My daughter was given a King James Bible several years ago by a protestant who was trying to convert her.
I just found it and would like to know who I could give it to. It is not the complete Bible and I really have no need to keep it.
I would like to give it to some protestant organization, but don’t know who that would be.
It is the word of God although incomplete and I surely can’t just toss it out.
Thanks for any suggestions. Bernadette
Hello Bernadette,
Better to learn the difference’s than to ban the Book, Learn about them so that you can go back to that Protestant friend with some answers.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement
James R. White, wrote a book called ‘The King James Only Controversy’
christianbook.com/Christian/Books/product?item_no=206054&item_code=WW&netp_id=558428&event=ESRCN&view=details#curr
He explains a few things, i.e the original KJV included the Deuterocanonical s, The printers of the KJV Bibles later asked if the books were not necessary, if they could leave them out, Why? they could print Bibles with less pages, thus making them smaller and cheaper to print.
2nd) todays version of the KJV is the 1789 version, it took 160 yrs to get most of the errors out of it.
30 the ‘textus receptus’ which they swear by, because the 70 KJV translators used it primarily was written in the 16th Century, By a Roman Catholic named Erasmus, he translated the Latin Vulgate back to the Greek and Hebrew as best he could… he never meant it to be something as absolute, in fact most of the ancient Manuscripts were unavailable to him at the time.
Before reading James R. White’s book had to learn this, to stop a Jehovah Witness in their tracks
there is the 1John 5:8 verse, controversy, it really doesn’t belong in the Bible,
A Jehovah Witness will knock on your door, trying to fool you, with a KJV, and then try to confuse you by getting you to think, well what else was added in? All you do is break out your NAB, NASB and show them, there knocking on the wrong door and why.
the simple answer is does this addition change your faith? No!
But they’ll take it elsewhere
Some scholars insisted that Erasmus include that verse in his ‘Textus Receptus’ but his argument for leaving it out was he could not find in in any ancient MSS available to him, well theses scholars are said to (maybe producing a ms with it in there) Erasmus simply agreed. The Truth is that it doesn’t belong there!! It’s not in any Catholic Bible, it may appear in the footnote, but not in the text!
Where did it come from? A Priscillian Monk who was a staunch Trinitarian, added that verse to his Vulgates, the RCC got wind of it and burned(so they thought) every Bible which contained the added in vs. Somehow a few of these Vulgates were still around, during the printing of the KJV… it doesn’t change the fact it was added in, and wasn’t in most of the oldest Mss.
On the Good side, the KJV authors tried to keep the poetic beat and meter, of the original Hebrew, they sacrificed some words to do that, but that’s why it is so easily memorized, it is also one of the greatest literary books of all time.
You can get KJV’s with the Deuterocanonicals included as a compromise!
Check out this list of Bible vss not included in Modern Translations versus the KJV:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_omitted_Bible_verses
God bless,
John
