C
Cathoholic
Guest
Being “born again” is being “born of water and the Spirit”. Jesus says so.
Jesus tells Nicodemus he needs to be “born again” (also translated as “born anew” or “born from above”). Nicodemus was confused (HOW do I do THAT?). Jesus then tells Nicodemus the answer. Jesus tells him he must be “born of water and the Spirit”.
JOHN 3:3-4a, 5, 22 3 Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born anew, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” 4 Nicodemus said to him, "How can a man be born when he is old? . . . . 5 Jesus answered, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. . . . 22 After this Jesus and his disciples went into the land of Judea; there he remained with them and baptized.
michaelhager.
Thanks for sharing your feelings in post 215. And I don’t think anyone here wants to discount your emotions.
And when you discuss (Anabaptist) Protestants (such as “Baptists”) who have emotional experiences with religious events in their lives they too should not be ignored.
And I would even go so far as to admit that maybe there are in some way . . . . . channels of some sort of authentic graces from God with these experiences. Perhaps even more than a proverbial shoulder tap.
But not the justifying grace that comes through obeying Jesus through Baptism.
I don’t have enough faith in my (or anyone else’s) emotions for that. But I DO put faith in Jesus Christ and what HE said.
And when Quakers, Unitarians, Salvation Army religions (or others) are even critical of say Baptists (who deny justifying grace through Baptism, but DO get Baptized anyway to “show the community”) and these Quakers or whoever, REJECT ALL Baptisms including that of the Baptists on account of what they personally FEEL, they should not be neglected either.
And when pagans or other non-Christians have emotional religious pagan experiences I don’t think those ought to be disregarded either (see post 212). (The issue is, HOW should we regard these “experiences”)
Nor am I saying we should have apathy toward atheists who have emotional convictions that are associated with their quasi-religious ceremonies (the real issue again is, HOW should we regard these “experiences”).
Maybe God is using emotions to call these people to something higher.
But if you let yourself remain uncatechized about what really being “born again” is, then . . . .
Continued . . . .
Jesus tells Nicodemus he needs to be “born again” (also translated as “born anew” or “born from above”). Nicodemus was confused (HOW do I do THAT?). Jesus then tells Nicodemus the answer. Jesus tells him he must be “born of water and the Spirit”.
JOHN 3:3-4a, 5, 22 3 Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born anew, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” 4 Nicodemus said to him, "How can a man be born when he is old? . . . . 5 Jesus answered, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. . . . 22 After this Jesus and his disciples went into the land of Judea; there he remained with them and baptized.
michaelhager.
Thanks for sharing your feelings in post 215. And I don’t think anyone here wants to discount your emotions.
And when you discuss (Anabaptist) Protestants (such as “Baptists”) who have emotional experiences with religious events in their lives they too should not be ignored.
And I would even go so far as to admit that maybe there are in some way . . . . . channels of some sort of authentic graces from God with these experiences. Perhaps even more than a proverbial shoulder tap.
But not the justifying grace that comes through obeying Jesus through Baptism.
I don’t have enough faith in my (or anyone else’s) emotions for that. But I DO put faith in Jesus Christ and what HE said.
And when Quakers, Unitarians, Salvation Army religions (or others) are even critical of say Baptists (who deny justifying grace through Baptism, but DO get Baptized anyway to “show the community”) and these Quakers or whoever, REJECT ALL Baptisms including that of the Baptists on account of what they personally FEEL, they should not be neglected either.
And when pagans or other non-Christians have emotional religious pagan experiences I don’t think those ought to be disregarded either (see post 212). (The issue is, HOW should we regard these “experiences”)
Nor am I saying we should have apathy toward atheists who have emotional convictions that are associated with their quasi-religious ceremonies (the real issue again is, HOW should we regard these “experiences”).
Maybe God is using emotions to call these people to something higher.
But if you let yourself remain uncatechized about what really being “born again” is, then . . . .
- You IGNORE what Jesus taught about being “born again”.
- You propagate the error of your own personal definition (over and above what Jesus taught us) of what being “born again” really is. Some people call this “faith”. I call it “lack of faith”.
- You also may HINDER someone who really WANTS to do the will of Jesus and be “born again” the way JESUS WANTS them to be “born again”. But now they won’t bother to be Baptized at all (because after all, why should I get Baptized? michaelhager told me my emotional experience WAS being “born again”).
Continued . . . .
)