What's going to replace sex in our society

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robert_Sock
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How much sex can get crammed into society? Will the sexual revolution last indefinitely, or is there optimism that it will give way to some other vice or perhaps even virtue. I personally believe that spiritual rewards are going to tame the sexual revolution, and provide much more pleasure than the lowly and primitive orgasm.
I don’t see this changing any time soon. And it’s my understanding that kids are having sex (actual intercourse) at younger and younger ages and see this as normal. They refer to it as ‘hooking up’ which separates the seriousness of it from what is actually happenng.

As anecdote: A young high shool kid told me of a girl (nothing against girls, this is just an example) who would engage in oral sex with males, whereas she would only have intercourse with her boyfriend. Her reasoning/thought pattern “I can only give you oral, we can’t have sex, because I have a boyfriend”. Things like that I don’t think happened when I was in high school in the early 80’s (and if they did they were rare). This young kid lead me to believe that this typle of thinking and behaving is pretty commonplace. ‘hooking up’ is look at casually as if it’s along the same lines of ‘going ot the mall’ or ‘hanging out’, etc… There seems to be little to no negative stigma for young teenagers to engage in sex (although it is my understanding that some might be labelled as the SL** word if they go from guy to guy to guy to guy. But if they have a boyfriend and regularly have sex, then break up and ‘hook up’ with some guy that same night this woud be seen as normal and socially acceptable.

This ‘hooking up’ thing takes things to a whole different level than when I was in high school. Also, very few kids would have sex in jr high. Now I think this is much more common. I don’t see it slowing down. Fear of HIV or AiDS or getting pregnant isn’t slowing it down.

Sorry to present such a bleak outlook but I see no reason to expect any diferent in the next couple of decades at least…

Good solid parenting will, I believe, have an impact, and a potenatilly very strong one. But this is within individual families and not representative of society in general.

Also, keep in mind that things have been headed in this direction for generations and generations, at least as far as what is seen as acceptable dress for females in society. And with testosterone fueled males in their teen years, it’s got to be like holding back a pack of wolves wanting to march off on one of those dog sleds. If said male has the tacit or overt approval of their father/uncles/older brothers…they are going to be wanting to be having free for all’s with as many girls as possible.

So it comes back to the parents, as it always does. What % of parents actively teach abstinance from a very young age to both their male and female children? And of those, how many do it well enough to overcome the teens desires mixed with the influence of other teens their age. I think it will take strong parental influence from an early age coupled with close parental supervision throughout their teenage years…and of course an open relationship where the teen actually feels comfortable and confident discussing such matters with their parents… and this needs to be built into the relationship long before puberty hits…

God Bless,
Bill
 
When is the following supposed to happen? This would certainly limit sex.
For this is the testament which I will make to the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord: I will give my laws into their mind, and in their heart will I write them: and I will be their God, and they shall be my people: And they shall not teach every man his neighbour and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me from the least to the greatest of them:
–Hebrews 8:10-11
 
I do not completely buy into the notion of “I’m not hurting anyone but myself.” .
Yes, but this is just YOUR view. It isn’t necessarilly shared by the majority of society so while you will be thoughtful of others when it comes to your behavior, others might be much less so…

God Bless,
Bill
 
We, as Catholics, are not in the business of wanting sex to be “limited.” Let’s hope one day there’s more sex. 😃
You’re talking like Marc Barnes from BadCatholic. 😃
You are indeed right. More proper sex please.
 
Yes, but this is just YOUR view. It isn’t necessarilly shared by the majority of society so while you will be thoughtful of others when it comes to your behavior, others might be much less so…

God Bless,
Bill
I think your “majority of society” is either oblivious or in denial of what harm it does to others. Just because they don’t think it harms any one doesn’t make it so.
 
To answer the thread titles question… i dont think anything will replace sex, but rather, be in addition to it.

If we look to Rome and their embrace of vice…I can assume glorification of brutal violence, gluttony, anything that fulfills the senses in excess. And people say society will be getting better, ha!
 
The ‘pleasures’ of sex in our society are extremely strong and overrated. One ought to work on increasing their spirituality instead of having an obsession to sex.
 
Pope Benedict has called us to “radical obedience.” It took 40 years to gradually get here, but don’t forget, there are Catholics that form the remnant that God keeps in place at all times. Traditional Marriage is returning. The media, which was once respectful of Christianity, will reap what it is sowing. Like some Catholics, there will be no cable or satellite or streaming of what the media has taught people to like. No more watching TV or buying certain newspapers or magazines, or even comic books.

Catholic parents are home schooling their kids because they know what is out there and will equip them to engage the culture and reform it. Put your trust in God first.

Peace,
Ed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top