What's an Illinois voter to do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lrning
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You are right about electing the Governor and Lt. Governor together.

However, I do have a Lt. Governor running mate, Randy White. I couldn’t be more pleased with a running mate than I am with Randy. You can find out more about him from the website:

runrandyrun.com/RandyWhite
Thank you for that information.
I will take it into the polls with me…don’t know what my ballot looks like, but if there’s a line I will use your name and Randy Whites…I believe it is the only way both main parties will know what you stood for mattered more than what they had to offer, and that’s a vote worth placing.
 
You are right about electing the Governor and Lt. Governor together.

However, I do have a Lt. Governor running mate, Randy White. I couldn’t be more pleased with a running mate than I am with Randy. You can find out more about him from the website:

runrandyrun.com/RandyWhite
You will have my vote. I am sick of politics as usual in Illinois. It is time for a change. I hold out no hope of a write in candidate winning, however I am ready to make a statement. I am certain that Blago will win, but I am sick of Illinois and it’s corruption and people’s acceptance of it. After all, it is the norm right? Sickening!
 
I keep reflecting on Drew Mariani’s show…the two positions of the priests - one which says vote the lesser of evils based upon who would do the least harm and the one which says never vote against the non-negotiables.

Both priests cite the same Bishop documents for their position.
Both priests acknowledge each priest’s practice based on their interpretation of the documents is acceptable by the Church’s moral teachings.
Both priest say the real answer lies in finding and financially supporting politicians which uphold Catholic moral teachings.

Here in Illinois we have one such brave soul.
He didn’t get on the ballot, but since the Bishops documents clearly address the need to find and support moral candidates then I feel the best I can do in this situation is to at least back the morally conscious candidates - even if they have no chance of winning.

Thank you, Mr. Stufflebeam for providing this Catholic voter with a conscienable option this election. 🙂
 
You will have my vote. I am sick of politics as usual in Illinois. It is time for a change. I hold out no hope of a write in candidate winning, however I am ready to make a statement. I am certain that Blago will win, but I am sick of Illinois and it’s corruption and people’s acceptance of it. After all, it is the norm right? Sickening!
I was of the opinion that the state quarter ought to have featured a dollar sign with a hand grasping at it, a politician behind bars, and our motto “Where’s Mine?”
 
Geez…how odd…
I’m a transplant from CA…10 years in IL is just scratching the surface of the political process here but I must say I find it very confusing compared to what I grew up with. The lack of information about candidates is astounding compared to CA where one is bombarded with daily postcards/pamphlets and what nots - not just from the parties but from all those PACs and organizations. Here it’s just dismal…even the hype is absent. Money for TV ads just isn’t being spent where I am because I’m not in Chicago or a large suburb.

Anyway, thanks for the (name removed by moderator)ut. Sure will be interesting how this all turns out.
You can get some information on voting proceedures via the Illinois State Board of Elections and your county clerk or election board:

elections.il.gov/

Many organizations provide their own voters guides based upon their interests. But you kind of have to find out about these groups and sign up as they might not find you.
 
I was of the opinion that the state quarter ought to have featured a dollar sign with a hand grasping at it, a politician behind bars, and our motto “Where’s Mine?”
Yep, it was Royko’s view of what our state seal should be, an open hand out with a pinky ring on it and the motto, Ubi Est Mea on it.

Ubi Est Mea being where’s mine classed up by putting it in Latin.
 
The lack of information about candidates is astounding
Perhaps money isn’t being spent because it is a foregone conclusion how the election will turn out in certain areas. The money for the campaign would be wasted. After all, in many local races, the primary is the only real election.

I agree with another poster, though. Find an organization and get on their mailing list. You’ll get plenty of useless literature then. This election seems to be all about “I’m for education” in my area. Whatever. I’m sure they are all against crime, too.

I think many voters just vote for whomever the local paper endorses.
 
I think many voters just vote for whomever the local paper endorses.
A challenging situation for those in Chicago as the local papers (Sun Times and Trib) split, just about always picking opposites. And it really doesn’t seem to matter. They both picked W in 2004 and he lost IL by double digits.

In most election years, in most parts of the County of Cook, the real election is, indeed held in March. It’s one reason why the city of Chicago elections are non-partisan. I think if we extended that to suburban and county elections in County Cook, we’d see better races.
 
They both picked W in 2004 and he lost IL by double digits.
I’d guess endorsements don’t help with the Presidential election, but I could be wrong. I figure they work with coroner and the like. I know people who vote for those smaller races by using the paper almost exclusively. But having two strong competing papers would throw a monkey in the wrench. I don’t live in a big city, though. That could make all the difference.
 
A challenging situation for those in Chicago as the local papers (Sun Times and Trib) split, just about always picking opposites.
Well, traditionally, the Trib was the North Shore Republican rag and the Sun-Times was the South Side Democratic City News. So that plays into it, also. People patronized and beleived what they wanted to hear. In fact, a funny story was from this year’s meeting of the gubinitorial candidates with the Tribune’s editorial board. Governor Blagojevich told them they he really had no expectation of getting their endorsement, being a Democrat. The board noted that they had, indeed, endorsed a Democrat for Governor… in the 1940’s!
In most election years, in most parts of the County of Cook, the real election is, indeed held in March. It’s one reason why the city of Chicago elections are non-partisan. I think if we extended that to suburban and county elections in County Cook, we’d see better races.
The city elections are non-partisan only in the past few years, more inorder to protect the incumbants than anything. You now have to get 50% of the vote to win out and if several candidates are in the 1st round (what used to be the primary), then the top two go to a runoff. In this way, the incumbant is almost assured of being in the top two and can go all out in trying to beat a runoff contender if they don’t get 50% initially. Previously, you could have had an upset candidate prevail in the primary if the waters got muddied with several people around. Plus a Republican then had a “second shot” at the Democratic nominee at General election… something they didn’t want to have to face occasionally, even if the Republican rarely won. Better to get that guy caught in the muddle with the rest of the challengers.
 
But having two strong competing papers would throw a monkey in the wrench. I don’t live in a big city, though. That could make all the difference.
Not to mention several secondary journals which cater to communities and constiuencies of the metropolitan area.

As for the last Presidential race, the Republicans had long written off Illinois and so Bush didn’t bother to campaign here. No amount of endorsements can overcome a race that one of the candidates refuses to participate in.
 
As for the last Presidential race, the Republicans had long written off Illinois and so Bush didn’t bother to campaign here. No amount of endorsements can overcome a race that one of the candidates refuses to participate in.
When did Illinois last vote for a Republican pres? Does anyone happen to know?
 
A challenging situation for those in Chicago as the local papers (Sun Times and Trib) split.
Newspapers should not endorse political candidates anyhow. That’s the problem with our mainstream press today. They are supposed to report the news and not take biased positions on issues like you see so many times.

Newspapers should be objective and should not take sides. They should not be endorsing political candidates period!
 
Newspapers should not endorse political candidates anyhow. That’s the problem with our mainstream press today. They are supposed to report the news and not take biased positions on issues like you see so many times.

Newspapers should be objective and should not take sides. They should not be endorsing political candidates period!
I disagree. The press has ALWAYS had a perspective. And, traditionally, they have been much more honest and open about it. In fact, that is precisely why we have freedom of the press as part of our constitution. So let them endorse away. It’s merely up to the voters to decide whether they agree with the editorial viewpoint and biases of the journal.

For my money, I’m thankful to live in a city with many voices rather than just one paper with a single viewpoint it gets to spout off as dogma unchallenged.
 
I’m disappointed in the IRL candidate information sheets this year. Despite the fact that the IFRL endorsed Stufflebeam, the IRL didn’t even list him. I emailed them and asked about this and their answer was basically “we don’t deal with write-ins” and “they don’t have a realistic chance”. Yet the Green party candidate is polling at 13%!!!

Sometimes I wonder if some of my fellow pro-lifers have their brains turned off to save electricity.
 
I’m disappointed in the IRL candidate information sheets this year. Despite the fact that the IFRL endorsed Stufflebeam, the IRL didn’t even list him. I emailed them and asked about this and their answer was basically “we don’t deal with write-ins” and “they don’t have a realistic chance”. Yet the Green party candidate is polling at 13%!!!
I actually saw a campaign sign for somebody else for Governor whose name I didn’t recognize. I think it was planted in the grass at the corner of Fullerton and Logan or something, if anyone cares to go down and inspect it. Had a website address and everything. Don’t know that it was the Greeny, either.

So if the Green Party candidate gets over 5%, that means that they’re automatically on the ballot (or at least have “established party” priveleges) for the next election, no?
 
Here’s the latest opinion I’ve read on the issue. It supports the idea that the best thing would be for Blagojevich to win.

It’s from the Trib.
Blagojevich win just what GOP needs
Code:
    Published November 5, 2006
  
Can Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich save the Illinois Republican Party from itself by winning re-election on Tuesday?
Yes.

Heresy, you say? But of course. I plead guilty. So boil me in oil or something, but please wait until next week, after I’ve had a nice steak at Gene & Georgetti on Election Day.

Only a heretic would suggest that Blagojevich–the Chicago machine pol whose administration is swimming in federal subpoenas–could save the state GOP from self-inflicted wounds…
for more click link above.
 
It’s really too bad that former Sen. Fitzgerald didn’t run for governor. I actually went into mourning when he announced that he wasn’t running for re-election. He is the one elected official that mirrored my views almost 100%!

And regarding the 2004 senate contest - word has it that the reason that Mike Ditka didn’t let himself be chosen to replace Ryan is that his wife threatened to divorce him if he did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top