But if you have no living water, baptize into other water; and if you cannot do so in cold water, do so in warm. But if you have neither, pour out water three times upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. But before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whoever else can; but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before.
 
I know that you are not kidding, so I will not ask. The entire Church? Where is that in scripture?
22When he had said this, he breathed on them; and he said to them: Receive ye the Holy Ghost. 23Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained.

Those disciples were,essentially, the first priests of the Church. Here they were given the power to bind and loose.
 
No doubt they referred to councils. But those councils were unable to bind the whole Church, right? So how can local Churches claim Scripture as the highest rule of faith without the whole Church first declaring a canon?

You see the dilemma?
Local Churches have for over a millennium. What hasn’t happened is a Universally agreed upon canon.
There are other issues, as well, including the different usages of the term canon.
I would be all in favor of a universal canon.
The whole Church did not affirm a canon in an eccumenical council, yet small groups hundreds of years removed took what the Apostolic Churches declared, and established it as a rule higer than other pronouncements those Churches made.
The problem is the Apostolic sees have never agreed on a canon. Ever. And some of the Church Fathers explicitly rejected some of the books all of us view as canon.
I’d love to hear a solution.
 
But the Anglicans altered the ordination rite! 1633 was it? By whose authority did they do that?

You are getting closer and closer. May I live long enough (and suffer enough) that I see you come home.
 
Yeah, i know that the Canon is something that doesnt have universal agreement.

But thats why i dont understand how modern Churches can cling to Sola Scriptura, when God did not provide a universal Canon independant of Church authority.

At least the Catholic Church professes and practices a universal authority! We can say that we have the ability to declare a Canon with binding power! We can say we have the ability to declare what the Sacred Tradition of this passage or that passage is! And it is based on a Tradition that exists within Scripture, and attested to from the earliest of days, even though it met resistance throughout the ages as well.

All Sacred Tradition has met resistance and rejection at some point.
 
But thats why i dont understand how modern Churches can cling to Sola Scriptura, when God did not provide a universal Canon independant of Church authority.
Because they make a determination as a communion to
At least the Catholic Church professes and practices a universal authority! We can say that we have the ability to declare a Canon with binding power! We can say we have the ability to declare what the Sacred Tradition of this passage or that passage is! And it is based on a Tradition that exists within Scripture, and attested to from the earliest of days, even though it met resistance throughout the ages as well.
This is true. And the EO seems have a similar view
 
Guess I need to upgrade my understanding of the various wings of Protestantism. Thanks.
 
But the Anglicans altered the ordination rite! 1633 was it? By whose authority did they do that?
Apparently Anglicans of the time did not consider this an issue. But even if it were, the "infusion " of Dutch Old Catholic lines in the early 1930’s would have solved that.
Let’s face it: Anglicans do not get to tell Rome who is or isn’t valid, or the reverse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top